In June, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS) signed an acquisition plan for a 5-year, nearly $5.3 million contract for a controversial surveillance tool called Tangles from tech firm PenLink, according to records obtained by the Texas Observer through a public information request. The deal is nearly twice as large as the company’s $2.7 million two-year contract with the federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

Tangles is an artificial intelligence-powered web platform that scrapes information from the open, deep, and dark web. Tangles’ premier add-on feature, WebLoc, is controversial among digital privacy advocates. Any client who purchases access to WebLoc can track different mobile devices’ movements in a specific, virtual area selected by the user, through a capability called “geofencing.” Users of software like Tangles can do this without a search warrant or subpoena. (In a high-profile ruling, the Fifth Circuit recently held that police cannot compel companies like Google to hand over data obtained through geofencing.) Device-tracking services rely on location pings and other personal data pulled from smartphones, usually via in-app advertisers. Surveillance tech companies then buy this information from data brokers and sell access to it as part of their products.

WebLoc can even be used to access a device’s mobile ad ID, a string of numbers and letters that acts as a unique identifier for mobile devices in the ad marketing ecosystem, according to a US Office of Naval Intelligence procurement notice.

Wolfie Christl, a public interest researcher and digital rights activist based in Vienna, Austria, argues that data collected for a specific purpose, such as navigation or dating apps, should not be used by different parties for unrelated reasons. “It’s a disaster,” Christl told the Observer. “It’s the largest possible imaginable decontextualization of data. … This cannot be how our future digital society looks like.”

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240827115133/https://www.texasobserver.org/texas-dps-surveillance-tangle-cobwebs/

  • @qooqie
    link
    English
    984 months ago

    This is something that was going to happen eventually it’s just kind of ironic that it’s a deep red state going for government surveillance like this

      • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        284 months ago

        They need mass surveillance to put down the protests for freedom … errr to protect freedom (white people freedom rich white people freedom).

    • @SlopppyEngineer
      link
      English
      134 months ago

      Red states have more poor, desperate people with guns so better keep them from getting uppity.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      English
      114 months ago

      Totally on brand really. Republicans want to eliminate white collar crime (by never prosecuting it) and catch 110% of blue collar crimes.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice
        link
        English
        124 months ago

        Should gather Abbott’s device id and his families, and post all of their data in a constant stream of location, search results, and such. Soon as his and his families families data is being posted they’ll rethink it as a privacy issue.

  • @Bacano
    link
    English
    744 months ago

    Ahh yes, the freedom loving state. Texas. That’s right.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      As a reminder, Texas has been Republican controlled for roughly 28 years.

      Texas doesn’t have Texan problems; it has Republican ones.

      • @sfxrlz
        link
        English
        24 months ago

        And what would you call that ? A Texas problem. Republicans. Somebody has to vote for the fuckers

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      English
      124 months ago

      I know what you mean by /s but seriously that’s gotta be one of the drivers behind this decision. If Republicans control the state after the next gubernatorial election I could totally see a new law to punish the patient of a abortion (it just targets doctors for now).

  • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    564 months ago

    Remember that one time in Batman where they built a mass surveillance program using phones and decided it was so morally objectionable they immediately destroyed it after?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      I’m fairly in tune with my privacy but didn’t even know about this one. I assumed I had disabled all this when I setup my phone.

    • @Srh
      link
      English
      14 months ago

      Just used thanks

  • @ATDA
    link
    English
    504 months ago

    Will they finally see or hear me say

    FUCK GREG ABBOTT

    I hope they can, I’m doing it as hard as I can …

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    464 months ago

    Is there anyway we can open source this technology? I’d love to surveil police and politician phones if possible.

  • @TropicalDingdong
    link
    English
    324 months ago

    Weird ass fcking state. Can we pawn this one off to Mexico?

    • JaggedRobotPubes
      link
      English
      -34 months ago

      Jesus just bomb them if you hate them that much.

      • @TropicalDingdong
        link
        English
        64 months ago

        Yeah thats true. I love Mexico. I shouldn’t wish a fate like sending Texans upon them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    254 months ago

    Make sure to support the government in the next elections so they can spend more public money on “security”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 months ago

      And they’ll “catch” just enough “criminals” (read: non-white people) to give Fox News some metrics they can blow out of proportion for the gullible, rural rubes.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    244 months ago

    nobody has ever said “remember that good thing that came out of texas”.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      English
      94 months ago

      If it’s not food, then yeah, we’re setting all the wrong precedents.

      • BeardedBlaze
        link
        English
        84 months ago

        Y’all aren’t exactly known for great food either lol

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          144 months ago

          As a Texan who has no pride in their state at all and is actively making plans to move to a different state, I strongly disagree.

          • @gAlienLifeformOP
            link
            English
            74 months ago

            Yeah, I’m not a Texan but I also disagree about this. Also, Austin has produced some amazing music over the years (for example, random Austin band I’ve been in love with recently is Being Dead).

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              44 months ago

              It’s a shame the politicians suck so hard, because they could make a killing on tourism if they’d get out of their own way.

          • BeardedBlaze
            link
            English
            -24 months ago

            Name food or foods that originated in Texas that are worth even a mention.

            • Angry_Autist (he/him)
              link
              English
              0
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              WHO THE FUCK CARES THE COPS HAVE A LEGAL DEVICE TRACKER CAN WE PLEASE STOP MEMEING AND FOCUS FOR ONE FUCKDAMN MINUTE?!

              • BeardedBlaze
                link
                English
                14 months ago

                What would you like non-Texans like myself to do to help?

          • BeardedBlaze
            link
            English
            -14 months ago

            BBQ didn’t originate in Texas, my dude.

            • @HeyThisIsntTheYMCA
              link
              English
              14 months ago

              Never claimed it did. I just said they do decent ribs. Pretty much everywhere has a regional BBQ style.

  • @doodledup
    link
    English
    194 months ago

    Isn’t the US already a surveillance country?

    • @BassTurd
      link
      English
      64 months ago

      Not to this extent.

    • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
      link
      English
      34 months ago

      It is, but mostly at the Federal level and depending on who’s in the Whitehouse they’re not apt to share that data with the states.

      • @BrianTheeBiscuiteer
        link
        English
        84 months ago

        In my phone it said “Advertising ID”. Just deleted mine. Really annoyed this was on by default. Are Linux phones a thing yet? I’m tempted to get the most basic bitch phone for work (they’ll never support a rooted phone or things like that) and a different personal phone that I have TOTAL control over.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          Im planning on getting a pixel phone next time I switch and will install grapheneos on it. Fuck safetynet compatibility. I’m tired of all the bullshit I have to endure on my Samsung phone.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            04 months ago

            I prefer the GNOME-Mobile DE on phone 😃 but I think goid hardware (like, not 2015 specs) is more the problem than good software right now

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          34 months ago

          Get a Pixel phone and flash GrapheneOS onto it. Best out-of-box privacy and security experience that currently exists still with great usability IMO. Does not have an advertising ID or even Google Play services by default. Also, it actually has better battery life in my experience.