Alina Habba “can’t even do things that you learn in evidence class,” says CNN legal analyst Elie Honig

A former White House attorney for Donald Trump said Wednesday he’s “not surprised” the former president is looking for new representation for his appeal of the defamation trial verdict, calling out Trump lawyer Alina Habba’s management of the case. Trump announced late Tuesday that he was seeking new counsel for his appeal of the $83.3 million verdict in the defamation lawsuit brought by writer E. Jean Carroll. Habba, who served as Trump’s lead attorney and frequently clashed with the presiding judge throughout the trial, handled the case “in the mafia way,” Ty Cobb told CNN Wednesday, according to HuffPost.

“She’s done his bidding. She’s articulated his political narrative of victimization and unfairness in the judicial system and made some outlandish claims, including the conflict claims,” Cobb continued. "And she lost, so she’s a loser. I’m not surprised that Trump is looking for appellate representation.”

  • @reddig33
    link
    123
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I doubt he will replace her with anyone more competent. He can’t afford anyone good, has a poor track record of picking lawyers, and he’s burned too many bridges without the cash to pay for it.

    • @oDDmON
      link
      5510 months ago

      He’s also stiffed multitudes of his previous service providers and contractors, IIRC.

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      4010 months ago

      Also his idea of “good” is someone who doesn’t contradict him. He wants to run the case his way, and no reasonably intelligent lawyer will ever agree to that as it will make them look like idiots and the case is a sure loss.

      • @PilferJynx
        link
        1710 months ago

        You’d have to be paid enough up front to destroy your career. I don’t think he has the money for that.

      • @EvilBit
        link
        1610 months ago

        And a huge rack is a bonus.

        • @Pretzilla
          link
          7
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Pretty key feature for her predictable career pivot to right wingnut TV legal commentator in 3, 2, 1…

      • @shyguyblue
        link
        English
        910 months ago

        The attorney for the plaintiff even said her entire demeanor changed when trump was out of the room. He wants loyalty, competence optional.

      • Billiam
        link
        810 months ago

        Guess we can assume Alina Habba isn’t “reasonably intelligent” then cause… man, does she look like an idiot.

          • @A7thStone
            link
            1010 months ago

            This really talks to the world view of these people. They are so stupid they think everything is a show put in for other people. They believe everyone is just like them. That’s why they project more than AMC. Their obsession with “virtue signaling” is a perfect example.

            • sab
              link
              fedilink
              1110 months ago

              At least this lady is self aware. She knows her strength isn’t her legal skills, and she knows she won’t be young forever. So for her taking on a big case and being exposed as incompetent for the whole world might be worth it - it’s unlikely she had much of a legal career to destroy anyway.

              She has also inflicted more damage on Trump than any of his opponents have. I respect that.

      • @modeler
        link
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Well that’s obviously true! Trump’s one of the greatest legal minds ever, so any ordinary lawyer should simply recognise this and follow Trump’s lead. Anything else means you’re a dumb lawyer /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1710 months ago

      That’s a good point. I should offer my services and then let him take the stand to his own detriment. I’ll even say I’ll do it for free upfront.

      • lgstarn
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        That’s kind of a cool idea, but depending on where you are this is illegal and/or unethical as lawyers have a fiduciary duty to represent their client’s best interest.

        https://www.stimmel-law.com/en/articles/fiduciary-duty

        A lawyer owes a fiduciary duty to a client. The lawyer must at all times act in the best interest of the client and must make full disclosure of any economic or other interest that the lawyer has that might conflict with the interest of the client. The lawyer is obligated to take all actions and give all advice that will benefit the client and to use professional skill and energy to protect the client’s interests. Should a conflict of interest arise (for example, the lawyer discovers that one client wishes to hire him to sue another one of his clients) the lawyer must immediately make full disclosure of such conflict and take steps to immediately end the conflict regardless of the personal cost to the lawyer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          410 months ago

          The client gets to decide the client’s best interest. If he wants to take the stand, blocking him from doing so would be a violation of fiduciary duty.

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      410 months ago

      I’m waiting for the court appointed attorneys to show up. at least for the criminal trials.