A former Mississippi political candidate is facing criminal charges after a bedazzled statue of Baphomet, a figure associated with the Satanic Temple, was discovered decapitated at the Iowa State Capitol.
Michael Cassidy, 35, a former U.S. Navy pilot, told Fox News that he saw the controversy surrounding the display, which was heavily criticized by Republican politicians like Ron DeSantis, and drove to the Iowa Capitol to see it for himself. He said it hit a “nerve” and went on to destroy it.
…
According to an archived version of his campaign website, Cassidy pushed for a 10-year prison sentence for anyone who destroys a statue in his own state.
You must log in or register to comment.
For reference, the seven tenants listed next to the destroyed display:
I One should strive to act with compassion and empathy toward all creatures in accordance with reason.
II The struggle for justice is an ongoing and necessary pursuit that should prevail over laws and institutions.
III One’s body is inviolable, subject to one’s own will alone.
IV The freedoms of others should be respected, including the freedom to offend. To willfully and unjustly encroach upon the freedoms of another is to forgo one’s own.
V Beliefs should conform to one’s best scientific understanding of the world. One should take care never to distort scientific facts to fit one’s beliefs.
VI People are fallible. If one makes a mistake, one should do one’s best to rectify it and resolve any harm that might have been caused.
VII Every tenet is a guiding principle designed to inspire nobility in action and thought. The spirit of compassion, wisdom, and justice should always prevail over the written or spoken word.
It makes a lot of sense to me why Christians would be against this.
I absolutely love how the TST actually stands for the shit christians have pretended to care about for centuries.
Hail Satan!
Tenets to live by if you ask me. I wished we all did.
TIL I’m a Satanist.
As am I, apparently.
Welcome! As in all things, be mindful of those with ill intentions, but most of us are perfectly swell people. :)
A little late but we all are svelte ppl yeah baby yeah. Edit: Svelte swedish, just to clarify. Means starved. Yeah. Now you know. Starved for knowledge yeah
Wow that really hits a nerve!
What a jackass. Meanwhile supports statues of people who lived by the credo of “I feel so strongly that people should own other people as property that I’m willing to kill for that right, look here’s my gun!”
“tenets”
Huh, didn’t even know. Thanks
I’m not changing it.
Yeah, it’s difficult to take issue with any of those.
Personally, I don’t need (or want) the baggage associated with organized religion in order to believe and follow those tenets, so I’m not a member. But I’m a big fan.
Christians have an utter landslide of reasons to believe the most outlandish of complete nonsense, but I’ve always been a fan of science, facts, and reality.
So I thank you. <3
He has since been released, and raised $40,000 in legal fees following praise from Republican politicians and far-right pundits across the country.
This is the real travesity.
Just another story reminding me how rich I could be grifting money off these assholes if I didn’t have any morals.
Counter-balance it by taking the money earned and putting it toward programs to help combat racism, bigotry, and other indifferences.
If one of us beheaded a jesus statue could we generate a similar response?
No and we’d just have all the national media talking about how the left are just a bunch of godless communists that hate America. We have enough of that already :(
this is a hate crime and it’s not being charged as such because our government favors violent christian fundamentalist terrorists
I’m scared he might run for president and actually win.
According to an archived version of his campaign website, Cassidy pushed for a 10-year prison sentence for anyone who destroys a statue in his own state.
I’m sure he expects exactly the same punishment for himself.
This is true Leopards Ate My Face territory.
Not quite lol Leopards Ate My Face is more Turkeys Voting for Christmas, where someone aligns with someone else in spite of the person they’re aligning with clearly not having their interests at heart. Like the vast majority of Trump supporters, or LGBTQ hexbear users supporting Putin.
This is just plain hypocrisy, like “the only moral abortion is my abortion”.
Turkeys Voting For Thanksgiving*
(Christmas isn’t the turkey holiday, FYI. In fact, it’s been a goose, historically.)
In other parts of the world “turkeys voting for Christmas” is a common saying.
Cursory search shows it’s exclusively a UK idiom, to be accurate. So, “other part” singular being a small island where turkeys are not, nor have ever been, indigenous. That tracks.
That’s right, the UK has peacocks in its trees instead of turkeys.
Henry VIII imported them, smartass.
As someone who’s never eaten a goose in his life (though I would happily try it, those rude honking bastards), I’ve had turkey on Christmas Eve at relatives. Though it’s often ham.
I hate it when turkey is ham. Stay in your lane, meat products!
Surely he’s ideologically consistent
/s if anyone really needs that
Seems like a Perfect setup for a judge to sentence him with. It won’t happen, but it should.
Cassidy was arrested and faces vandalism charges, which could carry a one-year prison sentence and a $2,560 fine. He has since been released
Why is he not being charged under Iowa’s hate crime laws?
I would like to see this, although I wonder if the correct answer is that religion is not a protected group. If religion is a protected group, this is a hate crime.
Come now, we both know Christians would just then cry that non-belief isn’t a religion.
In fact, I’m pretty sure I remember hearing that come up in the past… They’re using motivated reasoning. They want a specific outcome, not a set of principles applied.
Sucks for them. They apparently haven’t heard of Title VII of the Civil rights act.
"Religious beliefs include theistic beliefs (i.e. those that include a belief in God) as well as non-theistic “moral or ethical beliefs as to what is right and wrong which are sincerely held with the strength of traditional religious views.”
