• @TheGrandNagus
    link
    English
    155
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    It’s good that these tools exist, but it’s so frustrating that it’s a constant cat and mouse game of Microsoft trying to make their products as cumbersome and shit as possible and the community trying to salvage Windows to the best of their ability.

    At what point do OEMs just say actually nah, I’m tired of you making our laptops frustrating to use?

    At what point do they say fuck it I’m going the Valve route and moving away from a company that wants to undermine my products and my brand?

    • iAmTheTot
      link
      fedilink
      444 months ago

      The people who use tools like this are in the minority. The majority (probably the vast majority) of people use Windows as it is out of the box.

      • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
        link
        English
        384 months ago

        The number for people I have seen with search box still enabled in taskbar tells me that’s true.

        • @PlutoniumAcid
          link
          English
          134 months ago

          Everyone. Everywhere.

          It blows my mind, but then I realise that we here on Lemmy are the 1% of IT users.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Yeah right‽ Why do people keep the full search box enabled? It takes up so much space. I usually switch to the search button.

          I even see quite a lot of people in IT (not talking about tech or devs) that keep it enabled.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            34 months ago

            I think it’s one of those things that just becomes mentally invisible after a while. Like Microsoft slowly just drops in a new bar here, a stock ticker there, and there’s a point where a majority of folks are like “…Was that always there?” and don’t bother hunting for a way to turn it off like we do lol.

      • @TheGrandNagus
        link
        English
        23
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Yes, I know.

        But it’s not like these people actually love ads all over the place, or bing results in start menus, or popups asking them to pwetty pwease use OneDrive, or can you pwetty pwetty pwease use Edge instead of Chrome, they just either:

        • don’t know they can get rid of that stuff

        • don’t trust tools and are afraid they’ll break something or the tools will contain a virus

        • don’t care enough to research this crap

        • view using their PC as a chore anyway, and so power through the annoyances

        I don’t own a Mac, and don’t intend to, but of the biggest things people like about them is that there are far fewer of these types of annoyances.

        It’s not just extreme power users that can be irked by all this crap - they’re just the ones who do things about it and chat on forums about it. A normal person just sighs and thinks ugh I’d rather just do this on my phone

        • @asbestos
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          View using their PC as a chore anyway, and so power through the annoyances

          Damn, good one.

    • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
      link
      English
      94 months ago

      it’s a constant cat and mouse game

      It’s not just Microsoft. Never heard of always on DRM? Or government making it difficult for people to receive assistance (disability or homeless)?

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      English
      64 months ago

      At what point do OEMs just say actually nah, I’m tired of you making our laptops frustrating to use?

      You’re under the impression that most people care about the horrible parts of windows?

      • @TheGrandNagus
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I think they do.

        Enough to do much about it, other than maybe buy a MacBook if they have money to burn? Nah.

        But enough to use their PC less and try to do as much as possible on their phone/iPad? Honestly, yeah, I think so.

        I hear normies complaining about stuff in Windows all the time. It’s just when you go “well you could…” they turn off and don’t want to do anything about it, because to them you may as well be giving them advice on how they can hack their washing machine to wash clothes faster. It’s just an appliance.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Is your point that you think laptop and desktop makers could increase sales by ditching windows? That feels like suicide to me and I am a Linux lover. At what point do they do that is what you asked. When they’re desperate enough to take a risk, if ever, would be my guess

    • Andy Reid
      link
      English
      44 months ago

      At what point do OEMs just say actually nah, I’m tired of you making our laptops frustrating to use?

      LTT put out an (surprisingly insightful) video about ChromeOS and how it’s kind of secretly spreading Linux. I don’t think its crazy to say that in 5-10 years ChromeOS or similar will be the default and Windows will be a premium add on or something.

        • Andy Reid
          link
          English
          14 months ago

          lol honestly maybe competition will force them to reverse the ehittification of their product

      • phillaholic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        44 months ago

        I doubt it. Google will squander it away one way or another. It could work on a technical level, I’ve been using flex since before Google bought it for family members, it’s just poorly advertised and explained.

    • littleblue✨
      link
      English
      -174 months ago

      To be fair, Window$ has been bloat since the very day M$ stole it from its Unix roots, and Linux is everything that the OS could’ve been were it not run by money-grubbin’ cringelords.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        English
        124 months ago

        Unix roots? Lol wtf

        • Saik0
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Why wtf?

          Microsoft started as a UNIX-based programming company. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xenix

          Hell you see remnants of it in the reserved filename list.

          https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/fileio/naming-a-file?redirectedfrom=MSDN

          Devices in windows are not typically “files” like they are in unix/linux… So why CON, PRN, AUX, NUL, COM0, COM1, COM2, COM3, COM4, COM5, COM6, COM7, COM8, COM9, COM¹, COM², COM³, LPT0, LPT1, LPT2, LPT3, LPT4, LPT5, LPT6, LPT7, LPT8, LPT9, LPT¹, LPT², and LPT³ are all reserved? Because they maintained compatibility with features businesses used at the time… and never deprecated the function.

          Edit:

          image of downvotes on this post as of Feb 14 2024
          Why are we downvoting literal computer history? It is a known fact that Windows started on Unix systems. It’s a known fact that they released their own BSD-based software up to and including a full fledged Unix-based OS, and it’s a known fact that MS-DOS 1 and 2 were both Unix compatible. This is LITERALLY the definition of “roots”. Are we so touchy here that we can’t acknowledge actual computing history?

