OK, its just a deer, but the future is clear. These things are going to start kill people left and right.

How many kids is Elon going to kill before we shut him down? Whats the number of children we’re going to allow Elon to murder every year?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71 hour ago

    Tesla’s approach to automotive autonomy is a unique one: Rather than using pesky sensors, which cost money, the company has instead decided to rely only on the output from the car’s cameras. Its computers analyze every pixel, crunch through tons of data, and then apparently decide to just plow into deer and keep on trucking.

    • @Demdaru
      link
      English
      5
      edit-2
      50 minutes ago

      I mean, to be honest…if you are about to hit a deer on the road anyway, speed up. Higher chance the scrawny fucker will get yeeted over you after meeting your car, rather than get juuuuust perfectly booped into air to crash through windshield and into your face.

      Official advice I heard many times. Prolly doesn’t apply if you are going slow.

      Edit: Read further down. This advice is effing outdated, disregard. -_- God I am happy I’ve never had to put it i to test.

  • Nytixus
    link
    fedilink
    227 minutes ago

    I roll my eyes at the dishonest bad faith takes people have in the comments about how people do the same thing behind the wheel. Like that’s going to make autopiloting self-driving cars an exception. Least a person can react, can slow down or do anything that an unthinking, going-by-the-pixels computer can’t do at a whim.

  • bluGill
    link
    fedilink
    162 hours ago

    Driving is full of edge cases. Humans are also bad drivers who get edge cases wrong all the time.

    The real question isn’t is Tesla better/worse in anyone in particular, but overall how does Tesla compare. If a Tesla is better in some situations and worse in others and so overall just as bad as a human I can accept it. Is Tesla is overall worse then they shouldn’t be driving at all (If they can identify those situations they can stop and make a human take over). If a Tesla is overall better then I’ll accept a few edge cases where they are worse.

    Tesla claims overall they are better, but they may not be telling the truth. One would think regulators have data for the above - but they are not talking about it.

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      82 hours ago

      Tesla claims overall they are better, but they may not be telling the truth. One would think regulators have data for the above - but they are not talking about it.

      https://www.reuters.com/business/autos-transportation/nhtsa-opens-probe-into-24-mln-tesla-vehicles-over-full-self-driving-collisions-2024-10-18/

      The agency is asking if other similar FSD crashes have occurred in reduced roadway visibility conditions, and if Tesla has updated or modified the FSD system in a way that may affect it in such conditions.

      It sure seems like they aren’t being very forthcoming with their data between this and being threatened with fines last year for not providing the data. That makes me suspect they still aren’t telling the truth.

      • Billiam
        link
        English
        218 minutes ago

        It sure seems like they aren’t being very forthcoming with their data between this and being threatened with fines last year for not providing the data. That makes me suspect they still aren’t telling the truth.

        I think their silence is very telling, just like their alleged crash test data on Cybertrucks. If your vehicles are that safe, why wouldn’t you be shoving that into every single selling point you have? Why wouldn’t that fact be plastered across every Gigafactory and blaring from every Tesla that drives past on the road? If Tesla’s FSD is that good, and Cybertrucks are that safe, why are they hiding those facts?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    253 minutes ago

    I know a lot of people here are/will be mad at Musk simply for personal political disagreement, but even just putting that aside, I’ve never liked the idea of self-driving cars. There’s just too much that can go wrong too easily, and in a 1-ton piece of metal and glass moving at speeds up to near 100 mph, you need to be able to have the control enough to respond within a few seconds if the unexpected happens, like a deer jumping in the middle of the road. Computers don’t, and may never, have the benefit of contextual awareness to make the right decision as often as a human would in those situations. I’m not going to cheer for the downfall of Musk or Tesla as a whole, but they do severely need to reconsider this idea or else there will be a lot of people hurt and/or killed and a lot of liability on them when it happens. That’s a lot of risk to take on for a smaller auto maker like them, just thinking in business terms.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      744 minutes ago

      I mean we do let humans drive cars and some of them are as dumb as bricks and some are malicious little freaks.

      Not saying we are anywhere FSD and Elon is a clown, but I would support a future with this technology if we ever got there. The issue is we would have to be all or nothing. Like you can’t have a mix of robots and people driving around.

