• @Etterra
    link
    241 minutes ago

    I would have told her that attractiveness can’t make up for a lack of personality, but that Ola guy ain’t wrong either.

  • BigAssFan
    link
    21 hour ago

    Still puzzles me why everybody’s still shopping at Amazon.

      • @chonglibloodsport
        link
        112 minutes ago

        Yeah, especially if you don’t have a car. Going across town to buy one little knick knack can be an all day affair, with 2 public transit fares included.

        This may explain why Amazon is much more popular in North America than Europe: public transit. So if you want to stick it to Jeff, work for better public transit and more walkable cities!

        • Tiefling IRL
          link
          fedilink
          13 minutes ago

          Also a lot of areas in major cities don’t have large general shopping stores, like Target. It becomes an hour long trip and transfer while hauling whatever you’re buying.

  • FlashMobOfOne
    link
    62 hours ago

    By the time Harris or Trump finish out the next presidency you’ll be poorer and he’ll be making $10,000,00 an hour.

  • @foofiepie
    link
    63 hours ago

    $124,111,680,000 if you’re curious (24x365x2024x7000).

    • @Frozengyro
      link
      12 hours ago

      If you can live you life on 42000 I’d be impressed. I assume you mean 4x what you need yearly for a good life, daily? That’s more reasonable, but I think you’d still struggle at 42k a year these days.

  • @DaddleDew
    link
    47
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “BuT hE’s WoRtH tHaT mUcH bEcAuSe Of AlL tHe HaRd WoRk He’S bEeN dOiNg!”

    You tell that to his delivery drivers who can’t even scratch their nose while driving or that 1984-dystopia-esque automated surveillance system he puts in their vehicles flags it as “distracted driving” and punishes them.

    Oh and they don’t even make enough to raise a family.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      51 hour ago

      There is absolutely no amount of hard work that deserves that much money, absolutely none. You could run a marathon every single day for 50 years and I still wouldn’t say you deserved that much money.

    • Nightwatch Admin
      link
      fedilink
      63 hours ago

      They don’t need to make enough money to raise a family… they don’t get enough time off to do so in the first place.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      134 hours ago

      Those fucking people man…

      Tell me again how these CEOs with multi-million golden parachutes were worth that if they’re bailing from a company they failed?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Elon is the prefect example of how little actual work a CEO does.

        • CEO of SpaceX - Elon Musk
        • Chairman and CTO of Twitter - Elon Musk
        • CEO of Telsa - Elon Musk
        • President of Musk Foundation - Elon Musk
        • CEO of xAI - Elon Musk

        What does Elon do all day? Be a piece of a shit on Twitter. If CEO work was so demanding, there would be no way Elon would be the CEO of three different companies, chairman of the Board and CTO of one company, and a president of a “charitable” organization.

        Reporting by The New York Times found that in 2022, the Musk Foundation gave away $230 million less than the minimum required by law to maintain tax-deductible status, and that in 2021 and 2022 over half **the foundation’s funds went to causes connected to Musk, his family, or his businesses. **

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elon_Musk#Musk_Foundation

      • @DaddleDew
        link
        5
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Because them saying they’re “worth” that is just mental gymnastics to make themselves feel better about abusing the position of power to leech as much money from as many people as possible for themselves.

  • @Sanctus
    link
    English
    347 hours ago

    He doesnt make that in actual money tho. Rich people’s value are vibes based egregors summoned through the stock market. So, in a similar vein, if the stock market crashes and never recovers, he loses most of his money. This is why I propose ripping down Wallstreet to starve the machine.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      337 hours ago

      He’d still have a lot of property to his name, a lot of other assets and stuff that aren’t tied to an arbitrary stock market. Even if you crash it, mansions and luxury cars would still be very valuable. He will never not be a billionaire due to that.

      That is, unless you redistribute his wealth. Then yeah, he wouldn’t be filthy rich anymore.

