• Neato
    link
    fedilink
    2071 year ago

    /s is an excellent modifier for sarcasm. There’s no tone in text and bold/italic can only do so much. And with how many absolute crackpots are posting all over the internet, I’d prefer to be sure to not lump in a jokester with the absolute nutjobs.

      • Ignacio
        link
        fedilink
        181 year ago

        It wouldn’t be the first time I get myself into a trouble because of that :(

      • Veraxus
        link
        23 months ago

        …and writing tone… for the same reasons. 😬

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -41 year ago

        That’s the only legitimate defense for having to tag your sarcasm I’ve ever read.

        Back in MY DAY, nobody tagged their sarcasm on BBS or IRC and we ALL UNDERSTOOD AAAAA (but srsly for folks who have trouble with tone you’re fully right.)

        • @candybrie
          link
          121 year ago

          What are you talking about? Even usenet in the 80s recommended using emoticons to mark sarcasm/joking remarks.

          Avoid sarcasm and facetious remarks.

          Without the voice inflection and body language of personal communication these are easily misinterpreted. A sideways smile, :-), has become widely accepted on the net as an indication that “I’m only kidding”. If you submit a satiric item without this symbol, no matter how obvious the satire is to you, do not be surprised if people take it seriously.

          Source

          • Veraxus
            link
            13 months ago

            This. I remember having a text file of emoticons back in the day because I couldn’t remember what they were supposed to mean (and often didn’t mean what I thought). :-/

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            That’s a valid point! I forgot now many emoticons I’d use back then. I’ve always hated pointing out my sarcasm using extra things, though… I prefer to do it using italics, which is reeeeal helpful on Reddit where it goes over nobody’s heads at all.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -51 year ago

        As someone with autism, I’m here to say that it is actually the opposite of helpful.

        People need challenges in order to grow. They need opportunities to fail.

        Putting training wheels on sarcasm makes autistic people even further behind the social curve by depriving us of opportunities to fail.

        Much like a sterile childhood environment has been scientifically proven to be a causal factor in developing allergies as an adult, I predict that science will eventually establish a causal link between lack of ambiguous communication during developmental years, and reduced intelligence in life.

        Human society is so fucking hard to understand for an autistic person, and I really appreciate your looking out for me, but the struggle is worth it, and human culture is intricate and beautiful, and that’s why I chose this username.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          291 year ago

          Okay but lots of other autistic people I know really appreciate tone indicators so you cannot really speak for everyone. Not to mention, why does knowing that something was meant to be sarcastic hinder learning instead of essentially guessing?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          You misunderstand, this is from my own perspective as an autistic person. Plus, the lack of tone of voice over text can make communication harder, for everyone. It’s literally just a tool for communication, clearing up what you mean.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -11 year ago

            But that’s the point of sarcasm. Jonathan Swift got lots of death threats by mail after writing “A Modest Proposal,” and he expected it! If someone doesn’t want to risk being misunderstood, they should not write the opposite of what they mean.

        • @themajesticdodo
          link
          -41 year ago

          How ever did autistic people survive before the internet to help them cope?

          • @starman2112
            link
            31 year ago

            I mean a lot of neurodivergent people literally didn’t survive until a few decades ago

    • Seraph
      link
      fedilink
      211 year ago

      To me it’s born out of this moment: “Wait, will someone see this joke and think I’m serious? If they did they’d think I’m a psycho…”

      • Paradoxvoid
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        People on Reddit are scared of downvotes affecting their karma score, so they have to tag controversial comments to make it absolutely clear if their comment is sarcasm.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          171 year ago

          I have used it because my sarcastic comment, read at face value, might encourage someone to support something I despise. I’m not interested in creating or bolstering that shit, I just want to make fun of it. Karma points never had anything to do with it. I had millions but what’s a million nothings, still nothing. Reddit Karma is just multiplying by zero.

