President Biden’s hypocrisy on full display: Pardons his own son after making a point about ‘independent’ justice"

In a move that’s being hailed as a “full and unconditional” pardon, President Joe Biden has announced that he’s granting his son Hunter Biden a free pass for all federal charges related to his time between 2014-2024. Just 50 days before leaving office, Biden had previously declared that he wouldn’t be making the move, stating he’d abide by the jury’s decision. But now, it seems he was just playing a different tune.

TL;DR

President Biden pardoned his son Hunter Biden, who was facing up to 25 years in prison for lying on a federal form about his drug addiction. This comes after months of saying he wouldn’t make the move, and is being met with criticism from politicians and others who called him out on his earlier stance. A case of “my family is more important than I am” - how about keeping your promises for once?

  • @banshee
    link
    53 hours ago

    I read over Biden’s statement, and it makes sense to me. Hunter was singled out for political purposes. It would seem weird if Biden didn’t issue the pardon.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    45 hours ago

    Despite what Biden may try and spin this as, this is not just about the (aggressively politicized and pursued) 4473 ‘unlawful user’ perjury charge - otherwise why include the years prior to that act?

    President Joe Biden’s son is charged with lying about his drug use in October 2018 on a form to buy a gun that he kept for about 11 days in Delaware

    Because Biden pardoned him from 2014 to present, it also includes the known tax evasion and FARA illicit lobbying concerns.

    The Justice Department on Tuesday [June 18th 2023] said the investigation into Hunter Biden was “ongoing” even as it announced terms of a plea agreement [for gun and tax charges]

    DoJ felt that there was more to investigate even if the tax and gun charges were covered in a plea deal. Read: there’s something there regarding Hunter’s lobbying efforts - and from internal Burisma emails he knew about the law and FARA concerns.

    In the same April 2014 email, Hunter Biden indicated that Burisma’s officials “need to know in no uncertain terms that we will not and cannot intervene directly with domestic policymakers, and that we need to abide by FARA and any other U.S. laws in the strictest sense across the board.”

    Biden is right that most 4473 charges would never get this far - what he’s cynically not pointing out (from the bully pulpit, lame duck or not) is the context of why prosecutors drop gun charges in plea deals or pursue maximal charges at trial, or the wider criminal case against his son.

    • @chaogomu
      link
      84 hours ago

      The simple truth is, the entire case against Hunter Biden was politically motivated from the start.

      He paid the back taxes and the gun charges are normally laughed out of court.

      This was always a Republican prosecutor wanting to make a name for themselves, and with Trump taking power, well, we all know how vindictive Trump is.

      I don’t expect this pardon to matter much, Trump and the Republicans don’t care about law or tradition or reality. They care about power, and are less than 2 months away from it.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        You’re missing my point, Biden did not give his failson a targeted pardon nor a blanket universal pardon for his whole lifetime. The gun charge stems from a crime in 2018. The tax charge is from as early as 2015. The illegal lobbying/FARA investigation stretches to at least 2014. Witch hunt investigation or not, it was sustained into federal charges and was going to trial, out of a California and Delaware court - not Texas or Alabama.

        If this pardon is just about the gun charge, as Biden alleges, why extend it back beyond 2018 and into 2014 when the alleged FARA/lobbying crimes were committed? Or if he’s so concerned about his son’s future unjust prosecution under a Trump DoJ, why is Biden blithely consenting to handing over power to Trump after the Supreme Court gave him near unlimited executive power?

  • @Goodmorningsunshine
    link
    66 hours ago

    Sure wish anyfuckingbody with power cared about helping THE ACTUAL COUNTRY WHILE THERE’S STILL TIME

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    46 hours ago

    So glad Biden is so concerned about following the law that protecting vulnerable people with his newly granted immunity is something he would never consider doing.

  • @Dragomus
    link
    22
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Biden knows they will come after himself but he’s too old so they will slam the hammer on his son with the maximum force they can get out of it, this is a good way to thwart that political attack.

    Also, someone should remind Trump that he handled firearms after he was convicted of a felony and was not prosecuted for that …

    Though I don’t think the importance of that fact will dawn on Trump, he never felt rules applied to him.

    • @psycho_driver
      link
      910 hours ago

      Old rich guy who has never had to face consequences for any action coming to a realization? Sure.

  • SkavarSharraddas
    link
    fedilink
    1410 hours ago

    Nice. Hopefully Biden keeps doing more good shit in his remaining few weeks while the MAGAt snowflakes are triggered and distracted by Hunter’s dick again.

  • @MaxPow3r11
    link
    48 hours ago

    It would have been nice if he could have used his presidential powers

    to prevent the genocide…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 hours ago

      Or to change that stupid ATF form 4473 which basically requires anyone who smokes weed to either commit a felony by lying (checking the box for they don’t use illegal drugs) or tell the truth (checking the box that they do) and being unable to purchase a firearm. Unfortunately the war on law abiding gun owners had to continue so on a few occasions their position continued to be that marijuana users should not be allowed to buy or own firearms.

