• @seven_phone
    link
    English
    1961 month ago

    Google begins recommending DuckDuckGo.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      I just wish they wouldn’t use Apple Maps.
      Is there a search engine where the maps tab uses Openstreetmap?

      • @ripcord
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        While I guess I’d prefer if they used openstreetmaps, is there anything wrong with Apple Maps other than being less open?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          I find it’s close to useless in comparison. It doesn’t even show house numbers on the map.

  • @MolecularCactus1324
    link
    English
    1901 month ago

    At this point I’ve been using DDG for 7 years as my main search engine. It’s gotten better while Google has become a joke.

    • Lemminary
      link
      English
      531 month ago

      Can confirm. I didn’t think it’d be like that but it do be like that. DDG gang, where you at.

    • @TheFunkyMonk
      link
      English
      361 month ago

      I switched to DDG recently due to the manifest v3 changes and AI junk and have been really liking it. It feels like what Google used to be when it was good.

      • @ripcord
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        You didn’t switch to FF due to the manifest v3 changes? You switched search engines?

        • @TheFunkyMonk
          link
          English
          31 month ago

          Hah yeah I guess I combined those confusingly. It was both of those things hitting around the same time, I switched to FF and DDG.

      • @MolecularCactus1324
        link
        English
        161 month ago

        I don’t know the full story about how Microsoft is developing Bing, but I do know that Google made a conscious decision to make their search results worse, simply so that you’d search more times, which for them translates to additional ad revenue. But, my sense is Bing hasn’t gone this far yet.

      • tb_B
        link
        English
        14
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        DDG does add their own spice on to – or so they claim, and Bing doesn’t have bangs so I’d never want to use it.

        • @ripcord
          link
          English
          11 month ago

          Personally I just use the better in-browser feature instead of bangs

          • tb_B
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            Fair. I could with Firefox, but I’m too lazy to configure all of that for myself.

            • @ripcord
              link
              English
              11 month ago

              Fortunately it takes like 2 minutes.

              • tb_B
                link
                English
                11 month ago

                But doesn’t work on mobile

    • @yokonzo
      link
      English
      101 month ago

      Can’t wait until they enshittify, the way I see it, everything will eventually, even Lemmy. It’s up to us to not settle too hard in one place

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        The fact Lemmy is open source and federated makes it almost impossible to enshittify. What are you gonna do, show ads? Third party clients are first class citizens here

          • @ripcord
            link
            English
            21 month ago

            Unless corporations start ruling it somehow, it really can’t enshittify.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 month ago

          One scenario is that normies join en masse and influencers/marketers follow them, and the quality of conversation goes to zero like on all big platforms. You can’t solve this with software.

          • @ripcord
            link
            English
            1
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            That’s not enshittification. Enshiification doesn’t mean “gets shittier”.

            Enshittification is this very specific thing where services are initially good to attract users, but eventually turn to making things shittier for user in pursuit of profit growth - where they can’t really grow the user base any more, so the only way to satisfy wall street’s need for exponential growth is to add user-hostile changes to squeeze more out of existing users.

            That’s not a thing with Lemmy unless it goes corporate somehow.

            Edit: missed that someone else already called this out

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          They get a large enough audience for disinformation campaigns

          Once you see people start defending Russia it’s over

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 month ago

            Once you see people start defending Russia it’s over

            If that’s what you are looking for, the .ml server has you covered already…

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        No, I don’t think that’s sustainable, nor is it sustainable to act as if it were true. Given the lack of resources we have compared to Google or Meta et al., the only way to make it work is to stick with something for the long run, and bake in protections in both the technology and the organisational structure. Being opensource and federated goes a long way there, there’s no real reason why something not for profit would have to enshittify. But people won’t put in the effort to keep building it if they think that’s inevitable.

      • Brewchin
        link
        English
        61 month ago

        The core of what you’re saying has been my approach for many years. Never go “all in” on anything.

        Convenience is one thing (to me, but it’s everything to so many), but it’s just one factor. And if it means I am (or my data is) the product, it costs too much.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      They need to fix the minus syntax/feature. That’s my singular complaint.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1331 month ago

    I remember interviewing at Google years ago (if you’re keeping score, it was 2012/2013 just before their stock hiccupped and my onboarding was killed as I was only a 97% fit), and the guy was religious about page load times. “We cut 200 lines of code if it’ll give us a millisecond of page load speed”, that kind of thing.

