The long-awaited day is here: Apple has announced that its Messages app will support RCS in iOS 18. The move comes after years of taunting, cajoling, and finally, some regulatory scrutiny from the EU.

Right now, when people on iOS and Android message each other, the service falls back to SMS — photos and videos are sent at a lower quality, messages are shortened, and importantly, conversations are not end-to-end encrypted like they are in iMessage. Messages from Android phones show up as green bubbles in iMessage chats and chaos ensues.

Apple’s announcement was likely an effort to appease EU regulators.

  • @anon_8675309
    link
    English
    245 days ago

    I know people want this. I do to. But SMS going away will suck. Even in 2024, there’s still that moment you have every now and then that you can’t get a call out but a sms will make it out just fine. SMS rides along with the carriers ping signal. It’s not part of the data signal.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      215 days ago

      Right now my phone gives me the option if RCS fails for some reason, to send the message again with SMS. I assume that will be the case here as well.

    • @solarbabies
      link
      English
      145 days ago

      Google Messages app already falls back to SMS automatically if RCS fails. SMS is not going anywhere.

    • @RubberElectrons
      link
      English
      17
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I don’t think sms will go away, that ping is fundamental to GSM & LTE so far as I can tell.

      You may need an app that explicitly taps into the sms feature though

  • Jilanico
    link
    English
    886 days ago

    What if they kept the green color just to troll…

    • @extremeboredom
      link
      English
      128
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      They probably will. They’re aware of and actively foster the “in-group” psychology that plays out in youth social circles. Anyone with a non-Apple phone is excluded as lower class, weird, or less-than. You don’t get included in the group chats that are often the center of your peers’ social lives because no one wants the annoyance of dealing with the limitations of conversing with a green bubble. You must conform, purchase the correct products, and sign over your life to the correct social media platforms if you want to participate in society.

      • @cm0002
        link
        English
        346 days ago

        Yea, but the real question is will the youth see through the BS or not? Before it wasn’t just a color, green bubbles actively broke things in blue bubble group chats

        But once that’s gone with (hopefully) the rollout of RCS (which should fix most, if not all, the things that broke gcs) it really would be “just a color”

        Ofc, Apple being Apple, I wouldn’t put it past them to artificially “break” things or arbitrarily introduce limits between RCS and iMessage

        • @extremeboredom
          link
          English
          266 days ago

          Ofc, Apple being Apple, I wouldn’t put it past them to artificially “break” things or arbitrarily introduce limits between RCS and iMessage

          That’s where my money is

        • @thehatfox
          link
          English
          146 days ago

          Ofc, Apple being Apple, I wouldn’t put it past them to artificially “break” things or arbitrarily introduce limits between RCS and iMessage

          I’m guessing RCS support will be as barebones as possible while still technically functioning. All of the fancy bells and whistles will remain exclusive to iMessage.

          Some iMessage features might not be possible to implement with RCS I suppose. Maybe RCS messages will get a different colour. All Apple said in the WWDC keynote was RCS would be supported, they didn’t elaborate any further.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            26 days ago

            Apple is bringing RCS because China is requiring it, not because of what google has done. So I don’t expect it to be bare bones in that case since a huge market of theirs will be phasing out sms in the foreseeable future.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          5 days ago

          One of two things can happen…

          Either Apple does the bare minimum to implement RCS, continuing to make interoperability a pain in the ass. Meanwhile, keep making improvements to iMessage.

          Or Apple does it right, fully implements RCS, contributes back to the standard, and abandons iMessage as maintaining two separate platforms for the same function is a waste of resources.

          I’ll take a guess as to which it’ll be.

          Alternatively Americans just accept using 3rd party messengers. But that field is huge with big and small names competing, and ultimately anything that displaces FB messenger or WhatsApp will just get bought by Meta (or some other FAANG) and we’re back at square-one.

          Everybody just remember that Apple is the stubborn ones here, reluctantly adopting the standard that every other OEM has been using for a decade, and the reason they’ve been doing this was as a means to keep people in Apple’s walled garden by “othering” people who don’t have iMessage.

          They knew exactly what they were doing. I got rid of my iPhone to go back to Android literally a week after the original announcement. Exchanging multimedia with my wife was literally the only thing holding me to iOS. The alternative, using third party messengers, is just plain cumbersome for one user (and likely means selling your soul to Meta nowadays, anyway).

          I doubt I’m alone.

