let’s gooo

  • cum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6711 months ago

    Once the hateful boomers die out, the republican party will be finished. They know this and is why they have been focusing on voter suppression so much.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2511 months ago

      I remember seeing this comment on Digg while people speculated that W would be the last republican president elected for a generation.

      • @AFaithfulNihilist
        link
        2411 months ago

        To be fair, he didn’t win his first election by getting the most votes, and neither did Trump.

        The Republicans realized during the Reagan administration that they would soon be unable to win the presidency with a majority of votes and took many steps to undermine the Democratic process. Voter suppression, purges, intimidation, voter ID laws, all of that began with Reagan.

        Bush the elder was the last to win a “democratic” victory. If it weren’t for 9/11, Bush wouldn’t have been able to win his second election either. That fact always blows my mind. Like people rallied around the incompetent fool who managed to ignore warnings and let a terrorist strike happen only to then go on and invade the wrong country multiple times and spend trillions of dollars on nothing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1511 months ago

          I don’t disagree. I’m just calling out the whole “things will change when conservatives start dying off” trope because people have been banking on that for 20 years.

        • @pigup
          link
          611 months ago

          " ya don’t change horses midstream 🤠" was a literal campaign ad phrase back then I remember

          Boomers have a lot of lead accumulated in their brains, not entirely their fault

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            711 months ago

            That was so dumb. We literally had a President die in office during the biggest war humanity has ever seen, and we still won. Not only that, but Truman was kept out of the loop on a lot of things (“What’s the Manhattan Project all about?”).

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1811 months ago

        If the US president got elected by getting the most votes, there wouldn’t have been a Republican since Bush senior. I really don’t understand why electoral reform is not higher on the political agenda in the US.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          Having it based purely on a popular vote will still wind up with a 2 party system. Ranked voting needs to be implemented. All of the benefits of a popular vote, with actual checks and balances to elevate 3rd parties.

        • Lad
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          The Democratic party and Republican party are united in their opposition to electoral reform because they both benefit the most from it.

        • @stoly
          link
          311 months ago

          This was the deal with the devil that people in the North made with people in the South to convince people in the South to join them in a government specifically set up to defy the British. The US as a democracy has always failed because it was designed to give ultimate executive power to the states rather than to the people.

        • @I_Fart_Glitter
          link
          011 months ago

          Because the DNC enjoys power more than democracy and does not allow such things to happen.

          • @Clent
            link
            911 months ago

            That’s right wing spin.

            Only the politically ignorant believe it.

            • @I_Fart_Glitter
              link
              -211 months ago

              Lol. No. Only the politically ignorant think that the DNC is anything but a power hungry juggernaut, set on choosing candidates based on their own agenda regardless of the will of the people. They don’t even really seem to care if their candidate gets elected.

              I really don’t understand how more of a fuss wasn’t made when they cheated Bernie out of a fair shot, were sued by donors and used the defense “We were so blatantly favoring our favorite that anyone who thought we were being impartial wasn’t paying attention and deserved to be swindled out of their money! Yes, we broke rules to get Sanders out of the running, but we were very obvious about it and they were our own rules and we can break them if we want, so get fucked.” And the court was like… “Yeah… sounds good.”

              https://observer.com/2017/08/court-admits-dnc-and-debbie-wasserman-schulz-rigged-primaries-against-sanders/

              • @Clent
                link
                311 months ago

                You’re still hurting over Bernie. That’s cute.

                Politically that was a long time ago and you’re still holding a grudge over it. This is why the Democrats lose.

                Many on the left needs to be placated with something new every election cycle while the right votes without any hesitation.

          • @stoly
            link
            7
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The DNC would actually benefit here because the popular vote would always bring in a Democrat. It’s the small, red states that will never let change happen because Wyoming enjoys having more direct representation than California.

            • SeaJ
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              The PEOPLE would benefit since they are the ones doing the voting, not the states. It is just as ridiculous that Republicans in California have little say in the presidency as Democrats in Wyoming.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                411 months ago

                It is just as ridiculous that Republicans in California have little say in the presidency as Democrats in Wyoming.

