• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    475 months ago

    GNU wasn’t mistaken for Unix though, it was made as a piece-by-piece foss replacement for all the proprietary Unix tools. Everything about this meme is wrong!

    • @AnUnusualRelic
      link
      24
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Absolutely. Gnu was made to be specifically different from Unix which was becoming locked down by AT&T copyrights. Gnu wasn’t Unix, and therefore still isn’t.

      • @platypus_plumba
        link
        24 months ago

        I’ll upvote the post only because I want more people to upvote your comment.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    315 months ago

    I use GNU is not Unix is not Linux + Linux in a distributed form called Fedora using a display protocol called wayland on a Desktop called KDE btw.

        • callyral [he/they]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          35 months ago

          It used to be K Desktop Environment, but it’s called Plasma since KDE became the organization behind KDE Plasma. This is because they make things other than the desktop environment, like apps such as Krita or Kdenlive, which aren’t DE specific.

    • @Klear
      link
      45 months ago

      So GNUNUNL+L?

  • @Moshpirit
    link
    305 months ago

    GNL is difficult to pronounce or longer if you spell it.

  • @blackernel
    link
    21
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    More semantically than some other answers, GNU software is generally on Linux computers, so if GNL was Not Linux, than it would be even more confusing for it to be on a Linux computer.

    I think if you need to make the destiction, GNU+Linux is probably the best option for the whole software set and kernel included and if you want to talk about the operating system, I think naming your distribution and following it up with “a distribution of Linux” would be the most accurate, if you are in a situation where accuracy counts.

    I use Arch, btw.

  • @JackLSauce
    link
    195 months ago

    Ah yes, the highly-demanded name change people are definitely arguing should happen

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    18
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Okay but for more clarity sake. LINUX IS NOT UNIX. I don’t care how many certifications or random university teachers mix the two up, they’re wrong.

    Linux has only one bit of history with Unix and that is the fact it was made because there was no easily accessible Unix source code for Linus and other students to use. Linus made a Unix-like os. Hence Lin-ux. But it’s not Unix. It doesn’t use any Unix source code. It’s not based on System V or any other official Unix version. Linux is Unix in name only. Its POSIX compliant and has a few POSIX certified distros, but it’s not Unix.

    This fact is what made it so favorable to devs worldwide. Unix having his history as a proprietary operating system with a confusing license situation where AT&T would seemingly go sue happy at random made Unix scary and unfavorable.

    Linux was built from the ground up. It had no such history. If Linux were Unix this couldn’t possibly have been true, and it certainly wouldn’t have gone on to take over the server and smart phone markets.

    Linux is not Unix.

    Unix is not Linux.

    MacOS is not Linux.

    BSD is not Linux.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      25 months ago

      People say Mac is BSD, haven’t heard it called Linux

      It’s referred to as Unix for the conventions it implements not from being built out of

  • @Perroboc
    link
    95 months ago

    Linux Is Not UniX? Linux?

    • @voodooattack
      link
      175 months ago

      But you’ll be the EMPEROR, and the EMPEROR Must Please Emerging Renegades Of Recursiveness.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        YAML will be granted a grace period as a recursive acronym, but as punishment they must remove the questionable contraction and will henceforth be YANML.