          And RCS is a neutral standard, belonging to GSMA. Even though Google is a key player, they aren’t the only ones. Any phone OS or OEM could always have implemented RCS. Apple has historically chosen not to, while also not reciprocating the openness with iMessage.

          I guess there is one other possibility…Apple embraces RCS and, being keenly aware of its limitations and with Apple and Android cooperating, they collaborate to develop a new open standard that fully replaces both. That’s probably the best outcome but also least likely to happen.

        • @Stupidmanager
          link
          English
          15 days ago

          Next up, ios20 will let you change the color of your fried chat bubble in groups. And it’ll be the most innovative inclusion “evarrrhh”.

      • @Repelle
        link
        English
        106 days ago

        It’s super useful to know instantly if the messages are encrypted or not.

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          English
          116 days ago

          Exactly. Encryption is coming later.

          Also, there are iMessage specific features that are not part of RCS, so knowing what platform someone is on is still useful for cross platform communication.

      • Kairos
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 days ago

        They are we got confirmation months ago

      • @errer
        link
        English
        36 days ago

        There’s a few things that are iOS device specific (like FaceTime) so I can see legit reasons to keep the different colors, if that’s what everyone is used to. Not that video calling should be a random proprietary tech, but that’s another battle…

        • @kbotc
          link
          English
          56 days ago

          Apple wanted to open source FaceTime and destroy Skype. They got sued and were not allowed to open source their protocols. It’s real dumb that Apple didn’t get to drive the standards there.

            • @kbotc
              link
              English
              56 days ago

              Steve Jobs loudly announced FaceTime would be made open source. Then they lost a patent lawsuit against https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-20236114

              Apple paid up and could keep using the patent, but could not just let anyone else use the tech they developed as it now needed a non-open license.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown
      link
      fedilink
      386 days ago

      It’s not just to troll. There are actual differences between the RCS and iMessage protocols and their capabilities.

      • atocci
        link
        English
        -86 days ago

        Sure, but we all know what the real reason is…

        • @ForgotAboutDre
          link
          English
          166 days ago

          It would be inappropriate to not make it clear what messaging protocol is being used.

          Most RCS chats will be going through googles servers. A user might want to know that.

          • atocci
            link
            English
            13
            edit-2
            6 days ago

            I absolutely agree on that. It should be clear to the user what protocol is being used, but that isn’t Apple’s goal. If that was the case, the bubble for RCS messages would be something other than green since green currently indicates SMS. The way they’re doing it, making RCS bubbles green too won’t do anything to tell you what protocol you’re using, but it will specifically reveal you aren’t using iMessage, and continuing that in-group mentality is the goal.

          • Quantum Cog
            link
            English
            96 days ago

            No, apple is not using Google’s proprietary RCS they are using Open Source GSM RCS which doesn’t go through Google’s servers and it doesn’t include end-to-end encryption.

            • @ForgotAboutDre
              link
              English
              25 days ago

              What if you speak to someone on android, then it’ll most likely go through googles servers. Most carriers are using googles servers to service rcs. When you texting iPhone users you’ll be using iMessage so most of the time your going through googles servers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 days ago

            ABSOLUTELY. I have way more trust in iMessage’s privacy than RCS. I am ELATED for this change, but I want the colors different. I wouldn’t be upset if it changed from green to something else like peach or something, though, to reflect at least there might be SOME encryption or something going on.

            • @ozymandias117
              link
              English
              56 days ago

              If you’re relying on iMessage for privacy, ensure you and everyone you’re messaging have gone to iCloud settings and enabled “Advanced Data Protection”

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                6 days ago

                Absolutely, and excellent advice. Most of my folks I talk about

                pirated

                Uhh

                movies

                we’ll just say THC cuz it’s legal here

                with, whether it enabled or not, we go through Signal iPhone or Android

                edit: I read this again and it’s a terribly worded post but I think ya get it

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        Image for the lazy (and yes, of course, Apple’s breaking their own accessibility guideline of having text at least 3:1 contrast ratio for text to be readable and instead making it 2:1 by picking the lightest shade of green possible).

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      English
      176 days ago

      The bubbles will remain green. At the very least, it’s handy a hand way to tell if chat is unencrypted.

        • Ghostalmedia
          link
          English
          316 days ago

          Encryption was never part of the RCS standard, and Google has been gatekeeping the encryption solution that they’ve been using… which is why there aren’t a lot of E2EE RCS clients floating around.

