Summary

Donald Trump criticized Panama Canal fees as “ridiculous” and demanded lower costs or the canal’s return to the US.

In a Truth Social post, Trump also expressed concern about potential Chinese influence over the waterway, despite no direct Chinese control of canal operations.

The canal, transferred to Panama in 1999, is vital for global trade, handling 5% of maritime traffic.

Trump’s comments follow record revenues of $5 billion announced by the Panama Canal Authority. Panama has not yet responded to his statements.

  • TheLowestStone
    link
    English
    19 minutes ago

    Reality continues to be more absurd than satire. I’m not sure how much more of this i can take.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    553 hours ago

    Damn, that shithead hasn’t even been inaugurated yet and he’s already power tripping.

    May he die very soon.

    • @NotMyOldRedditName
      link
      English
      429 minutes ago

      I think in general this is a problem with how the US elections work, there shouldn’t be this 2 month window.

      • VindictiveJudge
        link
        English
        417 minutes ago

        Lots of things about our elections were designed with the assumption that it would take ages for people to get anywhere, hence the delay. Not really relevant anymore, though.

    • @Gammelfisch
      link
      English
      11 hour ago

      Not sure about him croaking, Just Dumb might be worse.

  • @NocturnalEngineer
    link
    English
    243 hours ago

    The next 4 years are gonna be a blast. Thanks America!

    The trauma of 2016-2020 was still raw, but you guys really love sequels!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    384 hours ago

    I wonder who even brought up the Canal and why? You know there’s no way in hell he thought of that on his own.

    • @x00z
      link
      English
      63 hours ago

      Maybe Troomp checks the economic news for his government picks and saw it:

      Trump’s comments follow record revenues of $5 billion announced by the Panama Canal Authority

      • JohnEdwa
        link
        fedilink
        English
        130 minutes ago

        $5 billion, woah, that sure is a lot of dosh!
        By stealing all the revenue of the Panama Canal for the US, Trump could fund the US military for… a whopping two days.

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    015 minutes ago

    At this point, I’m on board with a global trade war against the US. Build your stupid wall, surround yourselves with it and rot in the Maga stew you voted for. Come back out to talk to us when you’re ready.

  • HubertManne
    link
    fedilink
    42 hours ago

    Its funny because I was against giving it up since we built it but I sure as heck am against taking it back. That is not how stability works. It would be equivalent to crimea and far to close to the fucked up thing we have with israel in the world.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      655 minutes ago

      If you build something in a foreign country under the threat of military invasion it is indefensible to claim “rightful ownership” because you built it.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        -343 minutes ago

        thats not really how it happened. It was financed and france had initiated it and then america purchased the project and completed it. It required a treaty and payments for land use.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          322 minutes ago

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama_Canal

          Great Britain attempted to develop a canal in 1843. According to the New-York Daily Tribune, 24 August 1843, Barings Bank of London and the Republic of New Granada entered into a contract for the construction of a canal across the Isthmus of Darien (Isthmus of Panama). They referred to it as the Atlantic and Pacific Canal, and it was a wholly British endeavor. Projected for completion in five years, the plan was never carried out. At nearly the same time, other ideas were floated, including a canal (and/or a railroad) across Mexico’s Isthmus of Tehuantepec. That did not develop, either.[9]

          In 1846, the Mallarino–Bidlack Treaty, negotiated between the US and New Granada, granted the United States transit rights and the right to intervene militarily in the isthmus. In 1848, the discovery of gold in California, on the West Coast of the United States, generated renewed interest in a canal crossing between the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mallarino–Bidlack_Treaty

          Officially, it was entitled Tratado de Paz, Amistad, Navegación y Comercio (Treaty of Peace, Friendship, Commerce and Navigation), and was meant to represent an agreement of mutual cooperation. It granted the U.S. significant transit rights over the Panamanian isthmus, as well as military powers to suppress social conflicts and independence struggles targeted against Colombia. Under the Bidlack-Mallarino Treaty, the U.S. intervened militarily many times on the isthmus, usually against civilians, peasant guerrillas, or Liberal Party independence struggles. After the beginning of the California Gold Rush of 1848, the U.S. spent seven years constructing a trans-isthmian Panama Railway. The result of the treaty, however, was to give the United States a legal opening in politically and economically influencing the Panama isthmus, which was part of New Granada at the time, but was later to become the independent country of Panama in accordance with the wishes of the United States. In 1903, however, the United States failed to gain access to a strip on the isthmus for the construction of a canal, and reversed its position on Panamanian secession from the Republic of Colombia.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panama–United_States_relations

          The evolution of the relation between Panama and the USA has followed the pattern of a Panamanian project for the recovering of the territory of the Canal of Panama, a project which became public after the events of May 21, 1958, November 3, 1959, and then on January 9, 1964. The latter day is known in Panama as the Martyrs’ Day (Panama), in which a riot over the right to raise the Panamanian flag in an American school became the vicinity of the Panama Canal.