    • Billiam
      link
      English
      322 minutes ago

      An FSD car that makes perfect decisions would theoretically be safer than a human driver who also makes perfect decisions, if for no other reason than the car could do it faster.

      Personally, I would love to see autonomous cars see widespread use. They don’t have to be perfect, just safer mile-for-mile than human drivers. (Which means that Teslas, with Musk’s gobsmackingly stupid insistence on only using cameras, will never reach that threshold).

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    146 minutes ago

    I thought the deer would be running or something, but no its just straight on from the car, doesn’t move at all! How the fuck does a deer standing dead center in front of you not get caught by the camera!

  • @IsThisAnAI
    link
    English
    1
    edit-2
    59 minutes ago

    You don’t think humans are doing this? Everything I’ve seen is autopilot is safer than humans in the aggregate.

    • @Squizzy
      link
      English
      254 minutes ago

      Are you honestly defending this, the software took a life and didnt react. Im not on a skynet buzz but it is concerningly bad software and implementation.

      I dont care if humans do it, they shouldnt and that should be the easy bar to clear in implementing a replacement for humans.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    11 hour ago

    I wouldn’t be against using teslas to clean up the deer overpopulation problem in the US. I’m in favor of rolling this code into all Tesla models in the next update.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1416 hours ago

    The poster, who pays Tesla CEO Elon Musk for a subscription to the increasingly far-right social media site, claimed that the FSD software “works awesome” and that a deer in the road is an “edge case.” One might argue that edge cases are actually very important parts of any claimed autonomy suite, given how drivers check out when they feel the car is doing the work, but this owner remains “insanely grateful” to Tesla regardless.

    How are these people always such pathetic suckers.

    • teft
      link
      English
      916 hours ago

      I grew up in Maine. Deer in the road isn’t an edge case there. It’s more like a nightly occurrence.

      • snooggums
        link
        English
        315 hours ago

        Same in Kansas. Was in a car that hit one in the 80s and see them often enough that I had to avoid one that was crossing a busy interstste highway last week.

        Deer are the opposite of an edge case in the majority of the US.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Putting these valid points aside we’re also all just taking for granted that the software would have properly identified a human under the same circumstances… This could very easily have been a much more chilling outcome

          • snooggums
            link
            English
            53 hours ago

            I’m not taking that for granted. If it can’t tell a solid object os in the road, I would guess that would be true for a human that is balled up or facing away as well.

        • @Granite
          link
          English
          22 hours ago

          Same, hit one just south of Lyndon at night.

      • TheLowestStone
        link
        English
        43 hours ago

        I drove through rural Arkansas at sundown once. I’ve never seen so many deer in my life.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 hours ago

      Being a run of the mill fascist (rather than those in power) is actually an incredibly submissive position, they just want strong daddies to take care of them and make the bad people go away. It takes courage to be a “snowflake liberal” by comparison

    • @NeoNachtwaechter
      link
      English
      156 hours ago

      Edge cases (NOT features) are the thing that keeps them from reaching higher levels of autonomy. These level differences are like “most circumstances”, “nearly all circumstances”, “really all circumstances”.

      Since Tesla cares so much more about features, they will remain on level 2 for another very long time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      02 hours ago

      Sunk cost? Tech worship?

      I’m so jaded, I question my wife when she says the sun will rise tomorrow so I really don’t get it either.

    • bluGill
      link
      fedilink
      116 hours ago

      Deer on the road is an edge case that humans cannot handle well. In general every option other than hitting the deer is overall worse - which is why most insurance companies won’t increase your rates if you hit a deer and file a claim for repairs.

      The only way to not hit/kill hundreds of deer (thousands? I don’t know the number) every year is to reduce rural speed limits to unreasonably slow speeds. Deer jump out of dark places right in front of cars all the time - the only option to avoid it that might work is either drive in the other lanes (which sometimes means into an oncoming car), or into the ditch (you have no clue what might be there - if you are lucky the car just rolls, but there could be large rocks or strong fence posts and the car stops instantly. Note that this all happens fast, you can’t think you only get to react. Drivers in rural areas are taught to hit the brakes and maintain their lane.

