House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) responded on Sunday to a report by The Daily Beast that highlighted his apparent lack of a bank account on his financial disclosure.

The response, however, did not actually answer whether he had one.

Fox News Sunday moderator Shannon Bream pressed Johnson on whether he had a bank account, citing a Vanity Fair write-up of The Daily Beast’s report and noting that “there’s been so much made about it.”

“Can you clear that up for us?” Bream asked.

Johnson did not.

“Look, I’m a man of modest means,” Johnson said. “I was a lawyer, but I did constitutional law, and most of my career has been in the nonprofit sector. We have four kids, five now, that are very active. And I have kids in graduate school, law school, undergraduate. We have a lot of expenses, but I can relate to everybody else. My father was a firefighter, right? I didn’t grow up with great means. But I think that helps us to be a better leader because we can relate to every hard-working American family. That’s who we are. And I think it governs and helps govern my decisions and how I lead.”

  • TinyPizza
    link
    fedilink
    156
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    This guy has three kids in college and no fucking bank accounts… Dude, is this guy congress Clarence Thomas? Fuck, it feels like these people are all body snatchers!

    edit: a word

    • @dhork
      link
      English
      817 months ago

      Maybe someone should subpoena his FAFSA and see how much free money he is getting to put his kids through college

  • ivanafterall
    link
    fedilink
    937 months ago

    We have four kids, five now, that are very active.

    Talk about a real-time update. “OH, THIS JUST IN, SHE’S POPPED OUT ANOTHER ONE!” Or did he just briefly forget about the black one?

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      37 months ago

      If it was a normal person I would cut him some slack. Your memory goes to shit when you are a parent about kid stuff. Kids go from potato to walking talking eating machines in a year. There are moments when you see them do something and you are like “how are you bicycling, I feel like I just changed your diaper about a month ago?”.

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      We have four kids, five now, that are very active.

      Talk about a real-time update. “OH, THIS JUST IN, SHE’S POPPED OUT ANOTHER ONE!”

      To be fair, he was probably thinking about the children that he has to spend real money on, and not the young/newborn(?) one who’s expenses are very modest at this point in comparison.

  • @Viking_Hippie
    link
    807 months ago

    “Look, I’m a man of modest means,” Johnson said. “

    Yeah, he’s modest about how many means he’s hiding from the IRS.

    most of my career has been in the nonprofit sector.

    Specifically the Christian Right sector, which is extremely lucrative compared to most officially for profit sectors

    I can relate to everybody else.

    Said the man who’s famously a bigot who wants government to be based on his interpretation of what his imaginary friend wants 🤦

    we can relate to every hard-working American family. That’s who we are. And I think it governs and helps govern my decisions and how I lead.

    I think I’ve cracked the code! In his vernacular, “relate to” means “abuse and steal from”! #MysterySolved

    • @RaoulDook
      link
      English
      77 months ago

      Probably getting paid by church money under the table without being taxed.

      I’ve met regular people who do that and admitted they weren’t paying taxes on the church wages, so even the little guys are getting away with that

    • @Adalast
      link
      37 months ago

      I had a fantasy last night where I became president and made the CEO/board of directors culpable for any illegal activities of the company then placed a banking embargo on every non-extradition country. Double whammy, they run, can’t access their US assets, they stay, can’t access their tax haven accounts.

  • @BassTurd
    link
    737 months ago

    How does he get his paycheck? If he actually receives a paper check, how does he cash it?

    • @dhork
      link
      English
      327 months ago

      Gold bars, of course. Oh wait, you mean his paycheck from the US Government, not the other ones, don’t you?

      • spaceghoti
        link
        fedilink
        227 months ago

        I mean, it makes sense. Where in the US would he be able to cash a check for rubles?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      227 months ago

      He’s been in government since 2017 or earlier, and gov jobs require electronic payment. Period. I have no idea how this motherfucker can get paid by the federal government without a bank account.

      Please someone explain.

      • @AstridWipenaugh
        link
        47 months ago

        If the Rs are going to continue supporting Santos and Clarence Thomas, they’re not going to do shit to this NatC for doing far less.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 months ago

          If the Rs are going to continue supporting Santos and Clarence Thomas, they’re not going to do shit to this NatC for doing far less.

          well, yeah, they’re fascists. they still support trump.

          I still want to know how this fucker gets paid by the federal gov without a goddamned bank account. In the 90s the army finally forced everyone onto direct deposit and that was one of the last federal programs to finally get electronic payment going iirc. Direct Deposit doesn’t work without a bank lol

          • @AstridWipenaugh
            link
            27 months ago

            I meant to imply that he absolutely has accounts and is simply committing an ethics violation by not reporting them. There’s no way a white collar person can exist in society without having a bank account, especially given your point that direct deposit is a requirement for him specifically. The only people that can do anything about it is the majority party in the House, and they don’t care.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              The only people that can do anything about it is the majority party in the House, and they don’t care.

              yep, there’s only republican accountability for non republicans. and women. and lgbtqs. and people with melanin. or in a minority situation.

              yep. fuckers

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          37 months ago

          according to the reporting there’s no bank account in his, his wife’s, or his kids’ names. No trust, no assets, nothing.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      17 months ago

      I knew people who would cash a check for you for 5%. I imagine as a Congress person he doesn’t have to do that

  • @xenomor
    link
    537 months ago

    His creepy affect and smirk just exudes ‘hiding a kiddie porn dungeon’ vibes.

