• @OlinOfTheHillPeople
      link
      206 months ago

      I wonder how sequestered the jurors are. Do they even have Internet access?

        • @0110010001100010
          link
          23
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Not only that, but if any of them are on any kind of social media AT ALL or hell even listen to the radio or watch TV it seems like it would be damn near impossible to avoid a random headline here and there. This trial has been covered ad nauseam by both US-based and international news outlets. Hell on a Windows PC if you open up Bing with the default settings you get a news page in your face.

          • Echo Dot
            link
            fedilink
            96 months ago

            if you open up Bing with the default settings you get a news page in your face.

            Let’s try to keep things in the bounds of plausibility here…

      • @BertramDitore
        link
        English
        156 months ago

        They’re not sequestered. If they were, they’d be stuck in a hotel somewhere without internet access. It’s super rare, but you’d think this case of all cases would qualify for that level of isolation. There’s probably a good reason not to, I mean imagine the logistics for the 12 jurors and all the alternates (6, I think). Most people can’t just disappear from their lives for a month. That said, it’s a Manhattan jury, so they know this fool regardless.

    • SolidGrue
      link
      English
      106 months ago

      By the letter and spirit of the law they can’t have read about it because the Judge said not to, and so there CAN’T be tampering charges, right? Right??

    • @Archer
      link
      76 months ago

      I would like to point to the Clown Code of Ethics, which ironically is stricter than the Supreme Court’s. Although Clarence Thomas is making an excellent attempt at number 7

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    686 months ago

    “Yea well… my dad would’ve whopped all their asses but they didn’t fight fair!”

    What the literal fuck is he on about? Donald Trump is expected to stand up to foreign leaders but pussies out in front of a fucking jury?

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      English
      246 months ago

      It’s not a crime to lie to foreign dignitaries.

    • Flying Squid
      link
      106 months ago

      Foreign leaders famously fight fair.

  • HuddaBudda
    link
    fedilink
    56
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The jury haven’t even made a ruling yet… All they’ve done is listen…

    “You are going into a kangaroo court. There’s nothing more. Nothing less. There’d be absolutely no reason, no justification to do that whatsoever.” - Donald Trump Jr.

    Not even an excuse? , if the jury only has one side of the story that is what they are going with.

    If you aren’t even going to put your fists up and spend all your time arguing with the referee, you can’t complain when you get KO’ed

  • @Hobbes_Dent
    link
    396 months ago

    He would have testified if it wasn’t for that meddling jury of his peers.

  • Capt. Wolf
    link
    316 months ago

    Somebody tell this clown to shut up.

    • @PlasticExistence
      link
      English
      66 months ago

      You gotta buck up, man, you cannot drag this negative energy into the tournament

    • @jaybone
      link
      16 months ago

      Donny, you’re out of your element.

  • @PlantDadManGuy
    link
    296 months ago

    I don’t give a single shit what this festering cunt cabbage has to say. He was born from shit, made of shit, and big surprise, he’s still full of shit.

  • @Got_Bent
    link
    256 months ago

    Why would you justify this insanity? Look at the clowns that they put on there — you don’t subject yourself to that nonsense," he said, evidently speaking of the jury.

    Both sides had ample opportunity to vet potential jurors. Your side is just as responsible for its makeup as anybody.

    • @Delusional
      link
      106 months ago

      Yeah but the idiotic republican voters won’t ever know that and even if they were told that, they wouldn’t believe it.

    • @barsquid
      link
      66 months ago

      Just crybabies whining that they didn’t get infinite vetoes and delays.

  • @Furbag
    link
    96 months ago

    Legally, the jury cannot interpret Trump’s refusal to testify as evidence of wrongdoing, as that would violate his constitutional right against self incrimination.

    …but I can! And you know what my hot take is? Not testifying in your own defense and then crying about it afterwards is a pussy ass bitch move and the hallmark of a guilty liar.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    76 months ago

    Because endearing yourself to the people who will decide your father’s fate is just courtroom 101.