          Google finally conceded several months ago, and now encryption will be part of RCS and managed by an independent working group that Google, Apple, and others can contribute to.

          Phase 1 of RCS is about implementing the unencrypted foundation of the protocol. Encryption is supposed to come when the working group has aligned.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            176 days ago

            Encryption is supposed to come when the working group has aligned.

            I wouldn’t hold my breath.

            The whole RCS thing is a Bad Idea™ . It’s a standard by the GSM Association, which consists of over 1150 members (750 operators and 400 other companies). Getting all these companies to align will take forever.

            To illustrate: the RCS initiative was started in 2007 and the steering committee was formed in early 2008. The first version of the Universal Profile, that would enable interoperability between different operators and networks was released in 2016. It took 8 f-ing years to come up with an interoperable messaging standard to replace SMS. It was intended to be implemented by operators, but since hardly any operator did Google had to run their own service, bypassing the network operators, just to get it off the ground. Operators are now slowly beginning to support it.

            If Apple decides to add a feature to iMessage, they implement the feature, roll out an update to their servers and release it to a billion users in the next iOS update. If they want to add a feature to RCS, they first have to discuss it in the committee until they agree on a solution, this alone takes forever. Then every player needs to update their software to add support. This means potentially 750 operators who need to update their shit, and that is after their software suppliers add support for it. In the mean time, the new feature will work for some users when they communicate with some other users, depending on which phone and operator each party has. Rinse and repeat for every new feature you want to add.

            This means RCS will at best only ever be a very basic messaging service. It’ll be an improvement over SMS and MMS, but that’s not saying much. It will be in no way a threat to Apple’s dominance in messaging.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              66 days ago

              Thank you for detailing what’s wrong with RCS.

              It’s too little, too late, with major issues.

              I was running XMPP on my phone in 2009…

        • CO5MO ✨
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 days ago

          That’s what I’m curious abt, as well. Will RCS to iMessage be e2ee?? 🧐

    • circuitfarmer
      link
      fedilink
      English
      75 days ago

      100% they will do this.

      But I wonder if the effect will be different to now. I know Apple wants to retain the idea that their users are in an exclusive blue bubble group. But currently, green bubbles are associated with shitty looking images, video, etc, due to MMS. Especially for people that don’t know why files come through that way, green bubbles are always presented as inferior by virtue of actually being inferior.

      But now, if they do keep the green bubs, they’ll just be green. Green at feature parity is different from green with clear differences.

    • @JeeBaiChow
      link
      English
      96 days ago

      Sounds like it just replaces sms as the default method to communicate with androids. So it’s very likely the bubbles will remain differently colored.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 days ago

      They almost certainly will. That blue is a prestige feature for a lot of people.

      I don’t really care, so long as I can easily send texts and pictures back and forth, I’ll be happy.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      56 days ago

      Honestly that will be the least of your concerns. I will be very surprised if it’s anything more than basic interoperability. Photos and videos and such. Probably not even group text. Apple will comply maliciously just like they are with app stores. You’ll have to drag them kicking and screaming.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    696 days ago

    Apple could easily do the bare minimum to keep regulators at bay while still keeping the experience as shitty as possible so that Android will continue to look bad. For example they could refuse to implement reactions or typing indicators, or they could even deliberately compress videos. I’m expecting the worst until we see otherwise.

    • atocci
      link
      English
      34
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      This is exactly what I’m expecting. The company of “buy your mom an iPhone” isn’t going to be aiming for maximum interoperability.

        • @TheGrandNagus
          link
          English
          35 days ago

          The EU is fine with iMessage shenanigans, because they’re not a significant enough part of the market to matter. Nobody uses SMS either.

          It’s WhatsApp all the way here.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          26 days ago

          No, they’ll aim for minimum interoperability that the EU will let them get away with, and they’ll push that line every chance they get

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      196 days ago

      For example they could refuse to implement reactions or typing indicators

      Reactions already work in MMS groups, use them every day.

      or they could even deliberately compress videos

      Except they’re already advertising improved quality of photos and video in non-iMessage chats. Doubt they would advertise a specific feature only to make it worse.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -26 days ago

      Not to criticise apple too badly here, but that’s what will happen, as the version of RCS they use won’t have E2EE.

      And… It’ll still be tied to your phone number. Why would I want another shitty messaging system that’s tied to my phone number?

