I can’t help but think of this.

  • molten
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 months ago

    Hey, at least they’re transparent.

    • pivot_root
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      You’re right, that’s unrealistic.

      If those stall dividers were fully opaque with a one-way mirror acting as the wall behind them all, that would be more like it.

  • db2
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 months ago

    Actual nightmare material.

    • NightAuthor
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      11 months ago

      I’m pretty sure this has that fancy transitioning glass, when you lock the door it goes opaque.

      • TurboWafflz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        11 months ago

        Hmm, what happens if there’s a power outage? Or is dark the default state and it needs power to be clear?

        • Cort
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          ·
          11 months ago

          Needs power to go clear, otherwise opaque/frosted

      • jaybone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        That’s what they want you to believe.

    • red_rising
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      One persons nightmare is another persons fetish.

  • Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just like those “we value your privacy” cookie banners that don’t give you the option to reject all. If they truly valued my privacy, they would give me that option instead of having me toggle off 500000 “partners” one by one in the hopes I accidentally skip one. Bastards.

    • spongebue
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      11 months ago

      Or just… Not have 500000 partners in the first place

      • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 months ago

        I just decide that any site doing that doesn’t really have anything meaningful to provide and has mostly copy-pasted content from actual resource-providing websites, with added SEO.
        So I just close the site most of the time.

        So far it has paid off. I tend to find more sites that give information that was actually written by someone knowledgable about the field.
        Thinking I should start making my own list, considering search engines are probably never going to make those easier to find.

    • blackn1ght@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      Those aren’t compliant. The reject all needs to be as prominent as the accept all option without any additional clicks. So many sites get it wrong it’s insane!

      • ඞmir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        So many sites get it wrong

        If they get away with it, they very much got it right

    • HereIAm
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 months ago

      It is honestly disgusting when they list the number of parties, especially when you see 100+ vendors on the “Legitimate purpose” toggle. Fuck off you have a legitimate purpose to my browsing.

  • J3K@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 months ago

    “We value our customers’ privacy - it’s our main revenue stream!”

  • Altima NEO@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    11 months ago

    Lately, all Ive been getting are changes involving arbitration. Shit, I even got one from a fucking grocery store app.

  • asteriskeverything
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    I tend to always read these, both when I sign up and when there are changes. Idk if I ever felt that it changed significantly at all from what I expected originally. They are “updated” annually and when a new law passes so usually it is no change or something about the new law. Basically usually if you consented to the original privacy policy, updates are unlikely to have anything surprising and new to change your mind. I guess unless it went from none to some/a lot of shared data!

  • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    I know this bathroom, they have the stalls, you sit down and your head peeks over the top of the walls. I guess they expected everyone to be very short? I’m not even six foot so I don’t know. I think of it as the social shitter.

    If I remember, it’s pink.

    • WashedOver@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s public washrooms like this in a mall in Seattle, or at least there was a few years back. Half height stalls. When one is sitting the walls only come up to your elbows. One of the most bizarre setups for a public bathroom I’ve seen in my travels.