          The following years saw a lengthy negotiation process with the United States, culminating with the Torrijos–Carter Treaties, in which the transfer of the Panama Canal to Panama was set to be completed in December, 1999. The process of transition, however, was made difficult by the existence of the de facto military rule of Manuel Noriega in Panama from 1982 to 1989.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_invasion_of_Panama

          The United States invaded Panama in mid-December 1989 during the presidency of George H. W. Bush. The stated purpose of the invasion was to depose the de facto ruler of Panama, General Manuel Noriega, who was wanted by U.S. authorities for racketeering and drug trafficking. The operation, codenamed Operation Just Cause, concluded in late January 1990 with the surrender of Noriega.[9] The Panama Defense Forces (PDF) were dissolved, and President-elect Guillermo Endara was sworn into office.

          Noriega, who had longstanding ties to United States intelligence agencies, consolidated power to become Panama’s de facto dictator in the early 1980s. In the mid-1980s, relations between Noriega and the U.S. began to deteriorate due to fallout of the murder of Hugo Spadafora and the removal from office of President Nicolas Ardito Barletta. His criminal activities and association with other spy agencies came to light, and in 1988 he was indicted by federal grand juries on several drug-related charges. Negotiations seeking his resignation, which began under the presidency of Ronald Reagan, were ultimately unsuccessful. In 1989, Noriega annulled the results of the Panamanian general elections, which appeared to have been won by opposition candidate Guillermo Endara; President Bush responded by reinforcing the U.S. garrison in the Canal Zone. After a U.S. Marine officer was shot dead at a PDF roadblock, Bush authorized the execution of the Panama invasion plan.

          The history of Panama and the US in general and the Canal in particular is riddled with the US meddling violently in the affairs of Panama and suppressing its people on the behalf of US aligned dictators.

          • HubertManne
            link
            fedilink
            110 minutes ago

            yeah thats fine but all the links before the last were before we even got into the canal which again had its own treaty and predates the UN so this is how things like that were one. Nation to nation. The US has teaties with japan to protect the area to. This is the treaty which spelled out payment and such for the canal https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hay–Bunau-Varilla_Treaty

  • @x00z
    link
    English
    83 hours ago

    It’s like when a friend gifts you a lottery ticket and you win the lottery so now the friend wants it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1226 hours ago

    The UK criticized US presidents mental health as ridiculous and demanded to increase the IQ requirements or the USA return to the UK

    • @Gammelfisch
      link
      English
      21 hour ago

      Even with the shit BREXIT and fucking Nigel, I would be OK with the the Red Coats running the circus.

    • @mPony
      link
      English
      144 hours ago

      Head Of Lettuce demands to be un-wilted and returned to its former position as UK Prime Minister

  • BoofStroke
    link
    fedilink
    English
    375 hours ago

    Trump is that old lady in a backed up check out line arguing with the cashier over her expired coupon. And paying with a check.

    • @chiliedogg
      link
      English
      123 hours ago

      And waving around a nuclear arsenal and the most powerful military in the history of the world.

      • @AngryCommieKender
        link
        English
        73 hours ago

        Congress specifically exempted him and only him from direct access to the various superweapons (nuclear, chemical, and viral) that the US has in stockpile, during his last term. That still applies. He has to get permission from Congress and/or the Joint Chiefs to use them

    • @CheeryLBottom
      link
      English
      44 hours ago

      Or their loose change that was accumulating

  • @Xenny
    link
    English
    12 hours ago

    Hey now let’s not fuck with global trade routes like that now. We are already making other countries uneasy this would make them furious.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    33 hours ago

    Trump “demands” lots of things. Almost all of them are directly against the interests of the party he’s demanding them from.

    He’s a bully who thinks he deserves to get his way all the time in all things. And he’s a crybaby when he doesn’t get what he wants.

    And he’s enough of an idiot to come up with a lot of ridiculous things to try and demand.

  • @Darkard
    link
    English
    746 hours ago

    In other news, Donald trump has demanded that cats now bark.

    • The Quuuuuill
      link
      fedilink
      English
      436 hours ago

      it’s not about thinking this is how it works. it’s about manufacturing consent from his cult

      • Flying SquidM
        link
        English
        266 hours ago

        Why does he need to do that at this point? He won. He’s going to be the dictator. He doesn’t need their support, he can just get it at gunpoint if they don’t like it.