Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders ’ office potentially violated state laws on purchasing, state property and government records when it purchased a $19,000 lectern for the Republican governor that’s prompted nationwide attention, an audit requested by lawmakers said Monday.

Legislative auditors referred the findings in the long-awaited audit of the lectern to local prosecutors and the attorney general, and lawmakers planned to hold a hearing Tuesday on the report. The report cited several potential legal violations, including paying for the lectern before it was delivered and the handling of records regarding the purchase.

Sanders’ office, which has dismissed questions about the lectern, called the audit’s findings “deeply flawed” and a “waste of taxpayer resources and time.”

  • ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    65
    ·
    11 months ago

    How the hell did that thing cost $19k? It looks like something you’d get from a 1970s Ikea.

    Ohh right… Nepotism and/or money laundering!

    • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      11 months ago

      None of the above. It was used to hide improper/illegal expenditures. If I recall correctly it was vacation expenses, or something else that stupid. Basically lecturn cost $1k or $2k, and the rest got funneled back to cover those costs.

      • modeler
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        11 months ago

        That lectern as pictured is a cheap copy worth way less than $1000. The allegation is that she paid her friend for costs of a trip to Paris of which there are social media photos at expensive nightlife locations.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s…. Pretty much text book money laundering.

        • Cornelius_Wangenheim
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s embezzlement. Money laundering is taking illegally acquired money and making it appear to be legitimate.

        • circuscritic@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          It has literally nothing to do with money laundering.

          It’s theft/embezzlement, and probably some other financial fraud related crimes, none of which are money laundering.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            Not exactly.

            They could have just straight up embezzled it. The purpose of buying something overpriced is to make that purchase seem reasonable on a line item.

            The lectern itself is money laundering to cover up embezzlement, yes. Because some one is gonna notice 15k missing pretty quickly.

      • AnUnusualRelic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        It’s not just any lectern, it’s an advanced lectern. You can put papers on it and stuff, it can even hold a microphone!

  • ParabolicMotion
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I’d be looking into what company manufactures that $19,000 lectern and then research who owns that company. There is a reason someone shells out that much money on a typically cheap item.

    Edit: Here is a link to the profile of the CEO of Beckett Events (company that sold the $19,000 podium). https://www.linkedin.com/in/virginia-beckett-3a940423

    • etceterar@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      11 months ago

      She “bought” the lectern from a friend of hers, then she and the friend took a trip to Paris with the money (is the word on the street in Little Rock).

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Lecterns aren’t inexpensive. A good one will go for 2-5k, easy.

      Though they are far from 19k. Iirc, the guy is a friend of the goobenor, and that one goes for line 500 on Amazon.

      • Flying Squid
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        11 months ago

        Though they are far from 19k.

        You’re leaving out the blue paint. That probably cost at least $10,000. It definitely doesn’t look like they got the cheapest color at Walmart.

  • bulwark
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    What if it was a really fancy lectern?

    • Flying Squid
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      If you steal a lectern, it doesn’t cost $19,000. This was Sarah’s mistake.

      • ClanOfTheOcho
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 months ago

        Steal a $19,000 lectern? Nah, bro.

        Steal $19,000 through buying overpriced office equipment with company funds from a friend who takes you on a fine Parisean experience with the profits? Yeah, boy!

    • Asafum@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      But that’s exactly why she got the job. The people who voted for her despise “the media” and live in Trump Reality™ so they love her for her Truth Telling™

    • Jackcooper
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Recognizeable last name means a lot when we never vote out incumbants

      Look at all these shows from the 90s talking about future president Chelsea Clinton or how some wanted Michelle Obama to be president. I’m honestly amazed Jeb Bush didn’t get elected … but that came down to a more famous person bullying him I guess

  • Starkstruck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 months ago

    They could’ve at least tried to hide the blatant money laundering with a nicer looking lectern. That thing looks straight out of a church basement from the 1970s.

  • blazera
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    Its an audit, they know the law was violated. Theyre just not prosecutors.

  • badbytes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    Turns out financial fraud, really is a crime.

  • plantedworld
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    That lectern isn’t even wide enough to effectively hide an awkward boner from the whole room. Not the edges anyway. Poor design

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Curves like that are always harder than simple angles. There had to be some level of skill involved. Not $17k in skill, though.

      It also doesn’t match its surroundings in any way, and it just plain tasteless.

    • ClanOfTheOcho
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Best I can do is $7.50. Act now, and I’ll throw in a pack of gum to seal the deal.

  • cybervseas
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    11 months ago

    “Deeply flawed” and “a waste of taxpayer resources and time” seems to describe her governorship better.

  • Feathercrown
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    My office, which knows Sanders’ office is covering up a different purchase, called the audit’s findings “encouraging” and “justice for taxpayers and voters”

  • BigMacHole@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Using MY money to Break Laws is MUCH more Preferable then having a Black Man run the state!

    -Not Racist Republicans.