• @aeronmelon
    link
    4511 months ago

    I’m not laughing.

    I’m taking this in complete seriousness.

    Charles Dickens wrote The Christmas Carol with Muppets in mind.

    You cannot persuade me to believe otherwise.

      • @WhiskyTangoFoxtrot
        link
        611 months ago

        Charles Dickens had someone’s hand up his butt the whole time.

        Didn’t have anything to do with the Muppets, though.

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 months ago

      If he didn’t have the Ghost of Christmas Present Muppet in mind when he wrote the character, he was a damned fool.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4011 months ago

    I mean, he might have liked it, it’s not a bad movie and it’s not a terrible adaptation of the story either. Probably would have to first explain the context of what the muppets are and a bit about the various characters to really get some of it though

    • @fpslem
      link
      3011 months ago

      Puppets have been used in comedy and cultural commentary since Punch & Judy and before. Dickens would have dug it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2411 months ago

        I meant more the context of the individual characters. Like, having Statler and Waldorf as Marley is funnier if you know who those two are

        • TheMongoose
          link
          fedilink
          211 months ago

          Also he’d need to know who Bob Marley was in order get the Jacob and Robert gag…

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        411 months ago

        Punch and Judy appear in the background of at least one of the opening scenes of The Muppet Christmas Carol

    • palordrolap
      link
      fedilink
      1611 months ago

      J. Draper, London historian and, from what I gather, popular TikToker and YouTuber, has an interesting hour-long video comparing the Muppet version to the original as well as the various things that wouldn’t necessarily be covered in the original, like costumes and how London looked. It’s not quite a watch-along, but it does cover things in movie order.

      Watch here

      If you’re of short attention span (not judging, I’m in the same boat), put in on in the background while doing something else.

      • @proudblond
        link
        English
        911 months ago

        I just watched this last night! Her takeaway is that is pretty good overall. Most of the costuming is pretty spot-on, even the muppets’, and she makes concessions for some of the things that aren’t true to the book since it’s ostensibly a kids movie and there is stuff that just wouldn’t make sense. A lot of the script is pulled directly from the book. Her big critique is about Scrooge’s childhood but she even finds a possible reason they decided to change that too. It’s really quite interesting! Also, as an American, I find it absolutely hilarious that she can’t comprehend that Americans don’t know what a Christmas pudding is. To us, pudding means something completely different!

        • palordrolap
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          She doesn’t point out why the extra Marley might have been given the name Robert [1] (or maybe I missed a subtle raised eyebrow somewhere), nor did she show the shop front entitled Micklewhite’s [2], but I don’t suppose those fun facts are particularly relevant to a comparison / review.

          [1] Bob Marley. Geddit? Funny joke is funny.

          [2] Michael Caine’s birth name was Maurice Micklewhite. He only made the legal change to his stage name fairly recently, well after the Muppet Christmas Carol even, because he found that people were confused and made suspicious by his documents not having “his name” on them when he was travelling.

          • @proudblond
            link
            English
            111 months ago

            Ooooh I didn’t catch the Marley joke, brilliant. And I didn’t know that about Michael Caine! Great insights!

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        “You’ve been to the theater, now you can have the theater in your living room.”

        Done.

        Shakespeare predates Dickens by a couple centuries, and the ancient Greeks predate him by a couple millenia.

    • @AngryCommieKender
      link
      311 months ago

      It’s the only adaptation that has Dickens himself portrayed. Admittedly I don’t think Gonzo is an accurate depiction, other than the clothes, but it did allow them to put far more of the actual text of the book into the movie than any other adaptation, because they had a narrator.

  • 😈MedicPig🐷BabySaver😈
    link
    1511 months ago

    I love that movie. We went to see it in the Theater on 12/23. Lots of fun to watch with an audience filled with many kids. Plenty of laughter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1011 months ago

    But does he prefer the “original” or “extended” versions?

    (Yes, I know the extended was released before they cut The Sad Song out and pretended it never happened)

    • @MajorHavoc
      link
      411 months ago

      “When… This song… Is gone…!”

    • @DontTreadOnBigfoot
      link
      211 months ago

      It’s back now though! They finally found the missing original reels and restored it in hd widescreen format.

  • @OmenAtom
    link
    911 months ago

    Nothing oddly about it