      • @RGB3x3
        link
        English
        176 days ago

        It’s the replacement for SMS… Are you upset that WiFi phone calls are tied to your phone number?

  • @dorumon
    link
    English
    145 days ago

    Man it’s a shame that Google RCS doesn’t run on android phones by default if you have a custom rom or rooted your device or have an unlocked bootloader. Guess this won’t really affect me then and it doesn’t really matter.

    • cum
      link
      fedilink
      English
      115 hours ago

      Yeah really wish there was a single FOSS alternative that supported RCS. Hard to call it an open protocol when pretty much just Google Messages supports it.

      • @dorumon
        link
        English
        114 hours ago

        Yeah same here! But I think google is trying to monopolize RCS at the moment and there are really no good alternatives especially here in the United States that people are willing to use because its just attached to a phone number and you don’t have to think about it.

  • @theherk
    link
    English
    416 days ago

    I loved how blasé he mentioned it and moved right along. It is a pretty big announcement and I’m glad they are finally doing it. It will benefit many even if only indirectly.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -57
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      It’s a terrible move, especially to make it default.

      It’s just as bad a protocol as SMS in its own way:

      It’s still tied to a phone number/sim, so you can’t just login to the service via a browser or an app.

      It has lots of failures, worst of all, SILENT FAILURES, where you don’t even know your messages aren’t being sent - just look at the communities around here discussing it.

      There’s no common protocol here really, lots of parts work only by decree of each host (e.g. iOS won’t have E2EE with anyone not on iOS, because that requires every cell provider to agree to the config they’re going to use.

      This is the 21st century, and this is the best they can do - a protocol that fails with no notice? Without standardized encryption? That’s tied to hardware?

      I had a better experience in 2009 running Pidgin on my phone and my laptop using XMPP. That didn’t require a phone number - I could login and see my messages in both places simultaneously… 15 years ago.

      No, RCS is a way to make the plebes think they’ve got a new and better system while still delivering garbage.

      Love you downvoters that don’t know enough to argue, just drive by and downvote.

      ONE person had the guts to say why he disagreed with me.

      Nevermind that BorgDrone explained what’s wrong with RCS better than I care to. You drive-by downvoters can’t even be bothered to learn about RCS.

      RCS is garbage. Plain and simple. I will never allow it on my devices, just like with Whatsapp, Facecrap, Twitter, Instagram, etc.

      • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        636 days ago

        It’s a terrible move, especially to make it default.

        Subjective, but lets see what you bring to the table.

        It’s just as bad a protocol as SMS in its own way: It’s still tied to a phone number/sim, so you can’t just login to the service via a browser or an app.

        That’s how text (SMS/RCS) messaging works. Did you expect something different? Did you expect the SMS replacement to not require a phone number?

        It has lots of failures, worst of all, SILENT FAILURES, where you don’t even know your messages aren’t being sent - just look at the communities around here discussing it.

        I’ve been using it without issue for quite a while now, but that’s just one data point. If you have stats to back up your claim, I would love to see that.

        There’s no common protocol here really, …

        “The GSMA’s Universal Profile is a single, industry-agreed set of features and technical enablers developed to simplify the product development and global operator deployment of RCS” Source: https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/technologies/networks/rcs/universal-profile/

        lots of parts work only by decree of each host (e.g. iOS won’t have E2EE with anyone not on iOS, because that requires every cell provider to agree to the config they’re going to use.

        This is how distributed/federated systems work and this is one of their cons. They won’t always be 100% compatible as each component is independent but the goal is to eventually reach feature parity. See Matrix chat clients that didn’t all have encryption (or other features) on day 1 or XMPP which has lots of clients, none of which support all features.

        This is the 21st century, and this is the best they can do - a protocol that fails with no notice? Without standardized encryption? That’s tied to hardware?

        Please post evidence of this. Again, I’ve had zero issues and every Android user is using RCS by default now - have heard zero complaints.

        I had a better experience in 2009 running Pidgin on my phone and my laptop using XMPP. That didn’t require a phone number - I could login and see my messages in both places simultaneously… 15 years ago.

        Correct! XMPP is not an SMS replacement and thus it doesn’t need a phone number. In fact, you can’t “text” an XMPP user, so I’m not sure what you’re complaining about here?

        No, RCS is a way to make the plebes think they’ve got a new and better system while still delivering garbage.

