• @xodoh74984
    link
    English
    122
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Who exactly was hyped about this?

    Personally, I typically want my interactions with technology to be quiet. I don’t want it talking, and I don’t want to be talking to it.

    Not to mention the privacy implications of an always-on camera and microphone connected to the internet

    • BruceTwarzen
      link
      fedilink
      262 months ago

      Yeah i don’t know. From everything i ever read or seen about it month ago, everyone seemed to agree that it’s proper shit.

    • @Buffalox
      link
      English
      25
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Who exactly was hyped about this?

      IDK Trekkies maybe? Except it’s shaped wrong, and beaming up doesn’t work.
      If they manage that, maybe there’s a market. 😋

    • LiveLM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      Do keep in mind the microphone is only on when you touch the touchpad, this device doesn’t use “wake words” like Alexa, Google Assistant, etc

      • DdCno1
        link
        fedilink
        192 months ago

        One of few good aspects about it, but only if you don’t think about it too much. The question remains is if you can actually trust this, because there is no physical button disconnecting microphone and camera. It’s all just in software and could be unsafe.

          • DdCno1
            link
            fedilink
            32 months ago

            You can make the camera blind with a sticker or one of those slidey cover things, although it’s much more annoying since that fad of cut outs for cameras has started.

            Also, like I said in the other comment, my phone isn’t attached to my chest like a body cam and constantly in a position to film everything in the room. If the NSA wants to see my feet, the ceiling or my face, they are free to do so.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            02 months ago

            Except if the OS is open-source and was proven to not have such spontaneous functionality.

        • @asbestos
          link
          English
          1
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Same goes with your phone, unfortunately

          • phi1997
            link
            fedilink
            22 months ago

            The fewer devices listening in on me, the better.

          • DdCno1
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Sure, but at least my phone doesn’t have a wide-angle lens that could be constantly filming everything, because it’s attached to my chest.

  • @blattrules
    link
    English
    552 months ago

    I could have told them this was a dumb idea from the start; creating something that doesn’t fill a need, is just another device to carry around and could just be an app on a phone that we already carry around, just to cram it down people’s throats “because AI,” is probably not a good business plan.

    • @RupeThereItIs
      link
      English
      262 months ago

      Because AI is the new because blockchain.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      17
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      It got funded to the tune of $240m. Which was probably about as far as they thought this through.

      • @blattrules
        link
        English
        12 months ago

        Yeah, I can’t imagine they thought this would be a serious product.

    • @Ydna
      link
      English
      152 months ago

      … and require a subscription too!

      • @blattrules
        link
        English
        92 months ago

        Wow, I didn’t even realize that it requires a $24.99 per month plan from T-Mobile for voice, texting and data. These companies are getting really brazen.

    • @toofpic
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      If you add a strap to it, it will be smartwatch. So there’s a need and a niche, just not for one more way to do the same stuff

      • @blattrules
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        That’s not a bad idea, but why not just integrate that functionality into a smartwatch?

        • @toofpic
          link
          English
          62 months ago

          This is exactly what I meant: they’re selling a watch without a strap, and saying it’s something new

        • Tar_Alcaran
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          How are you going to sell that? It already exists, so it won’t draw venture capital that you can siphon off until the whole thing collapses.

    • @flop_leash_973
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      This pretty well describes smart watches in my mind outside of those that need to keep track of certain vitals all of the time as well.

      • @blattrules
        link
        English
        32 months ago

        I used to feel the same, but they do fit a bit of a need for me. They work great as a silent alarm so you don’t wake up anyone else in your room, you don’t have to take your phone out to check time or notifications, and health and fitness tracking is better than what a phone can offer.

  • @callmepk
    link
    English
    52
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Business people see the word AI mentioned in the products: invest invest invest! Business people see AI products hit with honest tech reviews: thoSe PEAsants aRE RUIning ThE InnOVATIOn

    • @thehatfox
      link
      English
      72 months ago

      Terrible products like this might end poisoning the well for genuinely useful AI projects further down the line. “AI” will loose it’s buzz and instead become synonymous with failure to consumers and investors alike.

    • @TurboDiesel
      link
      English
      71
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Marques is right. I’m sorry, for $700 goddamn dollars I refuse to be some random startup’s R&D. I can’t wait for the DiSrUpToR model to die a painful death.

      And to all the people crying because MKBHD was mean, I say: STFU. I watch him for his integrity. Your product is bad and you should feel bad.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        You can’t be mean to a company. Companies don’t have feelings. Fuck a company if it sucks. Fuck most companies, honestly. No company would go out of its way for me. It will lie to me, take my money…in fact, that’s its only function.: to take my money, by lying if necessary. If it doesn’t take my money, it fails as a company. That’s its prime directive.