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            English
            34 months ago

            Hmm, I always thought MS was founded to steal/modify MS DOS. Interesting that they briefly did Unix stuff, but I still take issue with the way op phrased it. “Their Unix roots” makes it sound like they were heavily invested in Unix and carried that forward even into windows. I don’t know if they used any of that code in windows, but if they did you’d never know it by using dos or any windows version I’ve seen. Even despite both having command line interfaces, almost everything is different from Unix except the command “cd”, to my recollection.

          • @WhyYesZoidberg
            link
            English
            14 months ago

            “Started as”

            Yeah, no. Yes Xenix was a thing but it would be incorrect to say that it ever was their main product.

            I don’t think anyone has ever hinted on that NT has a unix code base except for some “borrowed” networking code from bsd.

            • Saik0
              link
              fedilink
              English
              2
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              it would be incorrect to say that it ever was their main product.

              They made several full versions of it… It was not simply a one off product.

              While Xenix 2.0 was still based on Version 7 Unix,[30] version 3.0 was upgraded to a Unix System III code base,[12]: 9 [31][32] a 1984 Intel manual for Xenix 286 noted that the Xenix kernel had about 10,000 lines at this time.[10]: 1–7  It was followed by a System V R2 codebase in Xenix 5.0 (a.k.a. Xenix System V).[33]

              Also,

              Microsoft’s Chris Larson described MS-DOS 2.0’s Xenix compatibility as “the second most important feature”.[38] His company advertised DOS and Xenix together, describing MS-DOS 2.0 (its “single-user OS”) as sharing features and system calls with Xenix (“the multi-user, multi-tasking, Unix-derived operating system”), and promising easy porting between them.[39]

              So they were simultaneously created AND interoperable (from a program development perspective). This was a full fledged item.

              Edit: to elaborate a little better. If they were simultaneously developed… and interoperable. And one item is Unix-based outright. Then it’s safe to say that the other item (MS-DOS) in this case is also pretty steeped in Unix roots.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            English
            -1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Sounds like an ageist to me. As far as I knew, Microsoft’s first product was msdos but I guess I’m just too unintelligent and “young” (lol) to know better

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    100
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    For me it is so weird, that you have to use extra tools to disable telemetry and unwanted features in windows systems. Why is windows not giving me a central option to decide on those things? Is it maybe because they do not want me to decide for myself and therefore splitting the places where I need to disable all that unwanted stuff as opaque as possible? Can they be more obvious that they do not value your opinion on how you want your OS to behave?

    Quit Windows. It is a dead end and get worst with every release.

    If you tolerate this, then your children will be next.

    • @IchNichtenLichten
      link
      English
      394 months ago

      want your OS

      That’s the problem, it’s not your OS.

    • Cyborganism
      link
      fedilink
      English
      344 months ago

      It’s a shame. I really love Windows 10. It’s fast and the UI’s ergonomy is near perfect.

      On my work laptop we recently had to switch to Windows 11 and it’s a fucking pain to use. You have to jump through so many hoops and do extra clicks to do what you want. And the start menu has become completely useless. And I hate the gaps and rounded corners everywhere. And that’s just on the surface. Performance is piss poor and you have all that crap spying on you to collect your usage data.

      The day Windows 10 becomes unsupported is the day I go 100% Linux.

      • deweydecibel
        link
        English
        18
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Forced to use it at work, too, and only by the grace of being in the IT department do I have the ability to make it less shitty.

        There’s registry entries to restore the full context menu, and PowerToys Run has effectively become my defacto start menu, though obviously you need to use the keyboard so it’s not a perfect UI replacement. Meanwhile for searching, I’ve got Everything running and set global keyboard shortcuts/touchpad gestures to it. Maybe I’ll grab an old gaming mouse and shortcut them to the extra buttons.

        They finally implemented never combine on the taskbar, and it’s…tolerable, but buggy and still resizes things for no reason

        Unfortunately I’ve yet to find a way to get some damn 90° angles back. I can not wait for a few years down the line when we finally swing away from this Apple-chasing “bubbles with an inch between them on a white/black field” design aesthetic. I’m tired of everything looking like a toy, especially at the cost of its actual utility.

        And not just a toy, the same toy. It’s seriously Corporate Memphis levels of lifeless, forced design with no character, creativity, or ingenuity.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 months ago

          Forced to use it at work, too, and only by the grace of being in the IT department do I have the ability to make it less shitty.

          I’m a user 🤮 and the IT on my Japanese employer is run by Mordac the Information Preventer. FML.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        This has been exactly my stance as well apart from ever having used Win11. Never did and never plan to, downloaded Mint a few months ago to start getting familiar with it. Turns out I’m not real great at technical stuff but I’m getting there. Dual monitors was kind of a booger and now I’m trying to figure out how to install some games since Bottles is being a real wiener about Battle.Net. I’m glad there’s so many resources and forums out there but I still hope some version of Linux gets dumbed down a little more before Win10 sunsets to make the transition easier for us blue collar folk

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I had problem with bottles and battle.net too. It went flawless year ago, then I went to play other games and when I finally wanted to play Diablo 2 again, battle.net kept crashing all the time. I solved it by running that bottle in wine-ge. Easier way to get it (and manage such prefixes) is ProtonUp-qt that is also on flathub.

        • BombOmOm
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          For games, running stuff through Steam makes things much easier, as it configures Proton for you automatically. Also check out https://www.protondb.com/ for ratings and help with specific games.