        • @starman2112
          link
          21 year ago

          Personally I used it to keep shinigami eyes users from tagging my then-universal handle as problematic when I made an off-color joke. I’ve been banned from subreddits I never heard of because of something I said as a joke in a totally different subreddit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Am i wooshing myself??

        That is literally the point of sarcasm. People legitimately wanted to murder Jonathan Swift.

        If you write “/s”, just write the direct unironic statement in the first place.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          71 year ago

          If that were holistically true the concept of a “sarcastic tone” wouldn’t exist in verbal speech.

        • @starman2112
          link
          21 year ago

          “If you want to tell a joke in which the humor is derived from you saying something incorrect, or something that would be offensive if you genuinely believed it, you should instead just say the actual truth and never use sarcasm again”

          That’s actually such a good idea, it would make life on the internet so much better /s

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            If you want to make a joke, assume that some people won’t get it. If you don’t want any ambiguity then no, do not use sarcasm. If you write “/s”, you’re not being sarcastic at all, you’re just using a double negative.

            • @starman2112
              link
              21 year ago

              That’s not what a double negative is

    • Hildegarde
      link
      111 year ago

      That’s the best part of internet sarcasm. There is little in this world that is more fun than a 6 reply deep argument between someone making serious counterpoints to my sarcastic comments, while I try to see how much more sarcastic I can become before they figure it out.

      Putting a tag up absolutely ruins the fun.

      • @mriormro
        link
        101 year ago

        I’ve found most people online feign sarcasm as a way to defend their ego more than anything else.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 year ago

          Or they imagine everyone is hating on them because they didn’t get the sarcasm. No, we got the sarcasm. It’s just a terrible joke.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      /S Is aN ExCeLlEnT MoDiFiEr fOr sArCaSm. ThErE’S No tOnE In tExT AnD BoLd/iTaLiC CaN OnLy dO So mUcH. aNd wItH HoW MaNy aBsOlUtE CrAcKpOtS ArE PoStInG AlL OvEr tHe iNtErNeT, i’d pReFeR To bE SuRe tO NoT LuMp iN A JoKeStEr wItH ThE AbSoLuTe nUtJoBs.

      • @candybrie
        link
        151 year ago

        I definitely prefer /s over this style of sarcasm.

      • @baronofclubs
        link
        121 year ago

        I’d much rather “/s” than this. Though the difference may be small, this text reads as sardonic, while sarcasm may not always be meant in a mocking tone. Plus readability is important to me.

      • @starman2112
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        tHiS is only useful for short phrases. Saying more than one sentence in this style makes me just skip the paragraph because it’s annoying to read.

        • @starman2112
          link
          21 year ago

          Right? There’s literally no other way to make it clear that you’re being sarcastic

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      I lot of use of /s just indicates that there are a lot of jaded people making snide comments. We haven’t gotten to that stage yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s the whole point of sarcasm though, that the delivery seems genuine. Don’t write the opposite of what you mean if you aren’t willing to have some people misunderstand you.

      And yes, people who use sarcastic tone in conversation are also missing the point. They also should not say the opposite of what they mean.

      • Neato
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Sarcasm was developed in spoken word. If you are using the written word, it needs to be painfully obvious if you want the meaning to come across. But due to Poe’s Law, that’s becoming harder and harder these days. Especially in the political and human rights discussion.

        No one is forcing you to use /s. But shitting on people using it because you don’t think it’s “pure” is asinine and also abelism.

  • @Tenniswaffles
    link
    1311 year ago

    Well, we certainly didn’t leave that signature sense of superiority behind.

        • @robocall
          link
          31 year ago

          But your mom told me I was special

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      Honestly, that’s so much worse here… The atheist posts are making me cringe pretty hard. I’m am atheist, so that’s saying something.

      It’s like we got the best, and the worst, from Reddit.

      • @TheDoctorDonna
        link
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Or “for the sake of Lemmy, don’t…” or something along those lines when you disagree with someone.