    How they’ve fallen.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      551 month ago

      well they don’t need to fight for new users anymore. Everyone uses it already, and children are basically indoctrinated to it: all schools have that as search engine, often they even use google classroom and drive and whatnot on the classes. if they have chromebooks, the chrome browser automatically starts after login even if you don’t want to use it, and you can’t unpin it from the taskbar either

      • @bokherif
        link
        English
        39
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Google sucks so bad that I switched to Bing. BING!

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Duckduckgo is bing. They route their searches there afaik. It’s just a privacy layer, like startpage is a privacy layer on Google.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              4
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              I don’t think that’s true. They are using the index of bing, but the search results are not. At least that’s what I heard, no idea if it’s factual or not.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 month ago

              Duckduckgo also has bangs, which I consider an essential feature.

              Although I use SearXNG instead, since their equivalent is a lot more customisable (although less bangs out of the box).

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                11 month ago

                FWIW you can kinda replicate bangs using Firefox using bookmark “keywords” (I think that’s what they’re called). They basically allow you to create a bang for any site using any trigger characters.

                • @ripcord
                  link
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  Yeah, I use those constantly. For web searching, Wikipedia, work ticket lookups, etc.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                1 month ago

                Yep. I was using ddg but just spun up 2 sear instances for myself. (One on vpn one off)

                What are your favorite searxng customizations / bangs?

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  11 month ago

                  What are your favorite searxng customizations / bangs?

                  Nothing hugely advanced. I added the NixOS wiki to !software_wikis and I also redirect the old wiki to the new wiki (since the former blocks VPNs). I also use the redirect functionality to redirect twitter/reddit etc links to FOSS frontends.

                  I’ve also added a bunch of stackexchange sites with their own keywords.

                  I’ll add you can also use duckduckgo bangs by using !! e.g. !!protondb.

        • JustARegularNerd
          link
          English
          161 month ago

          Careful saying that round these parts, you’ll summon the ducks.

          • @bokherif
            link
            English
            81 month ago

            Honestly nothing is good anymore. Every search engine brings up the same SEO optimized dogshit articles. I sometimes use Arc browser but that’s not really that different than asking ChatGPT.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 month ago

              It’s so obnoxious. I hate researching a topic only to be fed results leading to useless AI spam. The entire thing is clogged up like this. Searching on the internet absolutely sucks, now.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              41 month ago

              Yeah. Really sucks how you need to know what you’re looking for in order to get any use out of a search engine these days.

              For example, if you want to find a “free online video chatroom”, you’re not going to find it by typing those words into google. You need to know, specifically, that there is a free chatroom called https://stumblechat.com/ and type that into google in order to see it.

              The world is fucked.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              11 month ago

              Recently I don’t feel that way after using Kagi. Sure, there’s still some junk, but somehow I’m finding what I’m looking for a lot easier. That search in forums toggle is magical.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        81 month ago

        We really are ruled by corporations.

        I guess this is why it was so important to neuter the government and public institutions. Can’t have regular people with control over their own lives.

  • Liam Mayfair
    link
    fedilink
    English
    841 month ago

    Feels good not to care anymore about the unrelenting enshittification of Reddit, Twitter and Google since I switched away from them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    711 month ago

    Cool. As if the over-promotion of AI garbage wasn’t enough of a reason to stop using it.

      • @neclimdul
        link
        English
        201 month ago

        This keeps getting better! Tell me more!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          All I know is that when I disabled java in Firefox:config

          It loaded the gpt.com page or whatever it is and you can type but never submit anything.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -2
              edit-2
              1 month ago

              Java isn’t Javascript, but that ham analogy is dumb as fuck and I feel bad for anyone who internalizes it after hearing it from someone else.

              • JackbyDev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                41 month ago

                How is it dumb? Ham and hamsters are two totally different things but sound similar. Java and JavaScript are two totally different things but sound similar. It’s a way to immediately explain to a non technical person in a way they can grok.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -31 month ago

                  It’s dumb because it can’t be reliably extrapolated to other instances.

