• @[email protected]OP
    link
    fedilink
    159
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Screenshot of what’s happening for the uninitiated. Bot keeps posting YouTube links and then replying to itself because it detects a YouTube link.

    • JackbyDev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      441 year ago

      You’ve fallen for one of the classic blunders! Never let a bot reply to itself!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        261 year ago

        ahh, I rember that old time I wanted to make a “your mom bot” for discord, one of the function was saying “No, your mom” when someone said in a phrase “your mom”, little did I know that discord bots read their own messages if you don’t check it

    • LinkOpensChest.wav
      link
      fedilink
      351 year ago

      Reminds me of back when it was possible for two out-of-office message services to get stuck in an endless loop

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        121 year ago

        I killed an old exchange server with an auto reply to a coworker who had an auto reply to me.

        Those were the good old days.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 year ago

          I broke my brother’s exchange beta 4 install by telnetting into SMTP port and sending an email with an accidentally typo’d recipient. The bounce bounced, that bounce bounced and it continued until priv.edb was full and the service crashed. After a morning on the phone with Microsoft support he asked me if I did it. They made a hotfix for the bug.

      • @Treatyoself
        link
        41 year ago

        “Stop replying all!! Can you take me off this email thread please?!”

        The people who got pissed off were the best. And the whole company would see it. Those were the days.

    • @sheogorath
      link
      111 year ago

      Someone needs to make a PR to add a check for the username of the commenter that they’re replying to. Should be a simple conditional check.

    • @elFlexor
      link
      511 year ago

      Amazing, imagine writing a bot so annoying that app devs put a specific button in their settings to ignore it. Thanks for the tip!

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        141 year ago

        Alternatively, you can think of it as something so popular and important as to deserve a setting, eg. NSFW filter

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t even understand why the bot exists? If you have newpipe or other yt apps installed, it automatically sends you there when clicking YouTube links. You can do the same within Firefox on PC.

    • @charles
      link
      English
      281 year ago

      I just blocked the user 🤷

      Very cool that you can link settings to an app, though.

      • root
        link
        fedilink
        English
        29
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Lmao, this was the first opportunity I had to post a link to settings. I got way too excited. I need to get out more I guess

        • @NightAuthor
          link
          English
          41 year ago

          What does the UI for a settings page link look like? They just have a share button in settings?

          • root
            link
            fedilink
            English
            41 year ago

            Just long press and it auto copies a link to that setting. Pretty neat

      • root
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Thank you for your work, and the years and years of sync 👊🏼

      • @Ejh3k
        link
        English
        31 year ago

        Thanks for being a step ahead.

  • bodgeit
    link
    fedilink
    63
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    at least there are no grammar nazi bots, yet

    “Pardon the interruption, but there appears to be a mistake in your 3 words reply. Here is a 5 paragraphs post, explaining the history of language starting from mesozoic era and extracts from 5 dictionaries on the word you just misspelled”

    and then they make a separate bot for each possible mistake, so you have to block them over and over.

      • @saltesc
        link
        -5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I can’t imagine anyone that concerned about privacy is so unprepared and unknowledgable online that they need the internet to cater privacy alternatives for them.

        “I dOn’T wAnT mY dAtA aLL oUt ThErE!!!”

        “Totally understandable. So what steps are you taking?”

        “PeOpLe HaVe tO dO iT FoR mE!!”

        So now we all must suffer?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          51 year ago

          The downside of being concerned about privacy is that it can be very inconvenient. I don’t think its so awful to try to minimize that, making it more accessible to people that wouldn’t otherwise bother.

  • LoudWaterHombre
    link
    fedilink
    30
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think its great to avoid YT.

    Yes I automatically open YT links with invideous.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    291 year ago

    I blocked that bot long ago. I don’t want to see a website being advertised on every video link on every Lemmy instance.

    • @FooBarrington
      link
      561 year ago

      I don’t see it as an advertisement. It’s the same as e.g. the AMPutator bot - it provides a convenient way to circumvent Google’s monopoly.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        I guess it would feel less intrusive if it weren’t four spaced out lines where most comments are one.

        Regardless, even if it’s for a good cause, it is an advertisement. It’s informing users of Piped for the purpose of getting them to use it. Existing Piped users already have a convenient way to set up redirects, which have been posted several times.

        I guess it seems a lot nicer to people who actually want to use the service, but to people who don’t, it’s just advertising.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    221 year ago

    Invidious, Piped, etc. instances come and go. We shouldn’t link to them and break links.

    let’s just install LibRedirect or Privacy Redirect extention and just pick our own.

    • Dizzy Devil Ducky
      link
      fedilink
      English
      91 year ago

      If I could get either LibRedirect or Privacy Redirect in my Firefox based mobile browser I totally would. I’m just not 100% sure whether or not the feature from Firefox Beta allowing for using collections of desktop extensions- if the extension you want even works on mobile- has come to normal Firefox for android yet.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      As far as I can tell that’s another way to link to piped.kavin.rocks aka not any instance but rather the official one, I highly doubt that will go away…

  • Gormadt
    link
    fedilink
    141 year ago

    It also doesn’t work properly if you share a clip from a YouTube video

    The link it posts just takes you to the full video

    • @devfuuu
      link
      51 year ago

      A clip? What is that?

    • @NightAuthor
      link
      English
      41 year ago

      Does piped support clips at all? I guess not, cuz the bot basically just swaps YouTube.com for piped.whatever so piped is handling the /clip/… but only playing the whole video