if you’re poor when you get the money, you still get taxed for being poor, and the sin of class mobility. only money made AFTER you get rich is safe.
Doesn’t matter, your life will be ruined either way by everyone around you that wants a piece of the pie.
Life pro tip: don’t win the jack pot. And if you do, keep it as much a secret as possible.
There’s a guide out there about what to do if you win.
Basically, tell nobody before you talk to a senior partner in a big law firm, get trusts set up for yourself and the people in your life so everybody is looked after and you can’t fall below a decent living wage even if you fuck the rest up. This also stops people hounding you for a slice and destroying your relationships.
Then there was stuff about setting up investments, and setting aside some spending cash.
Personally I’d want to put most of the “investments” into various mutual aid projects to build lasting social stability rather than using it to further the stock market, but other than that it’s pretty good advice.
and it’s altadena, which was recently the hub of some pretty big mutual aid efforts, so there’s a chance some of that might actually happen!
I’m not sure what the venn diagram of people into mutual aid and people who buy scratch tickets looks like, but I’d suspect it’s a small overlap.
But hey who knows, if this stuff is getting more popular traction then I might be wrong about that.
into? probably. helped by? probably larger.
The reason it gets cut down so much is the advertised jackpot is the 25 year pay over time annuity amount. You get only about half if you take lump sum. And THEN that’s taxed at a high bracket.
Half? So they could get 850 over 25 years? That’s 34 million/year… Or 2.8mil/month… In what world is that not enough? Unless you’re afraid they’re gonna stop paying you after like a year or two, which is fair, especially in this day and age… yeah, okay, I’ve changed my mind, I’d take the lump sum too… not risking it.
The rationale behind taking the lump sum is that if you take a lump sum now and invest it, you can live off the proceeds from the investment and the overall value will outstrip inflation and the losses from the taxes and you can take advantage of compound interest to really ramp things up. You can actuality make more money in the long term by taking less now.
Yeah, if you’re financially responsible you can totally do that. Most people, however, from what I’ve heard, aren’t and don’t really make good use of their winnings. When you win that much, however, pretty hard to go back to being poor no matter which way you go.
Other than “they’re gonna stop paying you” there’s also the risk of inflation making it so you receive way less overall, since I doubt the amount gets adjusted to match inflation.
But yes, if the jackpot is so high that you’d get 2+mil per month, assuming you’re so worried about the dollar being worthless soon, you can still take the 2mil/mo and diversify. After a year you should already have plenty money to live comfortably for the rest of your life.
Could you withold from being taxed from your lottery win until you get a lawyer to put all that money into a tax haven, and then pay the tax in pennies? I mean, if billionaires could get away with stashing their money into offshore and tax havens and pay pennies in taxes, why couldn’t this instant billionaire do the same?
Nah. There’s a reason the parasites insist on getting most of their pay in stock and benefits.
most of their pay in stock and benefits.
You have a great point. This is crypto before crypto became a thing.
Because it isn’t that simple, especially if the government already knows exactly how much you’re getting and from where
Yep, it’s that last part in combination with the other comments point. They know with absolute certainty that you got that money, but the other billionaires keep all of their money tied up in “assets” before the government gets to take a look at it
Damn is it really like 80% tax
it was a $2.04b jackpot. would have paid out that much as an annuity over like 25 years or something. taxes would have been withheld from those payments.
the ‘lump sum’ option was $997.6m, which is what the winner opted for. after taxes the amount received was actually $628.5m.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/2-04-billion-powerball-winner-200153929.html
whoever pulled the $424m out of their backside took another dose of taxes out of the payment that already had taxes deducted.
They did that to make it sound worse than it is.
Wait a minute… Are you suggesting someone on the internet lied for attention?! I don’t believe it!
I know, It’s getting so that you just can’t trust unsourced images of alleged tweets talking about political topics on social media anymore.
smh my head
Edit: disregard, California doesn’t tax lottery winnings on the State level
The listed amount is actually an annuity that pays out over like 25 years. The base lump-sum amount is usually only around half of the listed amount. So a $2b win would only pay out about $1b in cash. And then that cash amount is heavily taxed.
You should almost always choose the cash option even if the annuity is a “larger” total, because the annuity’s rates very rarely beat inflation rates over the 25 year time period… So you’re better off just taking the cash as a lump sum and investing it in index funds and bonds, which will virtually always beat inflation rates over time.
But all of this is to say, it’s not quite an 80% tax rate. It’s more like 55%, once you consider the fact that the cash option is already only about half of the listed winnings.
It’s about the annuity amount. You’re right in a straight race to make as much money as possible. But once the annuity reaches something like 200k it’s far safer for most people to take the annuity. You can buy nice things, quit your job, and invest. Crucially though, if you fuck everything up, you get topped up again next year. It’s an exercise in how much money do you really need? For example how much boat could you buy and maintain for 8k/mo? I suspect the answer is, a lot.