        RCS vastly improves over SMS with the following features:

        • High Quality Multimedia Messaging: Unlike SMS/MMS, which is limited to text and potato sized image/videos, RCS allows sending and receiving photos, videos, and other files at significantly higher quality.
        • Rich Content Sharing: RCS supports sharing richer content formats like GIFs, location sharing, and contact cards.
        • Improved Group Chatting: RCS provides a more feature-rich group chat experience with features like group chat names, adding/removing participants, and seeing who has read messages (with read receipts).
        • Typing Indicators: Similar to many messaging apps, RCS lets you see when someone is typing a message.
        • Improved Message Reliability: RCS messages are sent over data networks, so unlike SMS, they shouldn’t get lost due to network congestion.
        • End-to-End Encryption: RCS can offer end-to-end encryption for chats, providing an extra layer of security for your messages (availability varies by carrier).

        But keep spreading FUD and hating on something that actually moves the needle forward.

        Love you downvoters that don’t know enough to argue, just drive by and downvote.

        I think they’re downvoting you because you’re wrong - plainly wrong - and in this day and age its much easier to bury (downvote) blatantly wrong information than to reply to it. So I’m replying for everyone else but I will not be downvoting you. FUD should be fought back with evidence, but MAAN is it tiring.

        ONE person had the guts to say why he disagreed with me.

        It’s not about guts, its about wasting time, effort, not giving a shit. I slightly give a shit and want people who are less educated on the subject to see the other side of it.

        Nevermind that BorgDrone explained what’s wrong with RCS better than I care to. You drive-by downvoters can’t even be bothered to learn about RCS.

        Nothing to comment on here.

        RCS is garbage. Plain and simple. I will never allow it on my devices, …

        At the end of the day RCS is objectively better than what exists today in the world of carrier messenger services (SMS/MMS). Is it better than iMessage? I don’t think anyone would agree, especially not if you only message other iPhone users. Is it a better out-of-the-box experience for interoperability? Absolutely! And you’re being disingenuous if you disagree, but I’m happy to hear you out.

        just like with Whatsapp, Facecrap, Twitter, Instagram, etc.

        We can agree to these being garbage ✊

        All that said, am I actively going to ask people to use RCS? Never! The same way I wouldn’t ask someone to use iMessage if I had an iPhone. They’re both products developed ultimately to push users into their respective ecosystem to the benefit of Google/Apple/Carriers.

        I’ll stick to Signal and Matrix until something better comes along.

      • JackbyDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        246 days ago

        It’s still tied to a phone number/sim, so you can’t just login to the service via a browser or an app.

        Damn, if only phones had phone numbers and SIM cards… That must really suck for future iPhone users. Apple really dropped the ball.

      • @Feathercrown
        link
        English
        95 days ago

        I’m downvoting you because you whined about downvotes. Letting you know instead of driving by.

      • catsarebadpeople
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 days ago

        Why do we all need to respond when that one user who did respond put you in your place and made it clear that you’re just an angry moron yelling at the sky? Downvotes are exactly what’s called for here. Piss off idiot. You’re getting the exact amount of respect you deserve.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        96 days ago

        But SMS still needs an upgrade, because it’s not going to be killed of if there isn’t a slot-in replacement, and so something has to take its role of being a messaging system where your carrier directly verifies your control of your phone number.

        That’s why RCS exists.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -136 days ago

        Who even uses sms/mms these days? The only cases I see myself using sms is the poorly implemented 2fa over sms, which is bad since sim hijack is a real threat.

        Other than that whatsapp is the norm around here, whether we like it or not. Some also use facebook messanger, but no1 uses mms, it never picked up with the astronomical prices that carriers kept around for no good reason. I wish more people used telegram or signal, but 99% of my contacts don’t, so whatsapp it is.

        • @Meltrax
          link
          English
          146 days ago

          Like 90% of Americans who have android phones use SMS. WhatsApp is more common in places outside the US. Not inside.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          It’s still common in the USA for some reason. I think because SMS has been free for a long time and people don’t like change. Other apps gained popularity elsewhere in the world because SMSes were expensive.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            What is more conveniant about sms compared to other apps? You still have to open the app, choose the contact from the list and start typing. It’s the exact same options. If I do it on the sms app, signal app, telegram or messanger app it’s still the same 2 taps then start typing. The only difference is what’s on the other side. If they only use sms then it’s obvious you have no other choice of communicating with them, but you can’t say it’s more conveniant.

