• @assassinatedbyCIA
      link
      English
      1042 months ago

      That the Sumerian’s will use anything but metric.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        English
        342 months ago

        Apparently, muricans are a lost tribe of Sumerians.

        Hold on a sec. I need to write up some golden tablets or something.

        • @mkwt
          link
          English
          202 months ago

          Well you see, in 1793, 'Merica requested the metric artifacts from France so we could be metric too. France sent over a kilogram, but the shipment was lost at sea. And that was a little sad.

          All joking aside, US feet, inches, pounds, and so on have been secretly really metric since 1893.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            English
            9
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            eh.

            Fun fact. if you use your knucklebones to count instead of fingers, and you use multiplication instead of addition you can get to 144 counting on your fingers. (i.e. one digit on the second hand is equal to a full hand- 12- on the first.)

            yeah. some bullshit about that being why we have 12 hours, and 12 inches in a foot, is totally going into those golden tablets.

            (IIRC, we have 12 hours because there was 10 hours of daylight in Egypt, and an hour on either end for twilight. that evolved into the 24 hour system we have today.)

            I think I’ll call my new religion Bullcrap Bulk’rap bulq’rap.

            • Sonotsugipaa
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              You can count up to 1023 without knucklebones if you use a positional representation.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            82 months ago

            Sumerians also tried to metrify, but the copper weights they bought mysteriously corroded

    • kamiheku
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 months ago

      It’s a screenshot of a Twitter post, that’s a meme right?

      • Tlaloc_Temporal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Well if we want to get pedantic, every unique thing passed around and spread is a meme. Jokes, art styles, idioms, words, greetings, most social behavior really. And you can go a step further and say diseases, species, even all of life is a meme.

        And if there ever was a place to use this definition of meme it would be… LinguisticMemes, but this is a good second place.

        • kamiheku
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          Well if we want to get pedantic

          Let’s! You are absolutely right, of course.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    41
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    If I remember correctly, Homo sapiens sapiens was not only coetaneous with Mammoths, but we are widely considered to be one, if not the main cause of their extintion.

    Also constructions like Gobekli tepe, with it’s carvings and decorations, predate the extintion of Mammoths by something like 6000 years.

    • @shalafi
      link
      English
      122 months ago

      Well, that’s a new word on me. Thought spell check corrected contemporary.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 months ago

      I… am so disappointed this didn’t go where, for a split second, my brain thought it was going.

      Homo sapiens sapiens was not only coetaneous with Mammoths, but we are widely considered to be one

      Chickens are dinosaurs - and humans are mammoths!!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        birds are the continuation of the theropod dinosaur lineage.

        humans are the continuation of the early synapsid lineage also present at the time (which later gave rise to the early mammal progenitor).

        when people say birds are dinosaurs they mean the lineage didn’t branch as much as it did for humans, which I think is more survivorship bias than anything.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          People say birds are dinosaurs because every living thing is in every clade of it’s ancestors which means they are dinosaurs. They’re also a lot of other things from all of the other clades so they’re not saying that birds are just dinosaurs, but that they are part of Dinosauria and every other clade of their ancestors and so too will all of their descendants be.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Yes, one could say birds have skeletons in the same manner. I guess I’m just trying to understand what the opposing position before was the great revelation birds are dinosaurs was uttered. I’m perpetually confused by this expression.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    342 months ago

    Weren’t there like full blown civilizations at that point? Kinda weird to refer to mammoths as if it were some stone age prehistoric period and be surprised that someone could craft something like this then lol

  • @SanndyTheManndy
    link
    English
    202 months ago

    Just using some tiny mammoth population on an isolated island in Siberia to state “MAMMOTHS WERE STILL ROAMING THE EARTH WHEN BLAH BLAH BLAH” is somewhat disingenuous.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Roaming the earth means roaming all - or at least a very significant portion of - the earth, not some very isolated region. So I would say yes - if some tiny population of mammoths was still alive in some limited area at this time, they were not ‘roaming the earth’.

    • Gloomy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Also pretending that 4000 years ago humans were still hunter gatherers or something (it’s kind of implied in the wording imo). 4000 years ago there were plenty of fairly developed civilisations around.

  • @Etterra
    link
    English
    192 months ago

    That is a locust.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 months ago

    The eyes don’t make sense to me. How did they know to use this pattern? Are there some really big grasshoppers out there?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      No doubt there are insects big enough to be able to see the patterns on the eyes without magnification.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        2 months ago
        1. Exactly this. Just eyesight & time.
        2. Not to mention that some insects even have a bit of contrast between the lenses so it’s easier to understand they are compounded.
        3. And additionally due to individual lenses compounded eyes arent smooth - by reflecting light at different angles you can make the “bumps” obvious.
        4. Also if there is like a water droplet on grasshoppers eyes you can clearly see it’s surface structure. Just like you can see individual pixels on your (high dpi phone?) screen the same way.

        Tho I bet they didn’t study this ones eyes:

        It’s called a fairy wasp (wiki/Megaphragma_mymaripenne) and it’s only the third smallest insect known.

    • Cethin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      62 months ago

      I’m sure they had plenty of experience with bugs in their environment, both alive and dead. I’m sure you can see the eyes pretty well close up.

    • @BigBenis
      link
      English
      52 months ago

      The aliens lent them a magnifying glass