                The Republicans in California have a better chance of seeing a Republican president with the electoral college than they would with a national popular vote, even if their particular votes carry less weight. In a sense that gives them more representation in the end, not less—their voices are ignored but they get what they wanted anyway.

              • @stoly
                link
                311 months ago

                These things are not mutually exclusive.

            • @Clent
              link
              111 months ago

              deleted by creator

          • SeaJ
            link
            fedilink
            7
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            Or because it would take a constitutional amendment. The only way around that would be making the electoral college irrelevant via the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact which has largely only been signed by democratic leaning states. In fact, of the states that have passed it, zero have been right leaning.

            There are certainly shitty corporate democrats that do fall into your category but to say the party as a whole is that way is ignorant.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            411 months ago

            That must be why Republican-dominated states have passed the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact. /s

      • @banneryear1868
        link
        711 months ago

        Yeah this has been a thing forever. DeSantis was the strong culture war candidate too and… yeah. Trump has a clear role in culture war but he doesn’t seem to care personally, he flip flops all the time on many culture war issues depending on what is convenient or funny to say in the moment.

        • @Clent
          link
          411 months ago

          It’s almost like he’s playing both sides of many issues; as a conman does and as the mark allows.

      • @stoly
        link
        411 months ago

        It’s important to remember that collapse doesn’t happen overnight, and then suddenly it does. It takes a great deal of times for cracks to form and a structure to fall, but once it goes, it goes.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2411 months ago

      They’re more powerful and influential than you think - they’re not going anywhere. They might change their policies to suit the times (remember Lincoln was a Republican) but the so-called “Grand Old Party” ain’t going nowhere unfortunately.

      • @Xtallll
        link
        2411 months ago

        If they pull a reverse Southern strategy and jump over and their become more left then the Democrats, I would be willing to vote for them. Also, hell freezing over might help with global warming.

        • @RGB3x3
          link
          English
          16
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It’s not the name that’s the issue. Whether they’re called “Democrat” or “Republican” doesn’t matter.

          It’s their backwards-ass, regressive, hateful policies that I don’t vote for.

          If they start saying they’re going to force companies to take accountability for their impact on the climate, pledge to give the country a UBI, and socialized healthcare, I’d vote for a “Republican” so fast that I’d need new tires.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            411 months ago

            If they start saying they’re going to force companies to take accountability for their impact on the climate, pledge to give the country a UBI, and socialized healthcare, I’d vote for a “Republican” so fast that I’d need new tires.

            I’m willing to go along with that, but with the recognition that between now and when we both die of old age we’ve got a greater chance of seeing absolute proof of intelligent extraterrestrial life than we do of seeing this happen believably enough for either of us to actually pull that lever.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2211 months ago

      They nearly overrode the vote last time around. They faced no consequences and they’re very close to being in a position to do it again and make lasting changes to seize power forever. Nothing good is guaranteed.

      And they’re rewriting education including made up history to ensure that more kids are conservative in future generations. Things aren’t looking good.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        611 months ago

        They faced no consequences

        Except the 200+ people who were convicted and are currently sitting in jail.

        And, as cynical as we might be, we have to remember that Trump’s various trials are not over yet.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          411 months ago

          Ues. The pawns were convicted and the people with actual power faced no consequences. The ringleader could very well be elected president where he ignored the law consistently. His trials keep getting delayed and the corrupt judge he appointed keeps helping him. It’s very scary times.

      • @vimdiesel
        link
        English
        411 months ago

        They literally have plans on concentration camps for reeducation into christofascism.

    • @stoly
      link
      2011 months ago

      There are still plenty of ignorant and angry Gen X and Millenials. I agree that the GOP is finished, and it’s only a matter of time. There will always be stupid people to pick up their mantle, however.

      • @vimdiesel
        link
        English
        211 months ago

        Plenty ignorant Gen Z while we’re on the top, ain’t nothing special about y’all. Vote democrat or you’re just helping Trump turn America fascists and then the reeducation camps will start

        • @stoly
          link
          311 months ago

          I’m Gen X, but thanks. I work with university students and trust me that everyone else is a dinosaur.