            • @cor315
              link
              English
              45 days ago

              It’s convenient because I don’t have to tell my family to use a different app. It’s hard enough to get them to install whatsapp, let alone actually use it. And I don’t even like using whatsapp.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -3
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          I try not to.

          I’ll happily use one or more of any of dozens of proper modern, network-based messaging systems. A few off the top of my head, none of which must be tied to hardware/sim/phone number (Signal is working on moving away from phone numbers, and it’s still not tied to a phone number the same way RCS is):

          Matrix

          Signal

          Conversations

          Simplex

          Wire

          Or pick an XMPP server and client, there’s plenty out there. I was using XMPP on my phone in 2009, chatting, sending uncompressed videos to people on desktops/laptops.

          Hell, even Telegram is a thousand times better than this RCS garbage.

          Don’t get me started on the privacy nightmare of WhatsApp… Holy shit, may as well not even care about privacy or encryption.

          (I have most of these messaging apps on my phones and my laptop, because they work).

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            46 days ago

            Unfortunately, no matter how good the alternatives are, you are stuck with whatever is on the other end. I can’t force anyone to change their main app for comms. Even if I do manage to get them to install anything else, they will realise they only use it with me and probably drop it next time they change their phone.

            While I do agree whatsapp is a privacy nightmare , I also see why it won’t go away anytime soon. You only need someone’s phone number to contact them, you get easy media transfers although compressed to shit, it’s still serviceable and it’s carier independant, and most importantly free even internationaly. People even started using it for audio calls due to higher quality audio over the plain voice calls. All these reasons create the perfect mix for the average privacy-ignorant person to overlook any competitors.

  • Resol van Lemmy
    link
    English
    64 days ago

    So when are they making FaceTime open source too? That’s what Steve Jobs said when he first announced it.

    Also, FOSS clients for RCS messaging should exist. My only options so far are Google’s messaging app, Samsung’s weird thing, and if I don’t want either, an iPhone. Eh… I’d like more options. Let’s just have all messaging applications support open source protocols, including Signal because why not??

    • @TheGrandNagus
      link
      English
      14 days ago

      And Samsung’s only got approved because it’s Google’s under the skin. A bit like how every browser on iOS is actually Safari.

      RCS is purported to be open, but in practice it really isn’t.

      • Resol van Lemmy
        link
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        That’s just stupid. Kinda like how they never made FaceTime open-source when it was promised to us when it was first announced.

        Wait, I already said this in my initial comment. Damn.

  • GreatAlbatross
    link
    fedilink
    English
    205 days ago

    I’m still of the opinion that the basic message app should only be SMS.
    Then anything else should be its own thing. Mixing the two is a recipe for disaster, where it’s a consumer product.

    • @QuaternionsRock
      link
      English
      265 days ago

      Counterpoint: SMS shouldn’t exist, and RCS is our best shot at replacing it right now

      • @anon_8675309
        link
        English
        145 days ago

        SMS has one feature nothing else does. It’s not data per se. if you can ping a tower you can get a message out. You can’t do that with anything else.

        Makes a difference when you’re out in BFE.

      • @PlusMinus
        link
        English
        105 days ago

        What? SMS is a proven standard that works reliably. Why do we need to replace that? I tried RCS twice, in both cases the other end did not receive my message or at a later time. Even if SMS needed replacement, RCS is not it.

        • @QuaternionsRock
          link
          English
          -14 days ago

          SMS is a proven standard that works reliably.

          lol

          I tried RCS twice, in both cases the other end did not receive my message or at a later time.

          This is not indicative of how well RCS will work as its widespread adoption continues to mature. I do understand your frustration; I just would expect the growing pains to last much longer. Remember how shitty USB C was for the first few years?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 days ago

        Counterpoint: RCS shouldn’t exist either. We should use something that isn’t tied to our mobile service providers.

  • @foggy
    link
    English
    125 days ago

    I just want my gf to have the same SMS app as me so she can see the silly emoji animations I see 😢

    • Liz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I want to be able to turn off those silly animations.

    • @miridius
      link
      English
      65 days ago

      Then why not use the same app?

      • @foggy
        link
        English
        55 days ago

        iOS/Android

        No iOS version of the app I use. Hopefully rcs is the floodgate. 🤞

        She uses generic ass iMessage anyways. She’ll come around :)