• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    16511 days ago

    It’s worth watching the whole video, AOC is the type of politician that actually has a chance to have a party that represents the working class.

    • @Brkdncr
      link
      9011 days ago

      I hope the Democrats can figure out before the last minute that she’s a really viable candidate for President.

      • @WhatAmLemmy
        link
        English
        7011 days ago

        Most D’s are captured by most of the same corporations and oligarchs as the R’s. They will never allow a working class movement. Only corporate-whore lite.

        • @Eatspancakes84
          link
          1110 days ago

          If so, they are in for hard wake-up call. Most corporations/oligarchs are rapidly shifting their allegiance to Trump. Those sweet donations will stop flowing to Dems.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1310 days ago

            Perhaps this is one of the reasons why the Dems are also shifting right: to capture back corporate donors, instead of listening to the wants and needs of their base.

            Welcome to Democratic neoliberalism.

            • @Eatspancakes84
              link
              610 days ago

              Yes I think that’s possible, but it’s a strategy that will surely fail. They cannot very well pass the GOP on the right, and they cannot out-Trump Trump. The 2024 election has shown that there were insufficient moderate voters. The upcoming cycle will teach the Dems that there are now also insufficient moderate donors.

              Only chance to win is to go towards economic populism, and with Trumps billionaire cabinet it has never been easier.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -16
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          this “not pure enough to be purely really absolutely 100% air quotes left left” talk Is what helped Trump get in office. but I suspect you know that

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2111 days ago

            And the “You can’t mention the shortcomings of the Dems or else you want Trump” talk is what helped Kamala lose the office. but I suspect you know that

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              611 days ago

              But why talk about the failings of one person when we can concentrate on the more achievable goal of fixing stupid for half the population? /s

          • @TankovayaDiviziya
            link
            6
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Jaysus, liberals should just admit that they themselves benefit from growing wealth inequality as much as the right does. Who are the ones who keep voting down to build affordable housing in proudly blue states, especially California and New York? Why should the working class vote for a party that make empty promises and giving only breadcrumbs?

              • @TankovayaDiviziya
                link
                410 days ago

                Yup, total in denial. Liberal policies has been “we’re not our opponent” instead of addressing housing crisis and job offshoring.

                If the liberals goes further left than they are now, then they shouldn’t complain why the Trump phenomenon exist. It says a lot more on liberal policies than on people in general.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        2211 days ago

        They know she’s popular enough to win a general election one day, just as they knew Bernie was. But the moderate crowd would rather lose with one of their own than win with a progressive

        • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed
          link
          fedilink
          English
          10
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          I mean AOC might become president, that isn’t gonna magically get progressive policies passed. You still need 218 US congressional districts to also elect progressives.

          Edit: And also 50 sentors

          • AngryMob
            link
            fedilink
            510 days ago

            Maybe. Republicans don’t have this issue though, it sorta remains to be seen for dems.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2110 days ago

        My micropenis submarine has already banned AOC from X.com because I saved drowning underaged malaysian soccer players from the pedos in the so-called british special forces.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -410 days ago

        No she’s not. She is a women and Americans well not vote for a woman for president. Sorry it is the truth and they have to stop doing that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          910 days ago

          Find me a woman who isn’t a center-right politician who has ever run. People didn’t vote for women because the women who ran are assholes

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1011 days ago

          We’re probably not far behind, considering most of our top officials are obviously Russian assets.

      • @sunbytes
        link
        19 days ago

        Can private security be crowdfunded? /s

        A lot of others “losing” secret service protection is quite a clue to how the new regime expects violence and intimidation to be enacted.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1010 days ago

        Really? I mean she might be great but she is a women. America choose trump over a women. If the Dems run a women again then they deserve to loose again. They you and me might be fine with a women president but America is not.

    • Mayor Poopington
      link
      English
      3111 days ago

      Why the Democrat party doesn’t capitalize on that is proof the billionaires control everything

        • @rockSlayer
          link
          1411 days ago

          You’re asking for proof of billionaire political capture? How about superdelegates, or the billionaires on stage at the DNC, or the Democrats bending the knee to AIPAC by pushing out AOC?

        • @Sanctus
          link
          English
          12
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          A “young” 74 year old with throat cancer

          • @Shardikprime
            link
            010 days ago

            Oh yes, here comes the billionaire controlling what I write here:

            Ni!

    • @Mog_fanatic
      link
      1511 days ago

      She’s in a tough spot because she dislikes a lot of what the Democratic party is doing and also refuses to even meet with lobbyists let alone take their money. To a ton of everyday people these are very good things but to either of the parties this is an enemy to the party that doesn’t have the firepower to win an election. Of course, I would absolutely love to be wrong on this but history (especially recently) is not on her side.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 days ago

        In the 2020 primary Bernie and Warren were regularly leading in donations. And in 2016 and 2024 Trump won despite raising less money throughout most of the campaign. Big money is not the be all and end all of politics, and when people believe in a candidate large sums can be raised.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -2711 days ago

      She’s is a fucking sheepdog, that’s all she is. Giving disenfranchised voters the illusion that if they stick around long enough, they too can have a seat at their table. She’s a snake in the grass that cannot be trusted.

      • AngryMob
        link
        fedilink
        1110 days ago

        With this attitude you must trust absolutely 0 politicians i guess? Where do you go from there?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          110 days ago

          I’m with you. I mean I agree with their sentiment and I think AOC is the same as the rest. She is after all a part of the machine.

          That said, it’s worth distinguishing the difference between trust and hope. I always hope.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        710 days ago

        Why do you say that? Everything that I’ve heard her say has been principled and thoughtful. I haven’t read anything about her actions that I find problematic either.

        So… citation needed?

  • @DaddleDew
    link
    1511 days ago

    So much for getting rid of “the elite”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -511 days ago

    Very true, but it’s not like Harris was signaling she was going to eliminate billionaires by seizing all of their wealth. So both parties are the same, right?