    • kamenLady.
      link
      147 months ago

      Absolutely… The first time I saw him in a pic, i shrouded at the smirk. In all the images I have seen him in since, he looks like he’s constantly on the verge of some kind of orgasm, always this dismissive smirk in his face.

  • @PeleSpirit
    link
    English
    40
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      267 months ago

      Yep. It’s required for accounts totalling more than $5000, because a poor politician is easier to buy off than a rich one.

      So unless he’s flat broke (unlikely for a Republican), he’s hiding assets.

      • @hdnsmbt
        link
        57 months ago

        a poor politician is easier to buy off than a rich one.

        Nice thought but probably not true. See literally any US politician. Or Supreme Court judge.

          • @hdnsmbt
            link
            37 months ago

            But a man with a lot of money is much more likely to be greedy than a man with no money.

            • @afraid_of_zombies
              link
              17 months ago

              Yeah I don’t understand this logic either. You have to follow a higher ethical standard the lower you are in practice. Our political system should reflect what the real world is.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      27 months ago

      Or is he saying he just hired the actor to play the son?

      That would be hilarious. Some little person who pulls off his mask and starts talking with an Eastern European accent. Lights up a smoke. “I left homeland for this”.

  • @halferect
    link
    267 months ago

    Answers that are sus for 1000

    • @Alexstarfire
      link
      77 months ago

      I’d go for 100. The lowest amount has the easiest answers.

  • @ghostdoggtv
    link
    257 months ago

    It’s a simple question and the criminal didn’t answer it

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      67 months ago

      Maybe we should ask his porn accountability partner, his 17 year old son.

  • BabyWah
    link
    217 months ago

    You get a red flag! You get a red flag! Everybody gets… no you get a red flag!

  • @xX_fnord_Xx
    link
    17
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Somehow I’m getting two-three texts every day from this scumbag, though I’ve never voted conservative or signed any conservative petitions.

    Different number every time, so I can’t block them.

    Help.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      77 months ago

      If you opt out and still get texts, you can probably file a complaint with the FCC or some federal agency.

      • Cosmic Cleric
        link
        English
        37 months ago

        Any email given to any government agency becomes public and purchasable by third parties.

    • @afraid_of_zombies
      link
      27 months ago

      Respond back, get on the phone with someone. Sound crazy. Make up absurd crackpot ideas and demand that they agree with you such as James Madison wasn’t a Mason he was an alien and is Speaker Johnson aware of this and investigating?

  • @afraid_of_zombies
    link
    67 months ago

    It is amazing how all the verbal tricks and rhetoric don’t work when it is written out.

  • @CharlesDarwin
    link
    English
    67 months ago

    This weird little man is weird, even by GOP standards.

  • guyrocket
    link
    fedilink
    -897 months ago

    I’m not really sure why this matters. Is really just about him not disclosing something? Because I really don’t care if he has a bank account it not.

    This seems like a distraction from real issues.

    • @d00ery
      link
      487 months ago

      How does he get paid? How does he pay bills? Do you not think this is strange?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          387 months ago

          Cant follow the money to see who owns him if there are no accounts. For any adult with a roof over their head, to not have at least one bank account is very odd, and for a politician, very sus.

          • @Spellinbee
            link
            237 months ago

            Plus, even if he really doesn’t have an account, then that’s worrisome as well because if you’re struggling to pay for your kids tuition, that raises concerns about being more susceptible to bribery. That’s why one of the things they look into when you get clearance is are you struggling financially.

          • guyrocket
            link
            fedilink
            -517 months ago

            Can’t see the bank account without some sort of legal action. Not sure what you’re imagining but that seems like a silly line of thought. Do you really think every financial move a person makes goes through their bank account? If anyone is stupid enough to put payoffs or other ill gotten gains in a bank account along with their “normal” money then they’re amazingly stupid. I would find it VERY hard to believe that anyone would do that.

            It may be odd, but I don’t find it relevant. He can hide money under his mattress if he wants, I really don’t care.

            This is a distraction from any real issues. If people want to “take him on” then do so on the issues he will deal with as a member of the house.

            I find this whole “let’s gettem” approach to politics a BIG distraction from real debate on real issues. Not to say that we should allow politicians to do whatever they want but let the investigators do that. So the media spend their time with BS like this instead of asking the real questions on real issues. The public debate is not engaged for the sake of a non-existent bank account.

            • @utopianfiat
              link
              English
              497 months ago

              He’s a US Representative. He was asked under oath to disclose it under penalty of perjury. He committed a felony. What the hell is wrong with you?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          287 months ago

          I think the point is uts REALLY strange, and might be indicative of problems/concerns that actually matter.

    • @utopianfiat
      link
      English
      447 months ago

      You don’t care if the Republican Speaker of the House is taking bribes. Okay.

      • guyrocket
        link
        fedilink
        -437 months ago

        Guilty until proven innocent, right?

        Where do you buy your pitchforks and torches?

        • @utopianfiat
          link
          English
          227 months ago

          No, he’s proven guilty for failing to properly disclose his finances as required by law.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          187 months ago

          The people are allowed to ask questions of and demand explanations from our elected representatives. He works for us and we want answers. Who the fuck are you to even imply otherwise? WTF is wrong with you?!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          157 months ago

          This isn’t a court of law. Is that the burden you live by when hiring a nanny for your kids? That literally anyone who isn’t convinced of a crime is perfectly fine to watch your kids?

    • @ReluctantMuskrat
      link
      27 months ago

      So him lying on financial disclosures is of no concern?