• Flying Squid
    link
    1421 year ago

    Why wasn’t he immediately thrown in jail for that?! Fucking rich people.

    • @30mag
      link
      English
      172
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
        link
        fedilink
        671 year ago

        This is gonna be like Capone: All these crimes and the thing that gets Trump behind bars is violating a gag order.

        Because you know he can’t abide by it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          301 year ago

          Because you know he can’t abide by it.

          If there’s any such thing as Incitement Tourette’s, he’s got it.

          • crawley
            link
            231 year ago

            Stochastic Terrourette’s Syndrome

        • @lando55
          link
          English
          51 year ago

          Question since I’m genuinely lost when it comes to this - does forcing a gag order by these actions benefit Trump in any way? Does it ensure no one is able to speak about the case, or is it just limited to him?

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            IANAL - in both senses - but I don’t see how a gag order on other people would pass constitutional muster, especially with this Supreme Court.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            11 year ago

            It’s limited to him. It would be in incredibly broad and against the 1st amendment to say other people couldn’t discuss it.

      • @PunnyName
        link
        261 year ago

        Should still be in contempt of court either way.

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          6
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

      • Flying Squid
        link
        151 year ago

        Ok? And? Why wasn’t he thrown in jail for that? I read the article.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          171 year ago

          Because that’s not technically illegal until the gag order, which went into effect after the post was made.

          • Flying Squid
            link
            71 year ago

            It’s not illegal to threaten someone?

            • @bhmnscmm
              link
              141 year ago

              He wasn’t threatening. He was insulting. The word “attack” is misleading in this context.

              • Flying Squid
                link
                131 year ago

                The threat wasn’t explicit, but it was certainly implicit. That’s why he posted her personal social media info. He is fully aware he has an army of followers that will take that and run with it. I don’t think that he should be able to get away with that so easily.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  61 year ago

                  Which is why he now has a gag order. The act of posting someone’s ig isn’t illegal, but now it is with the gag order.

              • @paintbucketholder
                link
                21 year ago

                He was also inciting his followers.

                Whether or not it rises to the level of “inciting imminent lawless action” is a different topic, but it’s not like he was merely insulting someone to their face - he was pointing tens of millions of his psycho followers at her.

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          3
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Flying Squid
            link
            41 year ago

            I expect the judge to do something about it once he found out more than a narrow gag order, but apparently that’s asking too much.

            • @30mag
              link
              English
              2
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

      • @dangblingus
        link
        91 year ago

        Why does the defendent get to be on his phone during his own trial?

        • @30mag
          link
          English
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • Dettweiler
            link
            61 year ago

            Us poors can’t bring cell phones into the courthouse.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              Err, what courthouse are you talking about? Never seen an outright ban just gotta silence/turn it off.

              • Dettweiler
                link
                11 year ago

                Every courthouse I’ve been to in my area will not allow cell phones inside. Must be a state-based or county-based thing.

      • @EdibleFriend
        link
        81 year ago

        Fucking seriously. This man is bad enough without clickbait bullshit.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      111 year ago

      For real! Putting it on social media WHILE IN COURT, should be the same as if he stood up and said it in front of the judge.

    • @Nurgle
      link
      151 year ago

      I’m so tired of people saying the headline was misleading because they lack basic reading comprehension… but that’s not the case here. Was expecting to see he threw his phone at the clerk or something.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        That would have been great to see on video… but he probably would have missed her “Bigly”.

    • @Cryophilia
      link
      31 year ago

      They worked on this one, I guarantee it. They know what the fuck they implied. Clickbait bullshit

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    551 year ago

    Man, this guy is committing more crimes as he’s on trial for crimes.

    Posting their IG account is pretty much a direct threat by mobilizing his stupid fans.

    • Optional
      link
      221 year ago

      More crimes for him to never be held accountable for. Chalk it up, Merrick. It’s on your watch.

    • @xc2215x
      link
      111 year ago

      Trump knows his supporters very well.

  • @2piradians
    link
    English
    401 year ago

    This is who they choose for their savior, this geriatric child. He’s like the classic fast food manager who still has the high school mindset, but with money (for now) and inexplicable influence.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    371 year ago

    "The New York judge presiding over Donald Trump’s civil fraud trial on Tuesday issued a gag order after the former president attacked his clerk by name and shared her image on social media,” The Messenger reports.

    Said Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron: “Personal attacks on members on my court staff are unacceptable, inappropriate, and I won’t tolerate it.”

    • Optional
      link
      311 year ago

      A little late there judge. Hopefully the rest of your peers will not be so dumb about letting him wreak havoc and destruction the only way he knows how.

      What, did someone think he wouldn’t scream for murders to be committed against any and all? Time for everyone who was, uh, unclear in 2016 and/or 2020 to get their shit together. The man is a demented narcissist rapist fraud and it will Never. Get. Better.

      This farce is running WAY too long.

    • Bizarroland
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      I would legitimately pay $5 to see a picture of trump angry as fuck sitting in court where he knows he’s guilty as fuck with duct tape on his mouth preventing him from doing anything more than making humming noises through his nose.

  • @rustyfish
    link
    English
    201 year ago

    “Schumer’s girlfriend, Alison R. Greenfield, is running this case against me. How disgraceful! This case should be dismissed immediately!!” he wrote. Despite his claim, there is no evidence of a relationship between Schumer and Greenfield beyond taking a photo together at one point.

    It doesn’t matter. The average trumpster is so fucking dumb, they will eat it up. Warping it into a fact in their heads.

    • chaogomu
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      It’s called stochastic terrorism. When Trump publicly names someone as an enemy, he won’t be the one to physically attack them.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      I read this as “the average trumpeter is so fucking dumb…” and assumed you were either trombone or French horn. 😄

  • Silverseren
    link
    fedilink
    171 year ago

    The comments on Twitter are brain-meltingly stupid. The MAGA morons actually think Greenfield is Schumer’s girlfriend because Trump made that post.

    • @aseriesoftubes
      link
      241 year ago

      If they had an iota of critical thinking skills, they wouldn’t be Trump supporters in the first place.

  • AutoTL;DRB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Former President Donald Trump attacked Judge Arthur Engoron’s clerk in a now-deleted social media post while in the courtroom with her on Tuesday.

    Trump appeared in a New York courtroom for the second day of his trial of Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit alleging that he committed business fraud.

    James accused the former president of inflating his net worth by billions of dollars to obtain benefits such as better bank loans and reduced tax bills between 2011 and 2021.

    He posted a photograph taken of Greenfield with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat, calling for the case to be dismissed over the picture.

    Politico reporter Kyle Cheney wrote, "Trump, on Truth Social, is attacking Judge Engoron’s *clerk,—who is literally in the courtroom with him—while calling her ‘Chuck Schumer’s girlfriend’ and posting a link to her Instagram account.

    Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested a gag order in the federal case surrounding the January 6, 2021, riot at the United States Capitol building.


    The original article contains 566 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • @Mago
    link
    101 year ago

    Why this awful reddit-style click bait? The truth about Trump is bad enough as is, no need to lie about him.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Trump attacking people with words is common. If he physically attacked her, probably the term “assault” would be used, and also, the headline wouldn’t have to point out that she was physically present at the time.

  • @cbarrick
    link
    English
    -21 year ago

    Damn. Newsweek has sunk so low from their former self.

    From the headline, I thought “attacked” meant “assaulted,” and that’s obviously the connection the editor wanted me to make.

    But no, Trump made a disparaging post against this woman on his fake Twitter network. Shitty, but not as bad as the headline implied.

    • Drusas
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      You should just be glad they didn’t say he “slams” her.