Lottery winners usually have a choice of getting their winnings paid out over the course of twenty or thirty years, or as one lump sum. If they take the lump sum the winner only gets about half of what they would with the annual payments. So assuming this guy took the lump sum and got $1B the tax would be closer to 60%. Still a lot, but $450M is nothing to sneeze at.
Getting the money over 20 years seems so stupid, it won’t give you any interest and over 20 years just because of inflation it will be probably worse than 50% less…
And yet at 40 million a year, I don’t think inflation is going to bother you ever again. That’s good advice for relatively small payouts like 10k, but at a certain point the annuity becomes an effectively unlimited credit line.
Plus, if the company goes out of business, you’re fucked.
At least in my state, the lottery is run by the state government. The taxes from it go to schools.
The taxes from it go to schools.
Dozens of people have gotten a chuckle out of this over the years. dozens!
I mean, the taxes from the lottery do. What that don’t tell us is the taxes originally earmarked for schools now go to something else.
That depends entirely on how good you are at managing your money. With regular payments you’d still have a ridiculous amount of money even the first month, and no matter how badly you fuck up you’re still rich 20 years from now.
Unless the government collapses in the next 20 years and can’t pay it.
If the government collapses then your money is worthless anyways.
Oh, there’ll still be a government. But they may not be willing to ship his checks to the labor camp.
Yup, you’d be far better off doing doing the “buy, borrow, die” strategy and never paying taxes like other rich people
That wouldn’t work to reduce lottery taxes. The lottery itself isn’t return on investment in stocks or whatever, and can’t be held indefinitely the way an appreciating stock can.
Yeah I was referring to specifically taking a lump sum and what to do with it as opposed to taking the payment plan
The merits of lump sum versus annuity aside, the point is that the headline number comes from a naive total of how many payments are made in the annuity option. So when it’s listed as a $2 billion jackpot, it’s actually worth something closer to half of that as a lump sum.
Looks like the taxes are closer to 37.5%
The way it works in America is that the amount they tell you is after a 30 year annuity, so you obviously get a lot of interest there. It also lets them bump their numbers up which makes it more attractive I guess. Currently Powerball is at 320 million with a cash value (or lump sum) of 150 million. After that you get taxed and knocked down more so you might end out taking home around 100 million. As someone who has not won, I can say that sounds like bullshit, but if I did win, well I wouldn’t be complaining. What would I use the extra money on anyhow? Get some dude who wears orange facepaint the presidency? Hard pass. I’d have to be a gigantic friendless turbo nerd to do some shit like that.
I know I am the minority in this but I would take the 30 year payment. Let’s use the 320 million as the example. It would prevent me from spending it all on dumb shit and I could easily live off of 888,000 a month pre tax. Pay off all debts right away and force me to save up for any huge thing I want.
It would also pass to my kids if I die in the next 30 years.
It is still in your favor to take the lump sum, then invest it yourself. Even low risk low return you’ll likely end up way ahead compared to the payment plan.
I agree about the investment, I’m just saying that this prevents me from falling into the “ohh I can buy that” trap.
For me, I have two concerns (like it matters, I’m never winning). The organization running the lottery could fold and I can likely make more investing the lump sum myself. Plus I really want to start a nonprofit grocery chain.
Even worse is that if the state you won in had financial issues they can and will hold payments until the budget is balanced. I recall hearing something about Illinois holding lottery payments when there was a shutdown.
Facts and statistics say the organization running the lottery is IMMENSELY less likely to run out of money than YOU. Take the annuity. Winning the lottery does not suddenly make one smart with money.
Up until recently, I’d take the annuity, but right now, the stability of the underlying currency and the organization that pays out is in serious doubt.
Even in today’s political climate I’m pretty sure the State of California will still be able to make your payments over 30 years. If you didn’t spend it on anything else, you could make a start on that grocery chain. You’d probably learn a lot in the first few years, some expensive lessons. But having started small, you could put the next payments towards putting those lessons to work as you expand. Meanwhile, you’re not investing any attention or risk into those funds. But you do hypothetical you!
Editing to add, the guy who actually won might be able to do some real good in his own neighborhood, which had that big wildfire.
Fuckin hell that payment would pay off my mortgage in 20 days. I cannot fathom spending that much every fucking month
Americans try not to bring up Trump in every conversation challenge
As an American, I don’t get it at all. I don’t WANT to talk about him unless it’s pertinent. My average blood pressure has literally gone up about 10mmHg in one month, I don’t need more stress.
No, the top tax rate is 37%.
With lottery prizes, the full amount is usually only available as annuity payments over 20-30 years. If you pick a lump sum, it’s typically only 40% of the full amount.
This winner chose the lump sum payment, so his lottery prize was about $600,000,000.
Thanks everyone for replying. I forgot these rules because they’ll never apply to me…
Can’t have the peasants luck-ing into their class. It would mean their ruse is revealed.
Old money hates new money. That’s why lottery winners are taxed so much.
Arguably he’s been taxed before he got rich… So the poor still got the whole tax burden.
And they say they don’t tax the rich
deleted by creator
