Nothing says “classy” like flying that flag.

Good L🍁ck Trudeau! (But also, don’t let the door hit you on the way out…)

  • tehWrapper
    link
    English
    26 hours ago

    Saw a f🍁CK Trump flag in Canada the other day and had to do a double take. I don’t like Trump, but I still don’t like the flags.

    • jackeryjoo
      link
      English
      72 hours ago

      I believe in that case, the flag is warranted.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9413 hours ago

    Trudeau will be remembered for many things

    including all the conservatives that wanted to fuck him.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      72 hours ago

      Many men were disappointed when arriving at the Ram Ranch to find Trudeau wasn’t there.

      But they made due.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 hours ago

      This is in regards to our brethren down south, poking fun at 2nd amendmenters and their manly façade. Seems like cons all over the globe mostly like to larp as strong men but like if you gotta hide behind a firearm, are you really manly? 🤷‍♂️

      “Hurt me but make me feel safe at the same time, you pussy liberals” https://youtu.be/TY0eUQ06Q2g

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 hours ago

      He is a thirst trap though even after ten years in office. He’s only 53 seems very young to retire. I’m curious to know what he does next. UN ambassador? Ambassador for Canada to France?

    • Lemminary
      link
      117 hours ago

      Just finding out I’m a raging conservative. Oh god, I need to sit down… On his lap…

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      3411 hours ago

      I loved that the original attack ad they had when he was first running for Prime Minister was that he was too young and handsome to be a leader.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        48 hours ago

        I’ll also always remember how the Liberals pulled a judo-reverse on the Conservatives by turning their main line of attack back against them. I knew from the moment I saw that ad with Trudeau on the escalator that the Liberals would win.

        • Lemminary
          link
          8
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          Oh, do you have a link? I’m not Canadian but that sounds interesting.

          E: Nvm found it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            4
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            That’s the one.

            I don’t know if my memory of that era comports with actual history, but this is how I remember it playing out:

            It looked like the Conservative attack ads were going to win the election for them again, just as they had against Dion and Ignatieff. They were ahead and gaining in the polls, and the Liberals seemed to have no response. The slogan was, “Trudeau: he’s just not ready.”

            Then the polls stabilized for a few days, and the Liberals released that ad. The polls started rapidly reversing, and the Liberals decisively swept into power. I don’t think I even saw another, “he’s not ready,” attack ad from the Conservatives again after that.

            EDIT: One can debate how much of an effect that ad had, and whether Trudeau’s actions matched it’s promises, but for me it will always stick out as a good bit of political strategy.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            54 hours ago

            In hindsight he was the best leader they had in a long time

            But the Cons are kind of like the scorpion and the frog and I did not trust them one bit.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 minutes ago

        That was defintely the beginning of the end for Trudeau. And lost him all the young voters.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        257 minutes ago

        Proportional representation is not the answer because the party system does not work to begin with.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          253 minutes ago

          But proportional representation does not require political parties to be a part of the electoral system.

          See single transferable vote (STV): A Simple Guide to Electoral Systems. It’s still a work in progress, but lays out a good framework for discussing electoral systems.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            110 minutes ago

            But proportional representation does not require political parties to be a part of the electoral system.

            I never said proportional representation requires political parties. I said, and I quote, “Proportional representation is not the answer because the party system does not work to begin with.” meaning the system PR is being tacked on to doesn’t work and we aren’t fixing anything switching from FPTP to PR if we keep the party system.

            The party system is the single biggest issue with our Politics. It prevents independents from ever being elected and allows a few parties to control the entire political landscape and narrative.

            Which is why the entire history of Canada has been Conservative Government, Liberal Opposition or Liberal Government, Conservative opposition on a federal level excluding that one time because the right old white guy lead the NDP.

            The point is we need a complete overhaul, and not a tune up so electoral reform should mean the entire system if we are going to go through with it because it is a huge undertaking.

            I also do not need to have you pretentiously offer me “simple guides to political systems” because I think you are wrong.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              13 minutes ago

              There isn’t a modern democracy in the world that doesn’t have political parties. And for good reason, it’s wholly impractical. Even single party states such as China have political parties…

              The reason we have two major parties is described in Duverger’s law. You don’t have to think I’m right or wrong, because this is just the reality.

  • Haess
    link
    fedilink
    811 hours ago

    I’m trusting he’ll lead the country in the right direction through all this tariff nonsense.