      • @DanglingFury
        link
        English
        22 hours ago

        Damn right. Stomp the brakes and take it to the face.

      • @dhork
        link
        English
        426 hours ago

        Drivers in rural areas are taught to hit the brakes and maintain their lane.

        Which the Tesla didn’t do. It plowed full speed into the deer, which arguably made the collision much much worse than it could have been. I doubt the thing was programmed to maintain speed into a deer. The more likely alternative is that the FSD couldn’t tell there was a deer there in the first place.

        • @SchmidtGenetics
          link
          English
          -17
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Braking dips the hood making it easier for the deer to go into the windshield. You should actually speed up right before hitting to make your hood go up and make it hopefully go under or better stay in the grill.

          • TimeSquirrel
            link
            fedilink
            265 hours ago

            Doesn’t this all depend on the height of your car and the condition of your shocks? Doesn’t seem like a hard and fast rule. Also, you’re assuming rear wheel drive. FWD does not “raise the hood” like you’re playing Cruising USA.

          • troed
            link
            fedilink
            135 hours ago

            Please show me that guideline, anywhere.

            /Swede living in the deer countryside

            • @NABDad
              link
              English
              73 hours ago

              Wear gloves when they hand you that guideline because they might be pulling it out of their ass.

          • @dhork
            link
            English
            16
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Maybe, but it’s still the case that slowing down will impart less energy to the collision. Let up on the brake before impact if you want, but you should have been braking once you first saw the deer in the road.

            Sometimes those fuckers just jump out at you at the last minute. They’re not smart. But if you click the link, this one was right in the middle of the road, with that “Deer in the headlights” look. There was plenty of time to slow down before impact.

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              English
              -15
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Conditions matter and your reaction should always be for the worst possible scenario (moose and snow), braking removes your ability to maneuver as well, and locking the brakes up which will almost always happen when you panic break, would be the worst scenario. If there’s snow or rain, braking again is right out.

              If it jumps out and you can’t do anything but brake, you shouldn’t do that, you grip the wheel and maintain speed, and if you can punch the gas for the hood raise. But people panic and can’t think. So maintain speed, don’t panic and lock your brakes up.

              • bluGill
                link
                fedilink
                22 hours ago

                You should know how to brake without causing maneuver problems (including not locking up the wheels). It is a basic skill needed for many situations. Just keep slowing down, the accelerate just before impact is something that can only be done in movies - any real world attempt will be worse - remember if you keep braking you lose momentum, so the acceleration needs to be perfectly timed or it is worse.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                8
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                I don’t think hitting more gas is going to gently slide the 300 pound buck under my car. It’s just going to increase the impact force.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  33 hours ago

                  Sliding the deer under your car is also really bad for you. It’s going to do a lot of damage under there such as ripping break lines, destroying ball joints, or fragging your differentials. You need to safely shed as much speed as possible while maintaining your lane when about to hit a deer.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  02 hours ago

                  Considering suspension, if you accelerate there’s a lowering of the back of the car/raising of the front.

                  Conversely, breaking has the opposite effect, increasing the chances of the deer rolling over your hood and through your windshield.

                  You’ll want to minimize that, hence the acceleration.

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              English
              -13
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Right before hitting begin the keyword. If you can stop before hitting yes that’s ideal, but in situations where it jumps out and you can’t react. Braking during impact is the worst thing you can do.

              If you think I’m saying to line it up and accelerate for 200meters, I dont know what to say about that,

              • @IchNichtenLichten
                link
                English
                63 hours ago

                Braking during impact is the worst thing you can do.

                This is not correct, where are you getting this from?

            • bluGill
              link
              fedilink
              12 hours ago

              I don’t know, where I live giraffes are only in the zoo and thus never on the road. I’m not aware of any escaping the zoo.

              I’m sure if I lived around wild deere, my training would include that, but since I don’t I was able to save some time by not learning that.

            • @SchmidtGenetics
              link
              English
              -10
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              Same for a moose? Speed up so you clear it before gravity caves your car roof.

