We’ve been anticipating it for years,1 and it’s finally happening. Google is finally killing uBlock Origin – with a note on their web store stating that the …

  • MobileDecay
    link
    English
    121 hour ago

    Welcome back to Firefox everyone! At least if you’re as old or older than I. 😁

  • @irotsoma
    link
    English
    218 minutes ago

    Also Firefox mobile has nearly all of the extensions as the desktop version so it’s more similar across all of your devices. Personally, I use LibreWolf on desktop and Mull on mobile, but they’re just tweaked versions of Firefox with some bloat and telemetry removed and preconfigured to be more private.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    187 hours ago

    You can make a windows registry change to have Chrome let you keep using uBlock Origin, with the V2 manifest. It will buy you six more months, basically the enterprise support period.

    There was a handy shortcut created by the Security Now podcast you can use as a one-click file to update the policy. The show notes also give a more detailed breakdown of what’s going on.

    The relevant section in the notes is page 10. The link to the file is page 12. https://www.grc.com/sn/sn-995-notes.pdf

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    106 hours ago

    After i uninstalled chrome some time ago, i noticed it had been slowing down my entire system even when its not on. There is nothing of worth in using it or any other browser derived from it.

  • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
    link
    English
    23
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    You can always keep Chromium installed for the odd site that doesn’t work in Firefox (my daily driver). I do web development and test in every browser and I almost never encounter sites or features that don’t work in FF. The only one I can recall is something in the Azure Portal, probably because Microsoft wants you using Edge.

    Typically, Safari is the laggard and any developer worth their salt would make sure their site works on iPad and iPhone. When a new web standard is released, usually Chromium supports it first but even then, not always. And web developers usually don’t use features that aren’t implemented across the board yet. I know I go to caniuse.com before I use something fresh out the oven.

    • unalivejoy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      74 hours ago

      If a site requires chrome, it doesn’t require me. If I need it for work, I’ll use Edge instead.

  • @julysfire
    link
    4810 hours ago

    Finally made the switch to Firefox just 2 days ago. Great so far.

    • @Num10ck
      link
      English
      2510 hours ago

      be sure to check out the extensions, there’s several that are game changers.

      • 2501
        link
        fedilink
        English
        79 hours ago

        What are some of the game changing extensions?

        • @Couldbealeotard
          link
          English
          31 hour ago

          New tab tools.

          You can even do a trick to make it your home tab

        • @ilinamorato
          link
          English
          247 hours ago

          For me, it was multi-account containers. All Meta properties open in their own independent, sandboxed tabs now. Xwitter opens in a different independent, sandboxed tab. It makes their tracking cookies useless, plus it also lets you be logged into the same service with multiple accounts simultaneously.

        • @karpintero
          link
          English
          05 hours ago

          Vimium. Allows you to use your keyboard to navigate instead of needing to always reach for the mouse.

        • @Num10ck
          link
          English
          -78 hours ago

          probably different for everyone, for me i use Adblocker Ultimate Ublock Origin Enhancer for Youtube DeArrow Stylebot Buster Context play/pause

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      No, HVEC / H.265 codec support so no modern 4K security camera or plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 minutes ago

        Jellyfin

        Use the desktop client or jellyfin-mpv-shim and you’ll get HEVC support and superior image quality.

      • @ShittyBeatlesFCPres
        link
        English
        88 hours ago

        According to caniuse.com, it works now in the Nightly builds and can be enabled in other builds via the media.wmf.hevc.enabled pref in about:config.

        I use Firefox Dev Edition and I think it’s enabled there. But either way, you can enable it on stable.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          16 hours ago

          Night, windows only, and needs to be enabled with about: config… ie it almost has some support maybe. Also doesn’t work via webrtc so it doesn’t actually help me with the viewing the security cam feeds.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 minutes ago

              Core web app compatibility vs … “enhanced” ad blocking. MS teams and some other business tools also don’t support Firefox but work fine in Chrome and Safari.

              It is something the Firefox team needs to work on again. I used Firefox from when it was released until Chrome came out and mopped the floor with it. At the time Firefox became the bloated beast and went through a reset.

              Unfortunately trying to have a firm stance on not implementing HVEC when they no longer had the largest market share was a bad move and they seem to be slowly back tracking on that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        48 hours ago

        plex/jellyfin etc high quality video support

        H265 isn’t the only option there. AV1 is great and fully supported by Jellyfin (and I imagine Plex?)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          08 hours ago

          H.265 is the defecto standard on Security cameras, and I am not going to migrate content to AV1 that is already in H.265.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 hours ago

              Not when you are using an NVR with scrubbing and everything in the web UI. https://frigate.video/

              All in all it would be an inconvenient workaround for something that already works seamlessly across Safari, Edge, Chrome etc.

              • thermal_shock
                link
                English
                11 hour ago

                damn dude, all you do is bitch. maybe get a different camera setup.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  241 minutes ago

                  How is giving a sober and straightforward explanation of why he can’t use Firefox “bitching”? The simple fact is “switch to Firefox” isn’t a solution for everyone in every case. Burying your head in the sand about that benefits nobody.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 hours ago

            Jellyfin can handle the transcoding to AV1 where needed. Albeit that’s a bit less ideal than direct play as you need the hardware to transcode.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3911 hours ago

    I hope Lina Kahn goes after them for this BS. They have a monopoly on the browser market and they’re exploiting that to further their own interests in the advertising industry.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      English
      148 hours ago

      This is a pretty textbook definition of monopoly abuse.

      I can’t see them keeping control of chrome as this goes forward.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      143 hours ago

      This isn’t sufficient. I’ve been running DNS adblocking for a decade, advertisers have wised up to it and can easily sidestep it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      114 hours ago

      To my knowledge, DNS blockers not only miss a ton of ads, they also trigger several false positives.

      A better solution is to switch to something not chromium like Firefox or whatever alternative the next Linux person to read this comment recommends

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -34 hours ago

    I still hope as part of the antitrust ruling, they rip chrome from Google and undo this crap.

    I’ve had good luck with uBlock Lite.

    (Yes I could swap browsers but nah).

    • @yamanii
      link
      English
      93 hours ago

      Just bite the bullet.

  • @Johnmannesca
    link
    English
    48 hours ago

    Doesn’t Vivaldi have built-in blockers?

  • dadarobot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1211 hours ago

    Honest question here, since chromium (vs chrome) is open source, can someone not fork an older version, or remove the new code blocking ublock?

    I mean i assume it cant be done, but i dont know why

    • @4z01235
      link
      English
      3811 hours ago

      It can be done, but then whoever forks that will need to stay on top of keeping that fork up to date with other changes in the original chromium, and that gets harder and harder to do as time goes on and more changes are made to the same or related parts of the codebase.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1710 hours ago

        And you have to know that if anyone actually tried, they would dedicate their infinite resources to making that as difficult as humanly possible.

        • @NotMyOldRedditName
          link
          English
          188 hours ago

          Google: We changed a color

          Fork Developer: they changed a color and it caused 50,000 breaking changes that a diff tool can’t handle automatically wtf.

          Google: sorry wrong color here’s a new one

          Fork developer: another 100,000 breaking changes that a diff can’t handle?!?!

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      411 hours ago

      I don’t know why either. What I do know is that most Chromium browsers that are not Chrome have ad-blocking built into the browser itself using the same strategies as uBo but not reliant on Mv2 or Mv3 because they’re not extensions.