• The fediverse will have the same growths as most foss. It will start slow and continue to grow slowly forever. It will always be a bit behind the cutting edge but it will never get worse only get better. Its like evolution it gets forked the best fork wins the reat die repeat.

    Every enshitification cycle we will gain a few people and once we have them we have they stay a lot longer than most other platforms. We will not win through mass adoption but through a long slow a painfull proccess of gradual accumulation.

    And at some point it will become dominant eg blender, a bunch of standards, and linux in the server space. The tech companies live on the edge forever trying to outrun the snail that will kill them instantly when it touches them. Foss is coming it cannot be stopped it will find them and it will kill them

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 hours ago

    I love the Fediverse and see it as the only reasonable choice. Everywhere else you must eat shit and like it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    164 hours ago

    The fediverse needs to outlast BlueSky, so that when its VC backers call time and demand a profitable exit (i.e. enshittification), there’ll still be a fediverse.

  • Rentlar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    48
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Even if Mastodon and other Fediverse platform gains are 1% of the gains of BlueSky or anything else, it’s still cause for celebration and to welcome new friendly faces with open arms.

    When the Reddit API-calypse happened, I don’t think anyone expected Lemmy to have more users than Reddit or anywhere even close to a similar number. But Lemmy.ca went from around 40 active users in April 2023 to hundreds, and then to 2k over 3 months, most people being friendly and ready for something different.

    Quantity isn’t everything. There is an innumerable amount of things that could be better about Mastodon, Lemmy and other Fediverse software and sure, mass-adoption could help with niche content. However the way the Fediverse is set up, it is resistant to all the sacrifices other platforms had to make in the long run to be more profitable. Musk-boi could “buy” Mastodon, Spez could “buy” Lemmy.world and ml, and Zucker-bot could “buy” Pixelfed tomorrow, but that wouldn’t stop anyone from forking those platforms and leaving the main instances. The distributed nature makes it hard for a monopolist to capture.

    • Jupiter Rowland
      link
      fedilink
      English
      105 hours ago

      Musk-boi could “buy” Mastodon, Spez could buy Lemmy.world and ml, and Zucker-bot could “buy” Pixelfed tomorrow, but that wouldn’t stop anyone from forking those platforms and leaving the main instances.

      Or going someplace in the Fediverse that’s neither Mastodon nor Lemmy nor Pixelfed.

  • metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    718 hours ago

    "…and does not depend on venture capital to survive,” wrote Rochko, subtly jabbing at one of Bluesky’s potential weaknesses with that last bit.

    it wasn’t a subtle jab, it’s the primary reason everything else has gone to shit. it is the MAIN selling point of the fediverse.

    • atro_city
      link
      fedilink
      117 hours ago

      Bluesky plans to generate revenue via subscriptions at some later point and by providing other paid services, like access to custom domains.

      This looks like a very important point. I doubt we’ll see true federation with “access to custom domains”.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 hours ago

        Its so blatantly obvious that bluesky is already looking for ways to make profit. The enshittification cycles are getting shorter and shorter. Soon they will try to travel back in time to create even more shit.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 hours ago

          From what I can gather, they aren’t selling the ability to link custom domains as your user handle. They are acting as a domain registrar to allow users to buy domains and link them to their handle in one step, then likely skimming some profits off the top. Imagine they sell a “custom username with domain” for $20 per year, they pay the wholesale fee (around $9 for a .com) and pocket the rest. That seems perfectly reasonable to me.

    • ᥫ᭡ 𐑖ミꪜᴵ𝔦 ᥫ᭡
      link
      fedilink
      English
      67 hours ago

      it is the MAIN selling point of the fediverse.

      Debatable, I would say it’s the ability to selfhost and not be under the mercy of “the platform” or the admin’s subjective morals, you can also not federate and make the place your own

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        57 hours ago

        do you think any of that could happen if it was beholden to capital?

        • ᥫ᭡ 𐑖ミꪜᴵ𝔦 ᥫ᭡
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Not necessarily, it all depends on the software license, people don’t usually care about who funds their software, ( even if they’re funding it themselves with their data ), plus If we’re talking about selling points, saying that you can control your online presence is a much successful sell than saying it’s not VC funded, like I never used that argument when I try to convince my friends to hop on Mastodon

          Edit: but I’m not saying it’s not a valid argument, it’s very valid

    • @Lost_My_Mind
      link
      English
      27 hours ago

      I wouldn’t say it’s the main selling point. Because if it is, there is no selling point.

      The fediverse is a series of social networks. Social networks rely on being SOCIAL. So in order to have a healthy social network you need a large number of people. The more people, the better the platform. It’s that easy.

      The current audience for Lemmy/Fediverse is a niche group. This group highly prefers linux. It cares (and knows about) federation. It cares about adblocking. It highly prefers political discussions. It cares about privacy.

      As for the majority of the country? They don’t give a shit. About any of that. At all.

      Linux is a platform that if you based user numbers on features, it SHOULD be the number one operating system. It’s not. It’s not even close. I’ll put it this way. The Dallas Cowboys play in a stadium that can fill 100,000 people. If you filled a sellout crowd for an event, the ticketing ushers would outnumber the linux users in that building.

      And the reason for this, is the average American does not give one shit if something has enshitification. Or even notice enshitification. That’s the reason products keep shrinkings, ads keep appearing. If people stopped using the products, they would stop doing that. It’s only profitable because people don’t care.

      So if the major selling point is “we don’t have corporate enshitification”, and the majority of people don’t even know what that means, then it’s not a selling point is it?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        140 minutes ago

        The more people, the better the platform. It’s that easy.

        Hard disagree, quality matters as much or perhaps more than quantity. A billion Nazi network is still Nazi, see Xitter for instance.

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        16 hours ago

        The current audience for Lemmy/Fediverse is a niche group.

        A niche group who is here because capital destroyed other platforms we loved.

        I don’t think my statement is untrue but I also don’t think it will remain true for much longer for exactly the reasons you put forward.

        edit: @[email protected]

  • @Today
    link
    English
    126 hours ago

    I thought the name x was stupid, but now I love the idea of eXodus. If I were starting a site, that’s what I would call it.

    • @someguy3
      link
      English
      84 hours ago

      X is full of white supremacists.

      • @TrickDacy
        link
        English
        34 hours ago

        Has been for over a decade

        • @someguy3
          link
          English
          64 hours ago

          Maybe I should say it’s reached a real tipping point.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Yeah, that makes sense

    • @Zombiepirate
      link
      English
      66 hours ago

      From Wikipedia:

      In November 2024, following Donald Trump’s victory in the 2024 United States presidential election and Elon Musk’s nomination as a co-executive of the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, Bluesky experienced a surge in new user registrations as people migrated from other social platforms, particularly Twitter. Many came from the United States, United Kingdom (where Bluesky had previously seen growth during the 2024 UK riots following Musk’s commentary), and Canada. The social app added over 4 million registered users in that week, becoming the most popular app in the US App Store and Play Store.

  • @savant
    link
    English
    47 hours ago

    I think I saw two or three “exodus from Twitter”, every time most of the users go back after two weeks or so.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      177 hours ago

      Most definitely go back, but some stay, and those who do stay, cause a growth over time. The activity stays somewhat elevated and never goes back to exactly where it was. It’s always just a little bit higher.

      • @Lost_My_Mind
        link
        English
        47 hours ago

        Kind of like Elvis’s colon. He expelled MOST of the fecies everyday, but some stayed permanently, until he died on the toilet with 25lbs of fecies inside him that never came out.

        I guess in this example, I’m saying that people are shit