• taiyang
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 month ago

      The irony is that this meme works in reverse for that. At least, in order of mind blowing as I refreshed my memory, it goes multiplication (very easy), dot (scalars easy), cross (vectors medium) and convolution (integrals hard).

      In fact, I never did the later two but convolution looks fun.

    • Ziglin (it/they)
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      I see multiplication in code, Cartesian product, multiplication, multiplication.

      I might not count as a mathematician though. If the * was supposed to be convolution the a should have been cursive.

        • Ziglin (it/they)
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yes (actually \ast though?), but unless you’re a maniac in LaTeX latin letters referring to variables in a math environment are cursive (actually a math font I think). Therefore if I am reading a single sentence that may or may not have been made using TeX I tend towards not if variables are in a standard font.

    • betanumerus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 month ago

      No. If a is a scalar, which it clearly is, it’s all multiplication. And there is no reason to use any of the first three. We say “three apples”, not “three x apples”.

  • FuglyDuck
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 month ago

    it’s funny, because I always imagined them giggling about typing 8008135 into calculators.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 month ago

        Naw. Mathmaticians are frequently dyslexic.

        It’s grammarians doing it backward!

        • mercano
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 month ago

          Ah, that’s how we wound up with reverse Polish notation.

          3 a *

    • AmericanEconomicThinkTank
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Excuse me, but self respecting mathematicians calculate it properly.

      Now let’s see, it was Dolly Parton had…

    • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      Numbers are all made up stuff, and they’re all the same. Here, lemme prove it; let a=b, and…

      a² = ab             // multiplying both sides by "a"
      2a² = a²+ab         // adding a² to both sides
      2a²-2ab = a²-ab     // subtracting 2ab from both sides
      2(a²-ab) = 1(a²-ab) // isolating (a²-ab)
      2 = 1               // dividing both sides by (a²-ab)
      

      From there you can prove any number is any number. 36=36 or 36=8 or 36=π.

      the trick

      If a=b, you can’t divide both sides by (a²-ab), because it’s a division by zero.

        • Lvxferre [he/him]@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 month ago

          Bingo. The whole “a=b” is just a distraction to hide it, otherwise as soon as you hit the third step you cancel both out, and end with 0=0.

      • mhi
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        1 month ago

        Doesn’t make a difference as 18 = 8

    • DacoTaco
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Because the things like 3a are only for variables, not numbers.

    • Ephera@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, when I found the meme template, it did say that, too, but I wasn’t sure if that information is actually helpful to someone reading alt text. Personally, I only know the guy from the memes. 😅