• @Burninator05
    link
    110
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    The mode human body contains enough bones to make an entire skeleton. The average human body doesn’t have enough.

    • Greg Clarke
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3610 months ago

      The additional ~200 bones from fetuses in late stage pregnant woman would be more than the missing bones from amputees etc. OPs statement is accurate.

      • @jaybone
        link
        910 months ago

        Wouldn’t they be too small though?

      • @QuaternionsRock
        link
        410 months ago

        You can’t use one unfused half-bone in place of one full bone >:(

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          210 months ago

          What if we use the little fetus bones to replace some of the smaller adult bones, and take those smaller adult bones to replace some bigger adult bones, and so on until we have a big ol’ femur?

        • Greg Clarke
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          The statement “the ocean contains enough water to fill a bucket” doesn’t mean the ocean only contains a single bucket of water. “The ocean contains enough water to fill one bucket” might imply that the ocean only contains one bucket of water but OP doesn’t specify a number. This is an interesting conversation on ambiguous semantics in English.

    • @JusticeForPorygon
      link
      15
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      The word average can technically refer to arithmetic mean, median, mode, or range. That’s why you were probably taught them at the same time. That’s also why tests like the ACT tend to have a * at the top that says something along the lines of “Unless otherwise stated, the word average indicates arithmetic mean.”

        • @JusticeForPorygon
          link
          710 months ago

          Because mean is the most common form of average. But, for example, when referring to salaries, the words median and average are often used interchangeably.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            This isn’t true at all

            Edit: well they may be used interchangebly, but they’re also used incorrectly in that case

    • MacN'Cheezus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1310 months ago

      Actually, the average human body contains more than one skeleton.

      • @evidences
        link
        510 months ago

        This depends entirely on how many people there are out there with missing limbs.

        • MacN'Cheezus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          510 months ago

          It would have to be a lot considering that a baby has a full set of bones while a missing limb is generally only a few of them.

          • @evidences
            link
            210 months ago

            Half the bones in a adult human are in the hands and feet. I don’t know if there’s enough missing limbs to offset fetus skeletons but I there’s a whole lot of bones missing in a double amputee.

            • MacN'Cheezus
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              Babies have up to 270 bones at birth (instead of 206 in an adult), which makes up for at least one double amputee (hands have 27 bones and feet have 26 each).

    • dream_weasel
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      Are infinitesimally shaved average bones not bones? Idk who is the bone authority responsible for making that decision.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            610 months ago

            Pregnant women as well. Now their human body contains two skeletons, thus raising the average number of bones in a human body by a considerable amount. I would guess there’s probably more pregnant women than there are people missing limbs.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              310 months ago

              Ok then technically we are all born with an extra set of teeth. That we lose. So a full skeleton contains all the baby teeth as well.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                110 months ago

                Traditionaly when talking about the skeleton, we refer to the adult skeleton seeing as an adolescent skeleton have more bones that then fuse. I agree that we need to take that into account, but I don’t believe the statement would be referring to an adolescent skeleton.

        • dream_weasel
          link
          fedilink
          110 months ago

          Plenty of people do. My sister for example had bones in her feet that never fused and had to have an extra removed. I guess that’s pretty common

        • TheRealKuni
          link
          English
          110 months ago

          My wife has an extra rib above her collarbone.

        • Exatron
          link
          110 months ago

          Some people were born with extra fingers, and sometimes entire extra limbs.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      Different perspective: Even if you miss a limb your body contains the full 100% of the skeleton you can find in a person missing that limb.

      There still complete human beings even if their body has a unique challenge.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        510 months ago

        I appreciate what you’re saying here - people come in all shapes and sizes, with different abilities, limb counts, etc. Every one is a human being deserving respect and dignity.

        But OP didn’t say “a complete human being” - it said “a complete human skeleton.”

        If an individual is missing a limb, by birth or by accident, they don’t have a complete skeleton. It’s a plain fact. Doesn’t mean they are any less human.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I guess you could say they’re missing body parts, but not humanity parts (necessarily)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            Yeah kind of - I think “a complete body” is neither necessary or sufficient to make one a “human being.”

            For example, there are plenty of murderers, rapists, and pedos with “complete bodies,” that have entirely lost their humanity in commission of their crimes against humanity. (However, I will always argue that this can never be a justification to exact cruelty upon them, as we necessarily lose our humanity in that process).

            And there are so many people with “incomplete” bodies who are amazingly beautiful and strong human beings.

  • @Gigan
    link
    1610 months ago

    No it doesn’t, because some people are missing limbs or ribs or have artificial joints. So the average body would have slightly fewer bones than necessary to make a whole skeleton.

    • Kbin_space_program
      link
      fedilink
      2810 months ago

      Pregnant women would increase the average to greater than one complete skeleton per person.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        710 months ago

        But are those bones in the body of the pregnant woman, or is the body of the fetus a different set?

        • Greg Clarke
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          Even if you count the fetus as a human, the fetuses bones are still inside the pregnant woman. So there are still more than one skeleton on average inside humans.

      • Carl
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        Oh, don’t forget conjoined twins.

  • @MTK
    link
    1310 months ago

    Probably false, the avarage probably has a bit less then needed fo a full skeleton.

      • @Agent641
        link
        3
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Its gonna be some stupid number, like 1.0777655678 skeletons per adult, on average. Even considering twins and triplets and quad amputees

  • dream_weasel
    link
    fedilink
    1110 months ago

    Despite all the “AKcHUaLLy” comments this is probably true.

    If the body has 206 bones and the global average is like 205.7, a bone that is even partially complete is still a bone, and it is probably so close to 206 that the missing parts are negligible and distributed across the skeleton anyway. Think about it, how many people do you know that are missing an appendage or a bone by defect? I bet it’s less than 0.5% of everyone you know.

    Take my upvote.

    • Carl
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      I have 2 neighbours is missing a leg, and a family friend missing a finger. I am one of the outliers.

      • Greg Clarke
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        Did these people lose their limbs before or after they met you?

      • dream_weasel
        link
        fedilink
        210 months ago

        That is a lot of missing bones. How many people would you estimate that you know though? I went to a small high school and I bet out of 500 total I knew 300 just from school. There are lots of family and coworkers and stuff that drive that number pretty high even if you know some amputees.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 months ago

      But it still wouldn’t be an entire human skeleton, as there’s more to a skeleton than just the number of bones.

      • dream_weasel
        link
        fedilink
        310 months ago

        So by this logic, if you age and develop arthritis you no longer possess a complete human skeleton?

    • @Sidhean
      link
      010 months ago

      You’ve finally done it. You out-akchuallied the pedantic nerds, becoming, yourself, the final gatekeeper of pedantry

  • Chef_Boyargee
    link
    910 months ago

    I feel like there should be a joke in here about giving someone’s mom an extra bone last night

  • @NotMelon
    link
    7
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    HOW???!!! How is that possible? I blame illuminati for this.

  • @Snapz
    link
    710 months ago

    Big (body) if true

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        You sure? I think it might be lower considering lost limbs and so. Pregnancies would raise it but pregnancy is temporary while lost limbs tend to be permanent.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    510 months ago

    technically, because noone has a higher amount of bones but many people have less, this is false.

  • @Seudo
    link
    510 months ago

    Some people say there’s a spooky skeleton inside you right now!