• Nomecks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12311 days ago

    Nothing bad will happen, as long as they spare no expense.

  • TomMasz
    link
    English
    8211 days ago

    The world they lived in is long gone along with the food they ate and the rest of their species. It seems almost cruel to bring them back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      9211 days ago

      Not that long gone—the last relict population on Wrangel Island only died out about 4000 years ago. That’s (barely) within historic time. There are probably islands in the Canadian and Siberian Arctic that could still support them (and have no or few human inhabitants).

      I see two big issues. First of all, not all knowledge among elephants is transmitted genetically, and I expect mammoths were the same. Who will the new ones learn from? They’ll have to redevelop best practices for dealing with their environment from scratch.

      Secondly, global warming. This seems like about the worst possible time to bring back an ice-age-adapted critter. We’d be better off transferring the effort spent on this project into de-extincting the thylacine, a more recent loss which doesn’t have that specific issue.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1311 days ago

          Different group, I think, and not as close to success. The thylacine has a better chance at long-term survival if we do bring it back, though—it isn’t an ice age creature, and it was surviving despite competition from other creatures in a similar niche until humans started aggressively hunting it down.

          • DominusOfMegadeus
            link
            fedilink
            English
            311 days ago

            I think the mammoths have a really good shot actually. Siberia seems like it will be perfect for them

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
      link
      English
      2311 days ago

      It’s not that long gone. There were still mammoths around when the pyramids were built. Plus there’s still huge swaths of tundra and taiga that they could live on, with a lot of the same plants, even if it’s quite a bit warmer.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1111 days ago

        In the grand scheme of things the pyramids were built relatively recently, but I’d still consider it quite long ago

        • @stoly
          link
          English
          511 days ago

          Measured in human life it’s long ago. measured at universal scales, it was nothing.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 days ago

            A good measurement for human timescales is the age difference between a child and their grandfather (~50 years, basically one generation of oral tradition).
            The mammoths died out 80 grandfathers ago.

            • @stoly
              link
              English
              210 days ago

              That’s an interesting unit of measure for sure. I do get what you’re saying–that’s sort of the limit to where some knowledge can reach.

    • @AbouBenAdhem
      link
      English
      11
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Not advocating for restoring the mammoth, but this is a dangerous line of argument.

      With climate change and ongoing mass extinctions, many current species are or will soon be in the same situation that re-introduced mammoths would be—and you could use the same argument to say that trying to preserve them is cruel so we should kill off any current species facing environmental stress.

    • @Paraponera_clavata
      link
      English
      911 days ago

      They were here pretty recently, their food is still here. It was cruel that we extincted them.

    • @stoly
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      Nah. It’s still the same place. They died out within the time frame of completely modern humans.

    • Ænima
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 days ago

      It’s worse when you consider the state of the world and the warming. They’d have about 20 sq\km of land capable of supporting them and they’d have to share it with those psychos, polar bears.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5411 days ago

    I’ve said this a million times before, but if we’re playing gods anyway, can’t we make them dog sized also?

    I would totally get one or maybe two.

  • @vegetaOP
    link
    English
    3811 days ago

    I hope they have put a substantial amount of thought into potential problems that could arise. (Not that it will actually be like JP)

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      610 days ago

      No! They did it! They blew it up!

      And then the apes blew up their society too. How could this happen?

      And then the birds took over and ruined their society.

      And then the cows. And then…I don’t know, is that a slug, maybe?

      Noooo!

    • Sabata
      link
      fedilink
      English
      110 days ago

      Future scientist can’t make that mistake if we get rid of the future faster.

    • @Zron
      link
      English
      2211 days ago

      Obviously for the local petting zoo

      Plus, mammoth burgers

    • @Tudsamfa
      link
      English
      510 days ago

      There are about 2000 wild tiger left, I found this article from 2011 saying that they might be extinct in the wild by 2030.

      So there might be 2000 ecological niches for smilodon to fill in 5 years. We better hurry then.

  • @theDutchBrother
    link
    English
    2111 days ago

    “Your Scientists Were So Preoccupied With Whether Or Not They Could, They Didn’t Stop To Think If They Should”

    • @samus12345
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      “Life, uh, finds a way.”

  • @Raiderkev
    link
    English
    1711 days ago

    I remember reading about this in 5th grade. 25 fucking years ago. I’ll believe it when I see it…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1811 days ago

      just like nuclear fusion, it was 10 years away 10 years ago, it’s 10 years away now and it will be 10 years away 10 years from now

        • @Noodle07
          link
          English
          210 days ago

          You know what AI needs the most long term? Nuclear fusion…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 days ago

          Fun fact: faster computers allowed tokamak reactors to get a net positive power output, because it allowed them to quickly optimize the magnetic containment field.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1411 days ago

    Everything outside of cities should be a nature reserve and we should clone extinct megafauna to put in zoos

  • @Tudsamfa
    link
    English
    13
    edit-2
    10 days ago
    • Step 1: acquire genetic material
    • Step 2: supplement material with closely related extant species <- We are here
    • Step 3: Get an egg cell with your Frankenstein-DNA to survive and divide
    • Step 4: Produce a healthy baby
    • Step 5: Get a small population in a Zoo/Park
    • Step 6: have a permanent wild population in a specific area
    • Step 7: have enough of those areas to declare repopulation a success

    Is fixating on the mammoths here first-world centrism? The article mentions 4 other species that have way better chances. Also, given how far we are from actual wild mammoths, that “it can solve climate change” argument is just wrong the way it’s been presented.

  • @iAvicenna
    link
    English
    1110 days ago

    we have no idea what happens next

    Make a variant with multiple butts

    • @Treczoks
      link
      English
      810 days ago

      Or make is exactly the size on the picture, where the mammoth fits in a petri dish.

  • @Bookmeat
    link
    English
    1010 days ago

    Poachers. Poachers are next.

    • @Noodle07
      link
      English
      510 days ago

      We bringing poachers to extinction?