      • @lordnikon
        link
        English
        44 hours ago

        well it’s worse than that becase most of those houses and other assets were bought for the most part from loans taken out at very low interest rates against the stock he has in his company’s and other shares in his portfolio . The stocks on whole give better return than that interest rate. So it’s free money they can spend an they don’t even have to sell their stock and pay taxes on the returns just the dividends at a way lower rate that any working person. the way this is setup it becomes impossible for him to spend money fast enough for him to actually lose more money than he gained.

      • @Sanctus
        link
        English
        86 hours ago

        Very true, but you have to be able to sell those assets to gain from them. If the stock market is erased you can’t sell your yacht to another exploiter because their networth is decimated too and they can no longer borrow off anything but physical assets, and now they also have a massive “income” stream that is now down so borrowing is more risky. We coulda had a bad bitch of a society, instead we let the rich turn us all into Mammon zombies.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        16 hours ago

        And the vast amount of web storage customers

      • @Sanctus
        link
        English
        86 hours ago

        Love both of these, but going after the stock market is how you kick billionaires in the balls. Then you redistribute their assets to serve society instead of society serving their assets.

    • @snekerpimp
      link
      26 hours ago

      You do not talk about project mayhem

    • Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      -66 hours ago

      You don’t want the stock market destroyed. That is how retirements are funded as well.

      You want to restrict ownership of an individual stock. Limit them to 5% or so. Also make every stock have 1 vote, no exceptions.

      • @grue
        link
        English
        106 hours ago

        You don’t want the stock market destroyed. That is how retirements are funded as well.

        Thus illustrating [one of] the ulterior motive[s] behind replacing pensions with 401(k)s.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          -45 hours ago

          Pensions are funded by the stock market as well. Pension funds are some the largest landlords as well.

      • @Sanctus
        link
        English
        66 hours ago

        No, the stock market needs to go. It is the primary vector of mass exploitation and binds us all to these immoral chains. It makes Mr and Mrs Greenbury down the street as complacent in Nestle’s filfthy acts as the CEOs themselves, because everyone is drooling for line go up, nothing else. Wealth chasing is the heroin addiction for Mother Terra, and we will chase this dragon until the world is charred.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          -96 hours ago

          The stock market is how pensions are funded. That means the largest loss of wealth to the middle class.

          • @Sanctus
            link
            English
            7
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Thats great, you can still save pensions. Use the wealth you are redistributing to ensure pensions. The billionaires have enough for all of us to retire. I’m not advocating for instant destruction. I’m advocating for removing it and replacing it with a system that promotes cooperation and resource efficiency instead of one that solely focuses on financial gain.

            • bizarroland
              link
              fedilink
              24 hours ago

              The stock market is one of the reasons why we don’t have pensions anymore. Companies realize that it’s a lot cheaper to pawn off the responsibility of covering your own retirement on the people who work their entire lives for you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Well, those suggestions would destroy the stock market. Nobody would ever register their company on the stock market if it meant giving up 95% of the control.

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          -26 hours ago

          Really which company do you have more than 1 vote per share or have more than 5%? Very few people are given either.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            All non-stock companies which is the majority of all companies. That’s the problem. When a company applies for a stock market registration, it means that they’re selling off control and profit sharing of the company in order to gain investments to expand.

            All companies start with a single or two owners. The transition from owning everything to including others won’t happen if it means giving up to the majority of control, whether that’s 50% or 5/95%. That’s why many companies get stuck on 51%. It only ever comes over 50% when someone dies or makes a mature decision of letting others control “their” company.

  • @Ziglin
    link
    44 hours ago

    If you spent some of that time a little too close to a black hole you might have a chance though! Obviously you just wouldn’t be working hard enough!

    • @UnderpantsWeevil
      link
      English
      13 hours ago

      I would simply invest a small amount of money into all of the fastest growing equities every day for the next 20 years. Alternatively, I’d just get the NSA to pay me $600M/year for access to some servers that cost me around $50M/year to operate.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I would like to think I would be able to catch up with that kind of income, my apparent immortality, and smart investing, compounding over so many centuries. I’m curious what all currencies and cultures I have had to endure and how the exchange rate of my income is worked it and what currency I will be operating under after the US dollar.