Summary

Russia has imposed a 55.65% tariff on Chinese furniture sliding rail parts, previously exempt from duties, angering both Russian manufacturers and Chinese commentators.

Industry leaders warn the tariff could bankrupt importers, raise domestic furniture prices by 15%, and harm Russia’s furniture industry, which relies heavily on Chinese imports.

Critics note similar European imports face lower duties.

The move has sparked feelings of betrayal in China, despite booming bilateral trade reaching $240 billion in 2023.

The tariff comes amid U.S. sanctions and China’s critical role in supporting Russia’s economy during the Ukraine war.

  • partial_accumen
    link
    English
    931 month ago

    Russia has imposed a 55.65% tariff on Chinese furniture sliding rail parts, previously exempt from duties, angering both Russian manufacturers and Chinese commentators.

    Russia doesn’t know its a vassal state to China yet? Its about to find out.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      471 month ago

      55.65% tariff on Chinese furniture sliding rail parts

      This is oddly specific, both the value and the items…

      • @Aqarius
        link
        English
        81 month ago

        It almost sounds like a message from one of those cold war counting stations. “…55-65-% sign-tarif increase-chinese furniture-sliding rail…”

  • atro_city
    link
    fedilink
    361 month ago

    The tariff comes amid U.S. sanctions and China’s critical role in supporting Russia’s economy during the Ukraine war.

    If Russia loses China over this, who else will they have? North Korea?

  • @Buffalox
    link
    English
    331 month ago

    Critics note similar European imports face lower duties.

    Why the fuck are we still exporting to Russia?

    • @khannie
      link
      English
      91 month ago

      I read it as “European imports from China face lower duties”.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        English
        01 month ago

        The existing trade embargo says otherwise.

    • Dremor
      link
      English
      11 month ago

      The more they relly on the UE, the faster their coffers will deplete.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        English
        151 month ago

        No, if Russia can’t buy what they need, they have to make it themselves, that requires investments, and with steep interest rates, and worker shortage, they are not in a position to increase their productivity.

        There is zero doubt IMO that we should boycott Russia completely, anything less is helping Russia fight the war against Ukraine.

        • Dremor
          link
          English
          01 month ago

          I think both strategies may work.

      • @Buffalox
        link
        English
        01 month ago

        I don’t think so, it’s just that EU tries to strategically hit Russia where it hurts the most. But IMO that’s not good enough. We need a total trade embargo against Russia.

  • Skiluros
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 month ago

    This is honestly a tiny tariff that has no real impact on trade between russia and China.

    • @modeler
      link
      English
      381 month ago

      I agree with your logic and analysis.

      However the non-tangibles here are pretty staggering - Russia is hugely dependent on China and India for exports (basically oil and gas) to raise cash and foreign currency. It also needs high tech goods from China - China provides drones, cars, bikes, clothes and more to support the invasion. And critically a lot of electronics, including those under sanctions being smuggled from the West.

      Placing tariffs on China sends a strong negative message to China - it’s a real slap in the face that will invite a pretty nasty punch back again.

      What on earth motivated this?

      • Skiluros
        link
        fedilink
        English
        131 month ago

        This does seem very strange. I don’t understand why they would even bother with such a specific, minor tariff.

        Perhaps some senior goon (i.e. pretty close to putin, not just a regular oligarch or a regional fief) has money in the furniture business? Still I would imagine it would be easier to implement some sort of local subsidy or corruption scheme as opposed to a tariff against China. It just doesn’t seem worth it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 month ago

          The article notes that Russia has no furniture slide manufacturing. That’s what makes this tariff so baffling. Genuinely not sure why they would do this, there’s no upside.

  • @dogslayeggs
    link
    English
    141 month ago

    Wow, Russia pulling out the big guns here, going after Big Slide.

    • @Agent641
      link
      English
      21 month ago

      If this escalates to tarrifs on the hinge industry, the political tensions could boil over into open war

  • @Draghetta
    link
    English
    61 month ago

    Ok, unpopular take here:

    Based Russia, we should all be doing this - and extend it to all the junk we import from China that we have to replace every year instead of only buying once, flooding them with money and sending local production out of business.

    Just because Russia is a terrorist state that doesn’t deserve their sovereignty and should receive the 1945 axis treatment, it doesn’t mean that they can’t do one right thing once in a blue moon. This is it.

    • @trxxruraxvr
      link
      English
      251 month ago

      In that sense it’s a good thing, but strategically this seems like a very strange decision for Russia. They don’t have many allies left in the world, what they gain for their local businesses might not be worth angering their most powerful ally.

    • @FelixCress
      link
      English
      111 month ago

      Just because Russia is a terrorist state that doesn’t deserve their sovereignty and should receive the 1945 axis treatment,

      It means exactly that. Russia should be at least disarmed if not partitioned into multiple states it took over time.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Protectionism only really makes sense if you’re a country without native industrial capacities and trying to industrialise. Even that is debatable.

      Russia used to be a major world power with highly developed heavy industry and okay-ish light industry. A lot of that has been poorly maintained since the fall of the USSR but the factories are still there. Protectionism makes little sense here.

      • @kreskin
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        A lot of that has been poorly maintained since the fall of the USSR but the factories are still there.

        those factories wre almost all in ukraine.

  • @Crackhappy
    link
    English
    41 month ago

    Oh wow, and so it begins.