      Hypocrisy+++++

      • SSTF
        link
        2
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        That question is required by HR 1025 (“The Brady Act”). To get rid of weed as a factor, there would either need to be a change to the form requirement, or weed to be made federally legal and thus not an illegal substance. The requirement is not an ATF determination.

        Joe Biden could theoretically pardon all people in violation of this, but I wouldn’t hold my breath for a blanket universal pardon involving guns and weed together.

  • NoiseColor
    link
    10716 hours ago

    Good decision. Trump and his gang promised all kinds of revenge. They don’t play by the rules. So it makes sense to do whatever for your last son.

    • @andros_rex
      link
      15 hours ago

      If we’re going to start abusing presidential power preemptively, can we get some sort of executive protections for trans rights or waiving student loans? Things that’ll help someone other than the addict failson?

      • @Eldritch
        link
        English
        24 hours ago

        Trump would just cancel them all. Day one like he did last time.

        • @andros_rex
          link
          14 hours ago

          Canceling student loans would be hard to undo though. If we’re shutting down the Department of education anyway… who’s keeping track?

    • @phoneymouse
      link
      5115 hours ago

      Agreed. If Hunter Biden’s issues hadn’t been politically weaponized so much, I doubt Biden would have done it, but the truth is, with Trump coming in to office and threatening retaliation, it makes sense to pardon him.

      • @Boddhisatva
        link
        168 hours ago

        The crimes Hunter was charged with are rarely enforced and rarely involve jail time. The Republican’s made this a political circus that would have certainly had Hunter doing time. If it wasn’t for that, Joe would not have needed to pardon him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 hours ago

      I think the issue a lot of us have with this is less that he’s stooping to Trump’s level, and more that he’s only doing it to help his own family. Abusing the office of the president is apparently fine and good if its done on behalf of someone who’s name is Biden, but the rest of the planet can get fucked.

      • @InputZero
        link
        139 hours ago

        Is he though? Isn’t one of the purposes of presidential pardons to protect a person from unjust political persecution. If Republicans weren’t Trump’s party I would agree it’s nepotism, but it is Trump’s party who will be in power. Trump has vowed to seek revenge on his opponents. Joe Biden is too old to really be punished as much as the Republicans want him to be, but Hunter Biden has many years left. MAGA Republicans could punish him for their hate of his father for at least four years, if not the rest of his life. Isn’t that one of the purposes of a presidential pardon?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          13 hours ago

          “Unjust political persecution” - in whose eyes? Trump pardoned a lot of his cronies (for a likely quid-pro-quo) that were involved in J6 - is that a good use of pardon powers?

          A president’s or governor’s pardon is inherently anti-democratic and political. One person gets to decide if the Justice System is allowed to finish it’s work or not, and thus we avoid having to address the why that in/justice was done by the system in the first place. When Biden pardoned non-violent drug offenders, that was a good use of pardon to reincorporate people who had erred and give them a second chance in society - but it did nothing for those who will fall foul of those same laws still on the federal register. The same with every death penalty clemency - we solve the scenario without addressing the issue.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        48 hours ago

        I mostly agree. This is abuse of Presidential power so it is hypocritical for liberals to deny that… But, at the same time, if I were in Biden’s situation I would likely do the same. And here is why:

        1. It is his son. His last son. Of course any loving father will do whatever they can to protect their son.

        2. Why should Democrats care what Republicans think? Democrats are getting curb stomped by fascists who give zero shit about the integrity of our institutions or abuse of political power. They truly don’t. People voted for a pedophile felon traitorous oligarch. If you agree to an honorable sparring match of fisty-cuffs and your opponent pulls out a glock and shoots you in the knees and the crowd cheers for the cheater, do you have any moral or pragmatic reason to keep playing by the rules? No.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        69 hours ago

        I mean… there’s another read on this whole thing, too: “huh, I guess everyone voted for nepotism and insider deals, so why the fuck not, especially in this context?”

        Biden’s just giving the electorate a preview of what they voted for.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      414 hours ago

      Good decision. Trump and his gang promised all kinds of revenge. They don’t play by the rules. So it makes sense to do whatever for your last son.

      I would hope those that oppose Trump do not just adopt all his behaviors.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness
        link
        fedilink
        3513 hours ago

        I mean I fucking hate Biden’s guts but it literally makes no sense to leave his son at the victim of Trump. Whatever Hunter was getting was never going to be justice either way.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          45 hours ago

          Didn’t the Justice Department originally decide not to pursue charges until Republicans threw a fit? Seems like it was already a politically motivated prosecution, so I have no issues with a political pardon.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          910 hours ago

          This shows that none of the 2 parties believe that the democratic system in the USA works anymore.
          Which means, it’s dead now.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            66 hours ago

            Biden winning in 2020 gave us hope that people were realizing that fascists are full of shit and that they lie about everything, but Trump winning last month has shattered any faith or hope I had left in our two party system. It is hard to believe in a system when people are relentlessly assaulted with right wing propaganda year after year and then ultimately vote for a convicted felon pedo traitorous oligarch who denies climate science.

