President Trump’s new head of the Federal Communications Commission has ordered an investigation of NPR and PBS, with an eye toward unraveling federal funding for all public broadcasting.

“I am concerned that NPR and PBS broadcasts could be violating federal law by airing commercials,” Chairman Brendan Carr wrote on Wednesday to the presidents and chief executives of NPR and PBS, Katherine Maher and Paula A. Kerger, respectively. “In particular, it is possible that NPR and PBS member stations are broadcasting underwriting announcements that cross the line into prohibited commercial advertisements.”

The FCC does not directly regulate the two networks. Instead, it evaluates the actions of roughly 1,500 public broadcasting stations across the country, which hold licenses granted by the FCC for use of public airwaves for radio and television, even in the digital age.

  • @athairmor
    link
    112 hours ago

    Gonna investigate Koch for his NPR sponsorship?

    Yeah, didn’t think so. This is fascism.

  • @DrFistington
    link
    52 hours ago

    NPR doesn’t have ads, they just mention the names of underwriters. Not only that, but they’ve been tame, if anything, in regards to their coverage of Trump.

    If this is what he’s wasting government time and resources on, We’re at the 4th box

  • Lemminary
    link
    18
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    How about investing non-profit churches for illegal political activity? Oh weird how that’s not a priority.

  • @RememberTheApollo_
    link
    52 hours ago

    Talibangelicals going after knowledge and more honest reporting? Wait until they go through the museums and remove anything critical or against their agenda.

  • @Bieren
    link
    406 hours ago

    This isn’t about ads. This isn’t about them getting too much funding….they aren’t. This is about them not blasting the propaganda 24/7 and making massive profits for the talking Cheetos butt buddies.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    947 hours ago

    “I am concerned that NPR and PBS broadcasts could be violating federal law by airing commercials"

    Could you do us a solid and investigate every single other channel for the same thing? That would be pretty sweet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      235 hours ago

      Not sure if you’re being sarcastic, but just in case: they’re using this excuse specifically because the stations in question are publicly funded and their charter prohibits them from airing commercial advertisements. Of course, the fact that they have to take funding from corporate sponsors in the first place is a pretty good indication of just how insufficient their public funding is. And then there’s the annual pledge drives…

      But yeah. I’m sure he’s real concerned that they might be violating federal law. So very concerned.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        12 hours ago

        Thanks for the info! I did kinda figure it had something to do with being public funded, but I couldn’t pass up an opportunity to make a joke about hating commercials lol

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    13
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    If the corporate sponsors really want to support PBS and NPR, they’ll quickly trim the announcements to a bare minimum mention.

    I for one will be paying attention.

    If anyone in authority at NPR happens to read this comment, I’d like to point out that it’s possible to report on what the current president and his administration are doing without subjecting listeners to his mosquito-whine voice before we’ve had our coffee. Your Morning Edition journalists can quote him in their mellifluous tones, we’ll still know it’s the bloodsucker.

  • @NJSpradlin
    link
    48
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    They know good and fucking well that gov’t funding for NPR and PBS is so fucking small a percentage compared to what they pull in annually from donations from corporations and individuals, that they’re going directly after those contributors by taking away the measly ‘thank you, pajamagram, for your contribution’ call outs. Anything and everything that can be attributed to malice when attacking or gutting programs should be.

    Edit: also, I’ve purchased twice from pajamagram because of their call out and donations to NPR. If anyone at NPR or pajamagram reads this comment, your donation ad worked on me.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      47 hours ago

      The proper response might be for NPR and PBS to just privatize and rely on donations for the duration of this shitty administration.

      • @ChicoSuave
        link
        256 hours ago

        Being private in a time of predatory billionaires is a bad time. They will be consumed and become a shell of their former selves, like Sesame Street after HBO bought them.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          I’d normally entirely agree with you - we trust the government to keep the predators from devouring public services…

          But right now those predators are in the Whitehouse and both PBS and NPR are too valuable to be allowed to become conservative propaganda tools.

          This isn’t a simple situation and pretty much all options come with significant downsides.

          • @ChicoSuave
            link
            44 hours ago

            NPR and PBS receive single digit funding from federal funding. They would be better suited to remain that way and having the freedom to continue publishing their own content than go private and be steered by profit minded board members. Going private opens them up to a hostile takeover. Remaining public gives them more freedom.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              14 hours ago

              Being public exposes them to being taken over by the administration. Going private as a non-publicly owned entity with a stewardship board would likely end up increasing their journalistic freedom. Overtime corruption would likely seep in (as it has with most news organizations) but it’d likely start out quite mission driven.

              Things like takeovers and corrupt boards only happen if greed is allowed to be a driver.

  • Cyborganism
    link
    fedilink
    217 hours ago

    If Mister Rogers was here today, I don’t think even he could save PBS from this psychopath.

    • @Skyrmir
      link
      English
      117 hours ago

      Don’t mess with Rogers and his blood stained sweater.

      • @falidorn
        link
        25 hours ago

        Rogers would be victorious over all, as proven by the ultimate showdown.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    45 hours ago

    Wow, that’s so crazy that Republicans care about stuff like this now. I’m sure there isn’t any political agenda behind it

    • Lemminary
      link
      3
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      It’s all altruism for the people (above in the last tax bracket).

  • Flying Squid
    link
    27 hours ago

    Bye, Big Bird. I love you and I will miss you.

    • @athairmor
      link
      22 hours ago

      Sesame Street sold out to HBO who eventually dropped them like a ton of bricks.

      They may not make it but not because of this. They were relying on DVD sales until streaming killed that and HBO picked them up. HBO got the new content first, PBS got reruns.

      Who knows what will happen, now.

    • @alekwithak
      link
      13 hours ago

      It’s okay, Sesame Workshop is a separate non-profit, and makes approximately jillions in merchandizing annually. I’m sure it will continue on in some bastardizes, heavily privatized form.