              You maintain speed, you can’t maneuver well if braking, and as stated your hood dips while braking too which can cause worse issues.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                149 minutes ago

                The whole premise of ABS brakes, which all cars made in North America since 2012 will have, is specifically to allow you to maintain control when you fully apply the brakes. Unless you are a professional driver or have a car without ABS, you should just fully apply the brakes in an emergency stop. Please stop telling people that fully applying the brakes will reduce manueverability when it won’t for the majority of drivers in the developed world.

                And if someone’s vehicle doesn’t have ABS, they should know how to properly brake without locking their tires, and when it won’t be appropriate to use them.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                4
                edit-2
                2 hours ago

                That’s a good strategy to ensure you die: a mooses torso is already higher than the hood of a lot of SUVs, so you’re taking a moose to the face.

              • @Slowy
                link
                English
                75 hours ago

                No, for moose you are actually supposed to swerve and risk the ditch.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        225 hours ago

        The problem is not that the deer was hit, a human driver may have done so as well. The actual issue is that the car didn’t do anything to avoid hitting it. It didn’t even register that the deer was there and, what’s even worse, that there was an accident. It just continued on as if nothing happened.

        • snooggums
          link
          English
          85 hours ago

          Yeah, the automated system should be better than a human. That is the whole point of collision detection systems!

        • snooggums
          link
          English
          95 hours ago

          If tesla also used radar or other sensing systems instead of limiting themselves to only cameras then being in the dark wouldn’t be an issue.

      • @IchNichtenLichten
        link
        English
        23 hours ago

        Deer on the road is an edge case that humans cannot handle well.

        If I’m driving at dawn or dusk, when they’re moving around in low light I’m extra careful when driving. I’m scanning the treeline, the sides of the road, the median etc because I know there’s a decent chance I’ll see them and I can slow down in case they make a run across the road. So far I’ve seen several hundred deer and I haven’t hit any of them.

        Tesla makes absolutely no provision in this regard.

        This whole FSD thing is a massive failure of oversight, no car should be doing self driving without using cameras and radar and Tesla should be forced to refund the suckers customers who paid for this feature.

        • bluGill
          link
          fedilink
          22 hours ago

          Sure, I do that too. I also have had damage because a deer I didn’t see jumped out of the trees onto the road. (Though as others pointed out this case the deer was on the road with plenty of time to stop (or at least greatly slow down), but the Tesla did nothing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -35 hours ago

        In general every option other than hitting the deer is overall worse

        You’re wrong. The clear solution here is to open suicide-prevention clinics for the depressed deer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    104 hours ago

    It was an illegal deer immigrant, it recognised it, added it to the database on Tesla servers, and mowed it down before it took any jobs or whatever the hate-concern was.

    /s

    … but some actual technically human people do the same when they see an animal, don’t they?
    :(

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      02 hours ago

      … but some actual technically human people do the same when they see an animal, don’t they?

      Not deer…

  • Pasta Dental
    link
    fedilink
    English
    49
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Only keeping the regular cameras was a genius move to hold back their full autonomy plans

    • @cm0002
      link
      English
      205 hours ago

      The day he said that “ReGULAr CAmErAs aRe ALl YoU NeEd” was the day I lost all trust in their implementation. And I’m someone who’s completely ready to turn over all my driving to an autopilot lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        134 minutes ago

        I believe we can make a self-driving car with only optical sensors that performs as well as a human someday. I don’t think today is that day, or that we shouldn’t aim for self-driving to be far better than human drivers.

      • Pasta Dental
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        You can’t understand his ironman levels of genius because of your below-billionnaire mind

  • Diplomjodler
    link
    English
    165 hours ago

    That deer was pushing the woke agenda!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    186 hours ago

    Why does this read like an ad for cybertrucks for people who would want to run over deer

    • Wytch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 hour ago

      What’s Kennedy driving these days?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    34 hours ago

    I hate Tesla as much as the next guy in here.

    But I learned at my driving lessons that you shouldn’t hit the breaks for animals running into your lane, because it can result in a car crash that’s way worse. (think truck behind you with a much longer break length.)

    Don’t know if there’s different rules.