          • @Boddhisatva
            link
            48 hours ago

            Yes, it is. So the Democrats, and anyone else who wants to try and resurrect it, need to get off their asses and start fighting dirty to rebuild it. The Republicans have been fighting to tear it down for more than 40 years using endless dirty tricks. Time to fight fire with fire. We cannot save democracy with sternly worded letters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        711 hours ago

        Fight fire with fire, if you keep going high the other party will realize it means they can go low and you’ll never do anything about it.

  • Ghostalmedia
    link
    English
    6915 hours ago

    If the republicans don’t like this, the democrats will happily support a supermajority legislature vote that starts limiting executive power.

    • notsure
      link
      fedilink
      812 hours ago

      …in 5, 4, 3, what? who cancelled the countdown? /s

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4915 hours ago

    ITT: people who ignored the persecution Hunter has faced and are judging this on only an extremely shallow level

    • @Serinus
      link
      913 hours ago

      ITT a couple instances acting exactly how you’d expect those people to act.

  • @NocturnalMorning
    link
    5116 hours ago

    I think he’s concerned Trumps DOJ is going to come after them. Still super shady. But that’d be my guess as to why he did it, beyond the whole, he’s my kid thing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3216 hours ago

      Should be illegal to pardon family members honestly. If there was ever an easy example of a conflict of interest, this is one.

      • @AbidanYre
        link
        English
        34 hours ago

        I’d say make it illegal to pardon people who committed crimes to protect you (Ollie North, half Trump’s advisors) first.

      • @Boddhisatva
        link
        68 hours ago

        So what? Maybe it should be but it isn’t. The Constitution places virtually no limitation on the Presidents ability to offer clemency and no one in the last 250 years or so has seen fit to amend the constitution to change that despite the fact that the Republicans have been abusing the power of the pardon since at least the Reagan years. Now you are complaining because a Democratic President has used it *appropriately *to pardon someone who was convicted in a politically motivated circus?

        • @NocturnalMorning
          link
          13 hours ago

          What’s your point? If you break the law, you should be treated like everybody else, not pardoned by the president. It’s a bullshit ability that should be taken away from the president.

          • @Boddhisatva
            link
            119 minutes ago

            What’s your point? If you break the law, you should be treated like everybody else

            That is exactly my point. Others who have committed the same crimes are treated with a slap on the wrist. Republicans, in Hunter’s case, were insisting on heavy handed prosecution and were pushing very hard for a jail sentence. He deserved a pardon exactly because he was not being treated like everybody else.

        • Omega
          link
          4016 hours ago

          For Biden, it was the most difficult decision of his presidency. For Trump, it was Tuesday.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2016 hours ago

          Yep, absolutely. Presidential powers should be used for the good of the country, not the good of your friends and family. There are many legitimate reasons to pardon people but them being related to you is not one of them.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            2615 hours ago

            A fair point but do you think Hunter would have been prosecuted to the same extent if he hadn’t been related to Joe Biden?

            However, it may work out better in the end for him that they went after him for ALL the crimes, because now he’s pardoned for all of them and can’t be tried for them again. We know Trump wants to go after Joe, but he’ll have to come from a different direction.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -1214 hours ago

              If he hadn’t been related to Joe Biden he wouldn’t have had the lifetime of cushy boardroom and lobbyist jobs to lead to being persecuted.

              • @AbidanYre
                link
                English
                1
                edit-2
                4 hours ago

                You’re not going to solve nepotism by showing a picture of Hunter’s dong in Congress.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  11 hours ago

                  Oh no, the millionaire was prosecuted for breaking the law.

                  Oh and don’t forget the unpaid taxes they were after him for as well.

                  Why is everyone so mean to the millionaire presidents son, he has it rough.

          • @TrickDacy
            link
            313 hours ago

            For the good of the country? This was literally always just a judgement call. “I think they deserve a pardon” is the only criteria there ever was. I’m sure there are examples you could claim were good for the country somehow, but I’m not sure how common that is

  • no banana
    link
    25
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I’m not an American, and as such I don’t think it’s my thing to speak on so do not take this as an instructive comment, but I will reflect on it anyway. I believe that this was, on balance, a bad decision even if I understand it and can find good, honest reasons for Biden to do it. In the end, the POTUS has this power and is free to use it as the president wishes. I hope it will lead to something positive.

    The fact that Trump has said that he might pardon Hunter and now is complaining about the fact that Biden did it himself shows once again how everything said by Donald is a convenient temporary truth. Even if this puts the light on Biden also being problematic with this behavior.

    edit: a word

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      3615 hours ago

      It’s a poison pill for pardons. Either they are essentially absolute and irreversible, or they aren’t and all of the ones Trump made and will make are up for debate. He can grumble all he wants but for Trump to call this pardon “such an abuse and miscarriage of justice” is absolutely laughable given the decade of insanity and illegal stuff coming out of his orange anus. The toilet photo of all the documents should have been enough to jail this man for life in a black site but I guess justice is a miscarriage after all.

      • ALQ
        link
        1315 hours ago

        Justice is the one abortion of which they approve.

  • notsure
    link
    fedilink
    612 hours ago

    didn’t we, i of course mean the people who showed up, vote for this very kind of behaviour in the last presidential election? what’s sauce for the goose…