I apologize for the many questions.

I’m still baffled by all the mess surrounding the US elections. Before blaming the people, I’m wondering how it is even possible that Trump could be eligible in the first place. How could the administration allow him to be represented after all the felonies, including those where he clearly sold his country by sharing top secret information with Putin? It seems there is evidence that he has been a puppet for decades. I mean, isn’t that the definition of a traitor? What were the secret services doing? Wasn’t the FBI created to combat the very thing Trump is? Where is all the anti-communist sentiment that the US has become accustomed to?

  • Battle Masker
    link
    132 hours ago

    The Supreme Court has the power to say anything against it but 6 of the justices are down bad for it. And at least one of them are being paid specifically NOT to say anything about it

  • @glitchdx
    link
    English
    51 hour ago

    rules don’t matter if no one enforces them. republicans have been consolidating power for decades, partly by never holding their own accountable. dems are always held accountable, but usually for things that either don’t matter or are entirely false.

    Trump isn’t held accountable because his supporters control every institution that can, and they want him to be king of america.

  • Bear
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 hours ago

    We have laws and legal procedures for due process and we presume innocence until proven guilty.

  • @small44
    link
    135 hours ago

    Bush crimes against humanity didn’t prevent him from being eligible to a second term

  • @radix
    link
    English
    648 hours ago

    He is over 35, a natural born citizen, and has lived in the US for 14 years. He was impeached, but not convicted. Accused of insurrection, but the wheels of justice turned too slowly.

    That’s the extent of the legal requirements to be eligible to be President. The theory was that any other social disqualifications would be handled at the ballot box.

    That theory is now proven to be incorrect, but fixing it takes a constitutional amendment.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Out of curiosity, can a judge temporarily strip someone from their election/vote right as part/alternative to a sentence ? It’s a relatively common sentence for French politicians found guilty of corruptions (Which save the cost of keeping them in prison and limit their ability to re-offend) but no idea whether it’s universal or unique

    • oce 🐆
      link
      fedilink
      127 hours ago

      The theory was that any other social disqualifications would be handled at the ballot box.

      That theory is now proven to be incorrect, but fixing it takes a constitutional amendment.

      That could be a slippery slope too. Imagine a constitutional amendment making someone ineligible because of a “social disqualification” such as sexual orientation.

      • Flax
        link
        fedilink
        English
        185 hours ago

        I think Americans need to realise that Trump won by popular vote- anything to prevent this legally would be undemocratic. You’ll need to change social attitudes or maybe put up a better candidate/run a better campaign in opposition.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          74 hours ago

          I think Americans need to realise that Trump won by popular vote

          That mean that most USians are appalling people.

          As a Latin-American suffering for decades the consequences of US foreign policies, I’m not surprised.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            43 hours ago

            Gonna have to second this. We decided that, despite everything, none of it was a dealbreaker.

            It’s definitely tough to accept that 72 million Americans made that choice, and even more than that didn’t even give enough of a shit to turn up to vote.

            It’s disappointing and embarrassing.

        • @hoshikarakitaridia
          link
          8
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          I mean making someone ineligible to be president for as long as he is under investigation for insurrection, treason or other crimes against the United States sounds pretty straightforward.

          He could always wait and get back into it the next cycle if the investigation gets dropped or if he’s proven innocent.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            83 hours ago

            It sounds straightforward until it’s used as a weapon by the sitting administration to prevent competition at the ballot box.

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              23 hours ago

              You know, because every president commits a little light treason here and there! Same as speeding in a car. It’s not that big of deal /s

              • VindictiveJudge
                link
                English
                02 hours ago

                Dude, this isn’t really a hypothetical. We’ve already seen this exact tactic get used in places like Russia. You just bring bullshit charges against whoever opposes you. The veracity of the charges is completely irrelevant.

                • @TrickDacy
                  link
                  12 hours ago

                  This idea rejects the idea that we can put any faith in our courts, even if we add extra measures to make them more trustworthy. If this is true, why bother even faking any of this shit? Let’s just all begin thinking of ourselves as slaves and our leaders as untouchable gods.

  • Flax
    link
    fedilink
    English
    65 hours ago

    I don’t think it’s democratic to ban people with a criminal record from voting or running. If the people want to vote someone like that in, then who’s to stop them

    • babybus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 hour ago

      It also means that your opponent can’t stop you from running by prosecuting you like it happens in countries like Russia.

    • @PunnyName
      link
      114 hours ago

      The fact that Jan 6 wasn’t the tipping point still boggles the mind.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    English
    318 hours ago

    he hasn’t been charged/convicted of any of the relevant felonies that would preclude service, and nobody is going to make an issue of it; simply because all three branches of government are now under christofascist control. any lawsuits will go to SCROTUS, where they’ll just rubber stamp a decision and cite some bullshit.

    also the 14th gives enforcement to congress, which won’t do anything either.

    • @TrickDacy
      link
      23 hours ago

      The question I have is why are felony convictions not considered a disqualification for president but they disqualify everyone else from literally almost any job? I knew someone who got a conviction and was hired by chik fil a then later told whoops we missed that on your application sorry can’t hire you.