    • snooggums
      link
      English
      52 hours ago

      You learned wrong if you think that is a universal rule for all animals.

      You might have been told that for small animals like squirrels, but that is more about not overreacting. You should absolutely brake for a deer, whether or not you are being tailgated, just like you would brake for any large object on the road.

      Hitting a deer at speed is going to cause far more problems for you AND the people behind you than trying to not hit the deer.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      173 hours ago

      You absolutely need to hit the brakes, but don’t swerve. A deer weighs over 200lbs and will likely crash into your windshield if you hit it head on. You need to safely loose as much speed as you can because even a side hit on the deer is likely to wreck your axel and prevent you from driving.

      • @IphtashuFitz
        link
        English
        53 hours ago

        Exactly. I know somebody who died when a deer came through the windshield…

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, I heard about people dying in crashes with deers also. I just remembered we were taught this, and I just thought it might be programmed to ignore animals because of this.

          But it’s probably wrong, and as someone pointed out, it seems like it didn’t even see the deer.

    • @Windex007
      link
      English
      153 hours ago

      If you watch the video, the deer was standing on a strip of off coloured pavement, and also had about the same length as the dotted line. Not sure how much colour information comes through at night on those cameras.

      The point here isn’t actually “should it have stopped for the deer” , it’s “if the system can’t even see the deer, how could it be expected to distinguish between a deer and a child?”

      The calculus changes incredibly between a deer and a child.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        63 hours ago

        At the same time, it would have located it if it was using radar, but Musk decided that cameras are the future (contrary to all other brands)

        • @Windex007
          link
          English
          33 hours ago

          Yeah. I mean, I understand the premise, I just think it’s flawed. Like, you and I as vehicle operators use two cameras when we drive (our two eyes). It’s hypothetically sufficient in terms of raw data input.

          Where it falls apart is that we also have brains which have evolved in ways we don’t even understand to consume those inputs effectively.

          But most importantly, why aim for parity at all? Why NOT give our cars the tools to “see” better than a human? I want that!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 hours ago

            No human could have avoided that deer without swerving their car.

            A lidar provides superhuman vision which works in the dark and through fog. Elon is making a human car and ignores all the limits we have that can be solved in other ways.

            A human is a general purpose organism. We are not designed as specialized driving machines.

      • @fluxx
        link
        English
        43 hours ago

        Agree, it didn’t do anything to avoid the obstacle. A human could probably see it as an obstacle and try to swerve to the side, albeit not knowing what it is. Not saying it’s possible to avoid, but some reaction would be made.

        • Buelldozer
          link
          fedilink
          English
          124 minutes ago

          A human could probably see it as an obstacle and try to swerve to the side, albeit not knowing what it is.

          Attempting to swerve aside at that speed results in over correction, followed by loss of control and then a rollover crash. Happens all the time to people who aren’t aware / don’t remember that you’re supposed to hit deer head on.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 hours ago

      That’s why humans have brains, for situational awareness.

      And it’s less about not breaking for an animal, as it is about not wildly swerving.

      Also, you should probably revise your thinking on this before you visit any states that have large animals like Moose on the roads. Because if you plow into one with a car, it can easily kill you when it crushes you after impact.

    • @TBi
      link
      English
      -54 hours ago

      Also on motorbikes you are more stable at high speed so better to hit a dog at speed than slow down which could lead to person behind you hitting you or you crashing.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 hours ago

        Absolutely not true. No amount of speed is going to keep you safe if you strike an animal on a bike. You’re better off slowing down so that you have less momentum when you wreck. Drivers should be giving you enough space (even though they rarely do). A deer weighs more than a grown man and will kill you if you hit it at highway speed. A dog will take out your front wheel and cause you to wreck whether you hit it at 15mph or 80mph.

        • @XeroxCool
          link
          English
          53 hours ago

          A deer will shatter your nose fairing and snap handlebars at speed. The next object to catch the deer is your head and torso. No, the burly batwing fairings on a full dresser cruiser are not any stronger than the nose cone on a sport bike when it comes to a 200lb meat bag approaching at 70mph.

          So many myths perpetuated by people who bucked classes and PRACTICE in favor of their uncle’s advice.