• @NABDad
    link
    English
    187 hours ago

    What’s wrong with Musk’s face? Was he in some kind of accident?

    • @Valmond
      link
      127 hours ago

      With to many “beauty” operations you cannot use your face muscles without things getting weird.

    • kamenLady.
      link
      96 hours ago

      It’s the cheek where he stores his sperm.

      • @pech
        link
        86 hours ago

        *Putin’s sperm.

  • Jagothaciv
    link
    fedilink
    12812 hours ago

    Now we know why he told Tucker if Trump loses he’s going to prison.

    We are in full holy shit Russia is inside the hen house mode.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      127 hours ago

      And yet mentions of things like this are treated as lunacy by certain users.

    • @fluxion
      link
      English
      5011 hours ago

      There’s also the FTC investigation and potential Enron/Theranos-like collapse of Tesla. The election isn’t the only area where Elon is prone too wildly misleading claims, and fortunately the finance sector is regulated a bit better than less essential things like electing the leader of the free world and not letting traitorous criminals topple democracy

      • @Soup
        link
        499 hours ago

        They might actually start making good decisions.

          • @Sweetpeaches69
            link
            108 hours ago

            It would be pretty cool if SpaceX stopped speedrunning turning their surrounding lands into MadMax style polluted wastelands, though.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            16 hours ago

            I wouldn’t go so far as saying they remain unchanged, They probably have the least changes to make though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Elon talks to Putin and Putin is Trumps master. I have a feeling we are being played by Putin.

    • @CitizenKong
      link
      269 hours ago

      The while Western world is being played by Putin. Right wing parties are on the rise in pretty much every Western country and every single one has had suspicious connections to Russia.

    • Optional
      link
      79 hours ago

      librul conspirasee!! nO cOlLuSiOn! Lamestream mediar lies! freeze peaches!

    • @TooPoor
      link
      710 hours ago

      I think you’re onto something here.

  • @AshMan85
    link
    6712 hours ago

    crazy how american media is not reporting on this traitor

    • Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5812 hours ago

      I mean, it says right at the top of the article:

      Source: The Wall Street Journal

      Should it be reported on more? Absolutely. But it’s disingenuous to say American media is not reporting it.

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        2812 hours ago

        I would guess they mean american media in general instead of just one of them.

        The general public didn’t read the WSJ, and being behind a paywall hasn’t increased the number of people who do.

        • @Omodi
          link
          English
          1210 hours ago

          It’s a WSJ exclusive from 9 last night. It’s not surprising there are not a lot of articles about it yet. The media sucks there is no reason to bitch about nothing.

      • Optional
        link
        411 hours ago

        Probably also that it’s been a full two years plus and nobody’s said anything while he’s raking in billions from the US government for sensitive national programs including the Ukranian army’s internet connectivity.

    • @lemmyman
      link
      1612 hours ago

      Is Wall Street Journal not American?

      • Optional
        link
        610 hours ago

        A banana is not a bunch of bananas. Right?

        WSJ is not “American media” by the same token.

          • Optional
            link
            27 hours ago

            Sort of? If its been ongoing for two years and we already know they’re in contact it seems like corporate news is either incompetent because they didn’t think to ask one question (“how often do they talk”) or they’ve been sitting on the story for - reasons.

  • @Rapidcreek
    link
    2712 hours ago

    One thing is, there is a 99% chance that the NSA recorded the conversation

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      911 hours ago

      Probably, but whether they can understand it depends on whether Musk and Putin used decent end-to-end encryption. You’d expect they would, in which case the NSA may effectively have only the metadata.

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        -511 hours ago

        My sweet child…you think the NSA cannot break encryption?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          9
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          I think it’s possible they can’t, depending on the algorithm used and whether they have low-level access to hardware and/or firmware. It’s possible that some of the recommended algorithms were chosen for subtle NSA backdoors, and I’m sure they have a lot of resources to throw at high-value communications, but I’d be surprised if every algorithm in current use, with large enough keys, can be cracked by them. A low-level backdoor in the hardware device itself would be a different matter, and this seems like a more practical approach for the NSA than cracking the encryption directly, particularly where the participants are taking extra care. So I’d say it’s possible but not certain that they can hear/read these conversations.

          • Optional
            link
            310 hours ago

            That does presuppose they don’t have a direct tap on either or both lines somewhere.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              To get around end-to-end encryption the tap would have to be in the phone handset itself or a vulnerability in the code. I wouldn’t rule either out.

          • @Rapidcreek
            link
            -211 hours ago

            I can’t say much, but I do know they have every computing capacity you can imagine, as well as at least one of every piece of HW, even the stuff that’s built in a basement.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              10 hours ago

              Still, as far as is commonly known, mathematically cracking encryption where the algorithm is good and keys are large and unique remains impractical for conventional computers. If they’re secretly way ahead on quantum computing (which seems unlikely), or if they have discovered mathematical vulnerabilities in common algorithms that have not been published, then that’s a different matter. But as far as we know, it must still be difficult for them to attack encryption directly. You suggest you know more than you can say, but if I were them I’d be looking at putting backdoors into phone/computer hardware to get hold of communications before they are E2E encrypted, and/or placing subtle vulnerabilities in open-source code.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          39 hours ago

          If you don’t understand what the government/military technology is capable of, I’m sorry. I had a coworker who worked in and around extremely high level military surveillance years ago. Back then, they had the capability of turning on any cell phone microphone or camera and real time listen in. He wouldnt go beyond that, but did say/ the surveillance satellites in movies have nothing on current (even back then) capabilities. Imagine now

          We are just now learning of Locate X who can pinpoint almost any phone location, tie it to advertising id’s and view its movement history, and build an entire picture of what virtually any person on this planet is doing. That’s just a company, not the government.

          At this point in my life, I view anti tracking, ad block, encryption, alternate OSs etc. as keeping honest people honest. Military/govt. tech has ways around it all.

          • @Rapidcreek
            link
            09 hours ago

            I once enabled some of of those things for a particular customer years ago.

            I always liked the idea of leaving a text at a specific location for a specific phone.

        • @AbidanYre
          link
          English
          310 hours ago

          AES is freely available and if they knew of any weaknesses it probably wouldn’t be approved for use on TS data.

            • @pivot_root
              link
              38 hours ago

              I see the pot is calling the kettle black.

              • @Rapidcreek
                link
                08 hours ago

                But I never claimed to be an expert. Is this the same guy I just blocked?

                • @pivot_root
                  link
                  3
                  edit-2
                  8 hours ago

                  Nah, just a guy that read the entire comment tree.

                  While I agree with you that there’s a very very high likelihood of the conversation being recorded in some form or another and likely through a side channel, I feel that your “my sweet child… do you not think the NSA can break encryption” comment to be both condescending to the person you replied to, and hypocritical to the comment I replied to.

                  Neither you nor I are cryptographers. We can’t attest to the security or lack thereof of published cryptographic algorithms.

              • @Rapidcreek
                link
                -3
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                I worked decades in the phone business. So, I kinda know how it works. Back in the day, we’d call this an invitation to a dick measurement. Not interested

                • @AbidanYre
                  link
                  English
                  19 hours ago

                  That’s very exciting for you I suppose, my dad works at Nintendo. People can claim whatever they want on the Internet. You’ll have to forgive me for not being impressed by your unverifiable bona fides.

    • ShadowRam
      link
      fedilink
      212 hours ago

      What happens if he communicated through Starlink directly?

      • @Rapidcreek
        link
        911 hours ago

        Same. Don’t forget that the US government licenses Starlink. The NSA can touch it.