        Isn’t proper discussion supposed to have disagreement? Was the point of Lemmy to create a centrist echo chamber? People should disagree sometimes, we have to be reminded to consider outside perspectives sometimes, even if we don’t like that perspective.

    • @DrQuint
      link
      English
      0
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -801 year ago

      Correct. They’re merely cognitively insufficient to successfully model the minds of the people they talk to.

      • @Thoth19
        link
        231 year ago

        Good thing poes law doesn’t exist forcing us to be more explicit about what is and isn’t a joke.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Poe’s “Law” is a simple self-fulfilling declaration that communication has failed. It’s not even a postulate about the nature of reality. It’s a declaration that we give up.

          To call something like that a “Law” is ridiculous.

          Declaring that confusion exists is a way to create confusion.

      • @starman2112
        link
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        “they’re merely cognitively insufficient” fucking 🤓 nerdass, go back to reddit with these reddit-ass insults

  • @starman2112
    link
    751 year ago

    “This website that I and others like me decided to migrate to is much better than the place I left. That must mean everyone who decided to come here is super smart!”

    Don’t get so full of yourself that you burst.

  • @JustAbe
    link
    471 year ago

    I’d much rather have /s than comments that start with, or just say:

    This.

    Absolutely annihilates my patience towards humanity.

  • @SexyTimeSasquatch
    link
    461 year ago

    This is some solid grade A pandering. You’re aware there’s no karma to farm, right?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        I mean… No it won’t. Like, we all know better at this point. We’ve all seen by how some of the worst people alive live.

        Comfortably. They live comfortably.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    441 year ago

    Maybe, but it seems all the people who think they are better than everyone else because they downloaded a different social media app made their way over here as well.

  • MentalEdge
    link
    fedilink
    411 year ago

    Lemmy is definitely heavily skewing towards early-adopters. Doesn’t mean there can’t be dumb early-adopter tho.

  • @aidan
    link
    361 year ago

    No we have not.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    361 year ago

    Bashing denizens who decide to denote their sarcasm is as /stupid as bashing those who don’t. “Oh no, now that the tone has been set the point is ruined!” Gosh, it must suck to be you, I’m genuinely sorry this is the way your brain works.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      11 year ago

      It’s not that the point is ruined. It’s that it’s no longer sarcasm. The whole point of sarcasm is that it seems like the message is genuine. Ironically, using /s makes a statement unsarcastic.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -111 year ago

      Well no, because the /s tag isn’t symmetrical.

      In cases where the /s tag is used instead of sarcasm being interpreted successfully, there’s no mechanism to determine how well bonded and ready for complex communication a group is.

      It’s similar to banter, where one insults one’s friends in good fun. It’s a readiness test. The guy who gets insulted by your banter isn’t ready to communicate at a complex level with you.

      Same for people who can’t figure out when you’re being sarcastic.

      Misinterpretation of sarcasm is a canary in the coal mine, an indicator that complex topics aren’t going to be successfully discussed here, because there’s too much misinterpretation happening.

      • @rockSlayer
        link
        151 year ago

        Sarcasm is incredibly difficult to interpret over text unless you personally know the person doing it. That’s highly unlikely on the Internet, and honestly it’s just an easy thing to do to ensure people that have difficulty interpreting tone through text can be included. To me, bitching about tone indicators is like bitching over subtitles. It’s not meant for you.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        oh well. Worse than stupidity, we have here a strayed pedantically breeded nonsensical being.

  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】
    link
    341 year ago

    Nah, I still use it. You have to. The tone of voice is non existent. Sarcasm is indistinguishable from stupidity. It’s impossible to tell and be right all the time without /s. It’s just responsible posting to include it.

    Without it, if your sarcastic enough often enough, you’ll run into people who unironically agree with you on whatever you’ve sarcastically said. /s reminds those people who agree with whatever you’ve said that they are stupid.