    • Swordgeek
      link
      fedilink
      151 seconds ago

      Nope. @JohnnyCanck has a good explanation of what just happened, but some other info to add.

      We’re heading into a federal election soon, and the Conservative Party (right of the Democrats, and infused with a handful of Trump-level nutbars) held a solid lead for several months. When Trudeau announced he was stepping down, followed by Trump’s tarriffs, the lead shrunk to roughly the margin of error.

      Carney is fairly conservative for the Liberal party - he was appointed to lead the Bank of Canada by a (very!) Conservative PM, and then went on to head the Bank of England. He’s a money manager for the rich, which is concerning, but also might draw some of the centrists back from the extreme right.

      There’s a fair chance that our next government will - again - be a minority, which will require the collaboration of parties, and often is when the most good gets done. Or we might get a CPC/Poilievre majority, in which case we’ll be sucking up to Trump like a vacuum for four years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        19 minutes ago

        Kisses, and you should block me if my comments upset you so much. It’s super easy on lemmy.

    • @[email protected]OP
      link
      fedilink
      4212 hours ago

      Not yet, we still have hope it won’t happen.

      Our system is a bit different. We elect a party and that party has a leader. The leader of the elected party is the Prime Minister. The leader can step down and the party stays in power and selects a new leader, who then becomes Prime Minister. Trudeau stepped down and his party selected Carney to replace him, so we have a new prime minister and maintain a centrist government. (Centrist to us, left wing to the US.)

      We can also have elections at any time, either by choice of the party in power, or forced by the opposition parties if they have enough seats in the government. Our current party in power, The Liberals, don’t have a majority, so they’ve been maintaining power by making deals with a left wing party (the NDP or New Democratic Party). Liberal + NDP is one seat or so from a majority right now, so they’ve been finding additional support from other parties. This has actually worked out pretty well, as it has forced the government to be a little more proactive and given the left a good amount of power. There is always the threat of losing power and having to make different parties happy.

      If the NDP (or others) decide they don’t like Carney, they can force an election and then we will have the chance of getting that Conservative government you were worried about. Most likely they will wait a bit to see how things are going before doing that because their worst fear is forcing an election and ending up in a worse position (a Conservative majority.) If you hear that Canada has a new Prime Minister named Poilievre in the next year, you’ll know we just ran into the same shit you guys did.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        221 minutes ago

        The leader can step down and the party stays in power and selects a new leader, who then becomes Prime Minister. Trudeau stepped down and his party selected Carney to replace him

        Just to clarify further, the party did not select him. Liberal voters voted for Carney at an overwhelming majority.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1712 hours ago

        Thanks for explaining that. It sounds like a better system in that you can force an election at any time. I’m jealous of that right now.

        I know the PR and propaganda machines have been going after Canada. I really hope you guys don’t get forced or go willingly down the same road as us. I’ll be looking for that Poilievre person to not be in the running.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 hours ago

          you can force an election at any time.

          Thing is, a government with a majority will often easily win a no-confidence kind of challenge. Especially true of conservatives, whose core strength is blind loyalty, there’s no point in trying.

        • @OrteilGenou
          link
          1212 hours ago

          You can force an election for a minority government. If one party has a majority, it can go for a while, more then four years

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            412 hours ago

            Okay, I’m not jealous of the 4 year part unless it has some hidden benefit. Maybe moving that slow keeps it stable?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              22 hours ago

              Maybe moving that slow keeps it stable?

              That’s not how long it takes. We have regional non-conservatives in power here, and they seem to be launching spurious confidence challenges every week. I think their plan is to have so many that people stop showing up and supporting the evil non-cons.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              912 hours ago

              It wouldn’t be a problem if we had proportional representation. In Canada, a party can get a majority government with a minority of the voting population due to how it’s calculated. This often means low voter turnout because a large number of people feel their vote doesn’t count.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                12 hours ago

                It wouldn’t be a problem if we had proportional representation

                Is there nothing it can’t do? (when all you have is a hammer, everything’s a nail)

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                512 hours ago

                So you have the same problem as us. I think in the olden days, our corrupt politicians and elites colluded with the world’s corrupt politicians and elites, and had a good laugh how they set it up in their favor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1612 hours ago

        Oh, got ya. It hasn’t happened yet. Good luck to you fighting our stupid economic wars that we, the US, are certain to lose.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 hours ago

          economic wars that we, the US, are certain to lose.

          Any victory will be pyrrhic. Maybe we’re hoping to pick up a state or trade for Alberta. ;-)