    • @daemoz
      link
      2011 months ago

      Tdont kid yourself, look at the numbers, Trump is propped up by gen x. The demographic loudest against biden are gunna be around a long time.

      • @stoly
        link
        1111 months ago

        demographic loudest against biden

        And add in the “Biden = genocide but I have no alternative to offer so I guess I want Trump to win” crowd and you can be in trouble.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1211 months ago

          As terrible as Biden’s stance on the Israel/Palestine conflict is, he’s still the lesser of two evils. Another Trump presidency would not spell good things for Palestinian civilians.

          • @stoly
            link
            13
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            And that’s my point. Trump CERTAINLY will be worse, but people have decided that they will let the greater of two evils in by default rather than work to bring in the lesser of the two.

            People who think that Biden is genocidal have seen nothing yet compared to Trump being in that role agian.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              611 months ago

              It’s like they forgot all of the pro-Israel moments of Donald Trump’s 4 years in office. But since October 7th 2023, people have actually started to receive an education in Israeli/Palestinian relations. Most people thought it started on October 7th 2023 and not, you know, 75 years before that.

              • @stoly
                link
                511 months ago

                It is the first real conflict in a generation or so, there are probably many people who never thought of it before and are suddenly interested.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          411 months ago

          The fact that crowd exists is a scary reminder of the power of propaganda, advertising, and manipulation. It’s a clear and devastating example of using people’s values against them. It’s an entirely artificially created demographic. To people who didn’t get caught on that particular baited hook, it looks insane.

          • @Delta_V
            link
            3
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            The fundamentals of how to wage information/cognitive warfare should be part of public schools’ curriculum so our kids will recognize when its happening.

          • @stoly
            link
            211 months ago

            And yet those who did are passionately angry at you for not agreeing with them. Like insulting your dead grandma and saying you should never have been born kind of angry. It’s so weird.

    • @CaptainProton
      link
      English
      1211 months ago

      But what will replace them? Uni-party doesn’t work either (e.g. NYC)

      • @proudblond
        link
        English
        4011 months ago

        Hopefully the Democrats. No seriously, I hope the Dems become our more conservative party and we get a more progressive party. But… I’m not holding my breath, honestly. Feels like wishful thinking.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        A new party will pop up. The Federalist Party died out after Hamilton was shot and also the War of 1812. They fielded their last Presidential candidate in 1816 with 30.9% of the vote.

        Then the National Republican Party (different from the current Republican party) evolved out of the Democratic-Republican Party.

        Personally, I’d love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          311 months ago

          Personally, I’d love it if Democrats became the right-most party by staying exactly as they are, and a new party breaks off of them or evolves out to their left.

          I’d say it’s more likely to go the other way, with the more moderate or right-leaning Democrats breaking off to form their own party and perhaps steal away the more moderate Republican voters. There are a lot of voters who would naturally align more closely with traditional Republican political views voting Democrat only because the Republican party has been taken over by a radical faction. Having laissez-faire fiscal conservatives and outright socialists in the same party isn’t really sustainable long-term; there are too many critical points of disagreement.

        • @CaptainProton
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          Democrats aren’t exactly a healthy representation of moderation. They’re too authoritarian for me to want the other party to be the actually-socialist party. Socialist and libertarian would be a balance, but it requires a big chunk of the Democrat platform to burn alongside MAGA. Honestly actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today.

          • @Delta_V
            link
            -111 months ago

            actually-socialist and actually-libertarian would be the two parties we really need today

            they’re the same party

            • @CaptainProton
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              11 months ago

              Which one is that? I’m not sure you understand the difference if you think both can possibly be represented by the same party.

    • billwashere
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      I hope so but I think my fellow gen x’ers will just become as hateful and bigoted.

    • @SpezBroughtMeHere
      link
      -1111 months ago

      The boomer remover was in full swing and then some asshat said we needed a vaccine and you all ate it up.