                  It’s perfectly reasonable for someone to think Java and JavaScript are related. It’s not reasonable for people to think ham and hamsters are related.

                  This is a result of badly naming something because the ECMAscript creator wanted to ride the coattails of the ‘hot new thing’ at the time, which was Java.

                  For example, people shouldn’t immediately doubt whether Godot and GodotScipt are related because Java and Javascript are not. Your hamster analogy falls apart here because it only describes an exception, not a rule.

          • @mPony
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            never submit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        No reason that it should, other than businesses collectively lowering everyone’s standards.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    401 month ago

    I didn’t know they allowed you to search without JS before. If you’re at the point of disabling JS, presumably for security or privacy reasons, why not just use DDG which works perfectly well without JS?

      • @chaospatterns
        link
        English
        41 month ago

        Do these old browsers not support DuckDuckGo?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 month ago

          DuckDuckGo forces TLS while google doesn’t, so you can use IE5 or an old Safari with Google, but not with DDG.

        • Kairos
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Do you think their owners know of duckduckgo?

          • @chaospatterns
            link
            English
            5
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            How many users are using browsers that are old enough they don’t even support JS? It’s one thing to disable it for security/privacy (which the OP was talking about), because those users are probably more tech savy.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 month ago

                What’s the experience like when reading threaded conversations like Lemmy? Is it possible for you to post a screenshot?

  • @atrielienz
    link
    English
    331 month ago

    Doing this to combat bots like they aren’t also using bots to scrape data from the internet is interesting.

    I wonder how this affects modified/custom search engines (like udm14).

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Udm14 is just a query parameter to open google with the “web” results tab. Still works.

      • @atrielienz
        link
        English
        21 month ago

        I know, but I have it set as a custom search engine and what I’m saying is, if someone were to use it in chrome would it still require them to enable java. I think that answer is that it would. I don’t use chrome so I’m not gonna test it.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    271 month ago

    Just makes me realize that I haven’t used Google search in like over a year now because I use Kagi. Even before that i was using searx-ng.

  • ZeroOne
    link
    English
    26
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    You can use these instead of Google:

    1. SearXNG
    2. MetaGer
    3. Brave
    4. Mojeek
    5. PriEco
    6. SwissCows
    7. Yandex {It’s really good for Torrenting}
    8. LibreX & LibreY {Gives you google search results in a privacy-respecting way Without JavaScript}
      • ZeroOne
        link
        English
        11 month ago

        deleted by creator

    • @douglasg14b
      link
      English
      31 month ago

      Kagi too.

      I like the results, especially for research. Definitely worth it for me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Yacy Run your own alternative. With the possibility p2p that others find your crawled pages the other way around. Screwed in p2p that you only get results from others but don’t share any yourself. Complete island mode - no p2p takes place and can also be operated offline locally. You control the crawler, the results well just anything.

  • palordrolap
    link
    fedilink
    221 month ago

    If the British civil service, even operating under previous administrations, can put together a multi-functioning government domain that runs reasonably well without JavaScript, there’s no reason Google can’t continue to do the same with a ducking web search.

    The former works better with JavaScript, that’s true, but it works OK without and that’s the point.

    Then again, the civil service were ordered to do it largely out of spite because the government didn’t want to give the plebs any excuse for not being able to use the site.

    I’m not sure how to get Google to lose the need for scripting in the same way.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      I think this isn’t a case of if Google can, but rather of why they should. Do enough people really use the modern web without JavaScript to justify spending the resources to test and maintain functionality without JS? And they probably don’t want to let the few people that don’t have JS to open support tickets or write articles about how google.com is broken. Easier to just block it on purpose than to let it decay.

      It makes more sense that a government website would support it, since they can’t let even a single person fall through the cracks, and changing laws/regulations is more difficult than making a company decision.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    211 month ago

    🥱

    I fucking hate how these companies get so bloated and then start doing whatever the fuck they want.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    181 month ago

    the widely used programming language to make web pages interactive

    I hope we aren’t talking forms and input fields, right?

  • @dx1
    link
    English
    171 month ago