      • VindictiveJudge
        link
        English
        12 hours ago

        So you can’t weaponize the courts against your political opponents.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          12 hours ago

          I do not buy this one bit. I accept that it’s given as a rationale but the only result of it is leaders being above the law and being held to a lower standard than anyone else.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 hour ago

            How does it result in that?

            Being eligible to run for president is not a factor in someone being perused for justice.

            • @TrickDacy
              link
              11 hour ago

              … did you read the comments above? We’re discussing whether or not we should prevent criminals from running for office. When the answer is “no”, that allows criminals to get into office. I cannot get a job at Piggly fucking Wiggly if I am a felon.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                149 minutes ago

                Yes, I did read the comments.

                Aside from perhaps a couple fringe exceptions, there is noting enshrined in law that prevents a felon from getting a job. A company may decide to not hire someone because they are a felon, that is their choosing and not a result of a law.

                An individuals eligibility for running for president does not impact whether or not justice, as defined by our laws, is perused against them.

                If I’m understanding correctly you think that criminals should not be eligible. It appeared that you were arguing that in our current system folks are able to be above the law because they are eligible to run from president. I was asking how someone’s eligibility causes them to be above the law.

                I know things are very emotional now and that totally makes sense and perhaps is leading to the hostility of your comments. With that in mind I feel I have presented what I’ve set out to and will not reply to your further.

                • @TrickDacy
                  link
                  1
                  edit-2
                  44 minutes ago

                  enshrined in law

                  Ah yes, the only thing that matters. Hey guys I can’t afford groceries so I’ll go back to robbing people – it’s okay though, not enshrined in law! I’ll just flash my “felon: I can’t get a job anywhere” card at the cops and they’ll be on their way!

                  My obvious point that I clearly stated was that if ordinary citizens cannot even support themselves after being convicted (often wrongly btw), then why do politicians get away with it scot fucking free?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        13 hours ago

        Right? If the democrats wanted trump out they could have killed him.

        Presidents have immunity now.

    • Llamatron
      link
      13
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      But why? Why are all these people so happy to protect such a despicable human being who will happily throw any of them under the bus and who has, and will again, sell out their country to anyone who says nice stuff to him and gives him money? It’s absolutely extraordinary.

      And it’s not like it’s a secret. His corruption is there out in the open for all to see. We all see it, we all know it. And yet here we are.

      My mental wellbeing has taken a major hit this last day seeing how so many people would rather burn down our future than vote for a competent black woman.

      • @halcyoncmdr
        link
        English
        137 hours ago

        They have been setting the pieces to this eventuality for 60+ years.

        Trump just stumbled onto the very carefully set board, and started messing with it, and exposing the plans in the process. Being the narcissist he is, he is incapable of not using anything he wants, so it forced the Republican establishment’s hand. They had to bring him into since the Presidency is necessary to further the plan, and in turn he also became dangerous since he’s 100% the type of person to use that information to extort the outcome that helps him. I don’t think they really understood how bad an idea that was at the times and now they’re stuck.

      • mortimer
        link
        English
        -177 hours ago

        She wasn’t competent. That was the problem. It was going to be much of the same shit under Harris as it was under Biden. Both parties are two sides of the same coin controlled mainly by Zionist lobbyists. It’s an illusion of democracy. The US is fucked. Now it’ll be fucked faster. If I was a US citizen I don’t know how I would’ve voted. In all conscience I couldn’t vote for Harris because of her continued support of genocide in Gaza, but equally there’s no way Trump would get my vote either (because he’s an egotistical lunatic). I guess I’d go for a third party which is marginally a better option than not voting at all.

        • @TrickDacy
          link
          2
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Everyone who thinks bOtH sIdEs can stop talking now. You’ve shown how precisely reality-divorced your toxic mentality has been all along. We know you want to spread lies because it makes you happy. But no one wants to hear it. Ever.

          Edit: whoever responded below, know that I’m basking in the glow of not seeing your comments because I blocked your toxicity ❤️

        • @kvasir476
          link
          46 hours ago

          “And they hated mortimer because he told the truth”

          Harris was a mediocre candidate who ran a dogshit campaign. If the democrats are smart anyone involved in the decision making levels of the campaign should be blacklisted from ever working with the party again.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            23 hours ago

            They hated Mortimer because his fucked up attitude just destroyed what was left of society. This will spread around the world. Nothing will remain. All because people are too simple minded to understand that flawed people are better than evil people

          • mortimer
            link
            English
            26 hours ago

            Damned right. It would’ve been hard to out-dogshit her.

            • @PunnyName
              link
              84 hours ago

              Fuckface 45 was sitting right there doing exactly that. Yet fascists voted him in.

              • @TrickDacy
                link
                43 hours ago

                Fascists and fake moral warriors who stayed at home or voted for known Russian asset Jill Stein.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    27 hours ago

    Eugene Debs ran for president while in federal prison for sedition, so it’s not really unprecedented.

    • Flax
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Bobby Sands became a British MP from prison