Does it feel like your X account belongs to you and you can do whatever you want with it? That’s not true, according to a new court filing from the social media company formerly known as Twitter. It’s an argument that X is making in order to throw a wrench in The Onion’s recent purchase of InfoWars, the conspiracy theory media company run by Alex Jones. And it’s a great reminder that you don’t actually own what you think you own in the digital age.

  • Cornpop
    link
    English
    227 minutes ago

    He does though. Read the fine print. You are just allowed to use it. Not really surprising.

    • @AndrewZabar
      link
      English
      115 minutes ago

      You mean rich spoiled man-children who are nothing more than insecure adolescent tweens going through puberty and having sexually frustrated tantrums because girls just laugh at them, and their narcissism is so all-consuming that their only emotion is disdain and goal in all the world is more and more self-gratification and the insatiable pursuit of total control of everything, because they know deep down they will never ever be the recipients of genuine respect or admiration.

      Yeah that’s what I thought you said. Slight faux pas.

  • Dragon Rider (drag)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    275 hours ago

    The Onion should allow Musk to block the sale of the Twitter handle, then sue Alex Jones for falsely advertising the sale of an account he can’t sell and sue Twitter for infringing on their trademark of the InfoWars brand.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9215 hours ago

    So if X-itter accounts were to threaten persons or places that were in the interest of the state to protect that responsibility lies on Musk?

    • @Blue_Morpho
      link
      English
      7915 hours ago

      Gee wizz, I don’t think you understand Capitalism at all. Musk gets the profits and you get the liability.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1714 hours ago

        If only he were also trying to sue advertisers that no longer want to do business with him. It would be the perfect storm of what is good comes to me and what is bad is yours.

  • @the_tab_key
    link
    English
    911 hours ago

    I hadn’t logged into Twitter in years. Just signed in to delete my account. He can have it back.

    • @DarkSpectrum
      link
      English
      24 hours ago

      You think it’s really deleted in the back end? Adorable

      • @the_tab_key
        link
        English
        12 hours ago

        No, I don’t. But that’s another data point for them to see people leaving their service.

    • @ZigZagZebra
      link
      English
      310 hours ago

      same, deleted an inactive account.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    916 hours ago

    I mean, if someone lets me into their house, points me to a whiteboard with a pen and tells me to write whatever I want so the other people in the house can read it…
    Do I own the whiteboard? Or the pen? Or have control over any of it?

    No. The owner of the house can lock me out and wipe off or change what I wrote at their leisure.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      53 hours ago

      A better analogy is i hand you a bullhorn and you shout at randos.

      Do i own your words, even though it’s my bullhorn? No.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Depends, actually.
        If you lend it to me privately, no. If you hand it to me on a stage, kinda yes.

    • @Hawke
      link
      English
      3015 hours ago

      You do have some control, in the form of copyright. Also the analogy doesn’t hold up well since you’re not using their “pen” and they only let you reach inside through the window. And the audience is outside the house.

      • @Blue_Morpho
        link
        English
        1315 hours ago

        And to continue that analogy- Twitter didn’t assign the name, the user created it so they hold copyright on the name.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1014 hours ago

        Except when you enter the home, you accepted the TOS that transfers copyright to the owner of the home.

        • @Hawke
          link
          English
          1914 hours ago

          Nope.

          as a user, “you retain your rights to any Content you submit, post or display on or through the Services. What’s yours is yours you own your Content (and your photos and videos are part of the Content),” although you also grant Twitter a license to use the content, which authorizes it “to make your Content available to the rest of the world and to let others do the same.” Based on this language, other twitter users are also licensed to copy and redistribute your posts by “retweeting” them.

          https://copyrightalliance.org/faqs/tweets-protected-copyright/

          • @JeremyHuntQW12
            link
            English
            -38 hours ago

            Really ? I think you’ll find that clause means you do not own copyright to anything you post on X.

            • @FooBarrington
              link
              English
              12 hours ago

              Really? How do you get that from “you retain your rights and give Twitter a license to use your content”? Retaining rights literally means not giving them up.

            • @trolololol
              link
              English
              33 hours ago

              Find some pedos posting bad stuff and they’ll backtrack real fast

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1014 hours ago

            Congratulations on reading the twitter TOS. Now tell me if it is legal for a company to lay claim on copyright via a TOS.

            • @Hawke
              link
              English
              1414 hours ago

              We were talking about twitter. Stay with the program please.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -1014 hours ago

                I thought we were talking about who legally can lay claim on copyrights in the hypothetically house with a whiteboard? i’m not the one lost with the program.

                • @trolololol
                  link
                  English
                  13 hours ago

                  You see, x is the pen, Infowars is the ink and we’re the contents of the water bowl all along

                  Skibidi dibidi bop

  • @Itdidnttrickledown
    link
    English
    916 hours ago

    Not mine you faker. I never signed up for any of your crap.

  • @hightrix
    link
    English
    515 hours ago

    He does. Same with any other platform you do not “own” your account. You have credentials to login to an account you created.

    This should not be news to anyone. This applies to all social media, all entertainment, and every other account you use online.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      611 hours ago

      Which is why it’s really important to have some trust /reputation if using these services.

      Why anyone would use a service run by a fascist entitled madman who literally represents the very worst version of humanity is beyond me and they deserve whatever they get.

    • bizarroland
      link
      fedilink
      612 hours ago

      I don’t know why you’re getting downvoted, you are correct.

      The platform owns the platform.

      You have given the platform permission to use anything on the platform however they want.

      They own the content you put on the platform.

      • @pivot_root
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        They own the content you put on the platform.

        This will depend on the terms of service agreement. Some of them try to get away with this, while others just give themselves an irrevocable license to use content you publish on their platform.