        So…fuck any company.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Yup, I didn’t watch his review, but I watched his video about the review, and he’s 100% right. If your product sucks, expect to get bad reviews. If your product is good, expect to get good reviews. If you’re getting bad reviews and you know your product is good, talk with the reviewers to figure out what happened.

        MKBHD’s reviews are fantastic. I’ve never once felt I’m being sold to, and I’ve always left feeling more educated about the product. Top notch if you ask me.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        5
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Only if you had tried to hide what Streisand effect is, we could’ve had Streisand effect of Streisand effect.

        Edit: Don’t watch much review videos, hadn’t even heard of the guy. Looked up the video, and ended up subscribing to his channel 😀 At least he is getting free publicity with it.

    • kimjongunderdog
      link
      fedilink
      182 months ago

      Hey, I just watched the video on youtube last night. He started off with the good things such as the physical design of the device, or the interesting way it can project a laser image on your hand, but after that, it was all downhill.

  • @JeffreyOrange
    link
    English
    372 months ago

    “much hyped” lol I have seen not one person who was positively looking forward to this. I don’t really know why such dead in the water stupid idead even get any media attention at all.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -22 months ago

      I thought it sounded neat, but I’m actively looking for a fun way to ditch regular smartphones. As soon as that rotary cell phone works on regular networks, I’m there.

      • @JeffreyOrange
        link
        English
        42 months ago

        I guess if the AI works well, it could have some niche uses. But as far as I have seen it doesn’t. It is also more marketed as a smartphone replacement, which for the vast majority of people it just wouldn’t be. Also the demo examples like booking flights are just moronic.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Yeah the product they delivered is clearly not what was promised. I lost interest as soon as the subscription model was made obvious.

          Personally I’d just like my phone to allow others to contact me and search the internet, that’s all. I don’t need to text constantly, and other than lemmy I have no social media presence. Laser-display voice-control smart-broach actually fits the bill for me, provided it actually fucken worked at all lmao

          Also I just really like weird or novel tech. I was an early supporter of pebble and the only thing I regret there is not buying doubles.

          • @JeffreyOrange
            link
            English
            112 months ago

            I honestly dislike voice control very much. Would be pretty annoying to constantly have people around who are talking to their devices. It’s already jarring enough when you are a gust at somebodys home and they scream at their alexa every couple minutes, ruins the mood a little bit.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 months ago

              God I hadn’t even considered what “voice control only” would mean for public spaces. You’re right, that sounds like a nightmare.

  • @snekerpimp
    link
    English
    302 months ago

    Ummm… really? The technology is nowhere near the hype they are putting behind it. Just some AI snake oil salesmen. The next few years will be filled with “ai” e-waste as people use the buzzword to sell garbage.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    232 months ago

    Major problem with the gadget is the same as all AI. You can tell it to perform tasks as long as the task doesn’t have any specific requirements to how you want it done and if you inevitably do have requirements its faster to do it yourself.

    • @Diplomjodler3
      link
      English
      242 months ago

      The main problem with the gadget is that it just doesn’t work very well.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -32 months ago

        It works as well as any other AI product. The reason this works particularly bad is because it fully relies on the AI to function.

        • @Diplomjodler3
          link
          English
          102 months ago

          There are a lot of AI products that work very well. Only people usually stop calling it AI once it works.

        • Echo Dot
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          The AI that this product contains is especially bad. It’s slow, often just doesn’t work, and cannot do simple things like speech recognition at all reliably

  • @hahattpro
    link
    English
    142 months ago

    nad, an cheap Android phone for less than $200 can do the job.

    • DdCno1
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      My first Android phone from 2010 was better at this and it didn’t even have multitouch and just 160 MB of usable storage.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 months ago

    You can’t just mention AI in a device description and expect people to buy it in flocks.

    • @snekerpimp
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      But you can, look at Nvidia

        • @snekerpimp
          link
          English
          62 months ago

          Ehhhh… Nvidia stumbled upon the fact that their specialized silicon does very well with AI tasks. And yes, their software stack is leagues ahead of anyone else. But they are completely riding the “AI” buzzword popularity wave, and their overinflated stock price is evidence of that. This is just my honest opinion, having no background in any of this, just a casual dabbler and tech enthusiast.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        My favorite was their calling their shield upscaling algorithm “AI”. It’s a fixed non-dynamic algorithm like any other, but they did use AI to make rapid iterative improvements during the development of the algorithm.

        • @snekerpimp
          link
          English
          0
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Current LLMs agi are no where near what a definition of “AI” is, yet all are being market as “AI”. It is just a buzzword. Like “synergy” and “cloud”. It has lost its meaning.

          edit: confuzzled my buzzwords

            • @snekerpimp
              link
              English
              12 months ago

              Yes, thank you. I don’t do buzzwords well

    • @IsThisAnAI
      link
      English
      22 months ago

      Yes you can, when it works.

  • @exanime
    link
    English
    62 months ago

    Good preview of most “AI” products being peddled by force