“Religious observances or practices include, for example, attending worship services, praying, wearing religious garb or symbols, displaying religious objects, adhering to certain dietary rules, proselytizing or other forms of religious expression, or refraining from certain activities.”
Those quotes are from the US customs and border protection website here. Straight from the horses mouth.
It does suck for them, but that’s never stopped them from trying and they even get unconstitutional laws on the books.
The mere fact something is illegal does not stop someone.
Oh for sure, it is scary how they can do mental gymnastics like that. All it really takes is a corrupt judge that follows the Bible more than they follow our laws and constitution to be able to sidestep that, too. Thankfully, most judges do make their decisions based on our laws and constitution.
I understand though what we need to realize is that this isn’t simply “non-belief”. Satanic temple members have strongly held beliefs as part of the core tenants of satanism. It’s a non-superstitious religion. It’s just as valid a religion as christianity or islam.
I agree with you, I’m just pointing out that the Christians are not using logic or reasoning despite using words that might convince you otherwise.
I can’t argue with that.
But it isn’t a non-belief. I wholeheartedly believe they’re wrong.
Hopefully no one will have to tell that to a judge. Religous extremists are a poison.
I don’t know the right answer. Religious persecution is a real thing and has caused the deaths of countless people across the years that humans have existed. BUT Christians aren’t being persecuted in America (at the moment at least) and have an undo influence on the levers of power. I feel like a good thing to do would be to give the IRS teeth and and have individual Churches or Church organizations that violate the terms of their non profit status actually lose it and have to pay taxes on the huge amount of wealth they own (mostly land but I am sure other shit).
Yes, all churches need to pay taxes.
Nuh uh! Churches do charity work so they need to be tax free. — any christian we’ve argued with over this on the internet.
See, the thing about charity work is, it’s tax deductible!
Because Iowa is still under a Christian stranglehold behind the scenes.
Iowa used to be purple, it’s since turned into a red shithole. You got a few bright spots in Des Moines and Iowa city, but the rest of the state is rednecks and meth heads.
but the rest of the state is rednecks and meth heads.
feels true about every state these days…
That’s 'cause it is. There is no such thing as “red states” and “blue states;” there are only states that are a slightly higher percentage rural or slightly higher percentage urban.
Haven’t looked it up, but I’d be shocked if there is a single state where rural outnumbered urban.
I didn’t mean to suggest “outnumbered;” I meant to say that the urban/rural percentages are slightly different between states and that that’s what makes the difference in ideology.
More concretely, it isn’t that Southerners are worse than anybody else; it’s that rural folks everywhere are equally terrible. Urban southerners are just as cosmopolitan as northern ones and rural folks from (for example) Oregon are just as backwards and racist as rural folks from Georgia. The only thing that makes Oregon a “blue state” and Georgia a “red state” is that metropolitan Portland etc. make up a slightly higher percentage of Oregon’s total population than metropolitan Atlanta etc. make up of Georgia’s.
Off the top of my head, I bet Montana fits the bill. Maybe one or both of the Dakotas too
Yep. Otherwise who’s to say a random cross somewhere doesn’t ‘strike a nerve’ precedent of him getting away w it just leads to chaos.
“I saw the cross and it struck a nerve. When I think of those men in those dresses molesting children… I saw red, white, and blue… and I knew I needed to stand up for those children’s freedom from this den of paedophiles”
This is the news story I’m waiting for. If only the people larping as protectors of children knew the call was coming from inside their own house of worship.
There’s at least some who know and don’t really care. They’re just there to feel accepted and popular.
Because those laws only exist to protect christians?
Now imagine for a moment what would happen if someone were to decapitate a statue of Mary or Jesus.
Fox News would talk about it for the next week.
Let try it out? It’s not like it will be hard to find one religious shit are everywhere
If everyone did it across the country, people would flip
But to you who are listening I say: Love your enemies, do good to those who hate you, bless those who curse you, pray for those who mistreat you.
Or, was that behead your enemies?
In their minds, this is loving your enemy. Because Christians are right and everyone else is wrong. So forcing your beliefs on people is a good thing because you’re saving their souls.
This is why slavery was a good thing for Africans.
[/s because 2023]
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2023/07/ron-desantis-florida-slavery-curriculum
edited in the article in case people didn’t know that this is an actual thing GOPs believe
The sarcasm tag was too little too late, DeSantis has made your comment part of the Florida curriculum
I’ll edit my commnet with a link.
Lol I was just joking, it’s ok. I meant your specific comment was added to curriculum, not that they already whitewashed slavery
Love your enemies, sure. But when they put a goat statue in a government building, that’s a bridge too far! As a good Christian, you’ve got a right to defend yourself in life-threatening goat statue situations.
Who knows what it’s up to once you’re not looking at it?!
Are you implying baphomet statues are actually weeping angels?
Well, maybe not the time energy stealing kind but, we can’t be sure they don’t move just because they didn’t when we were looking at them
It’s far more than just a goat statue, have you seen it? It’s dope. I’ve always liked the children at his feet looking up to him lol I’m sure that triggers Christians so hard.
Awww the only words he can read are: enemies, hate, curse, mistreat. Bless his lil heart.
They say they love Jesus but they only talk Old Testament stuff. The Christian far right would have lynched Jesus the second they would have heard of some woke commie bum becoming popular.
Love your enemas?
That’s some commie shit
I think it went something like this, “Then Jesus saith to him: Begone, Satan: for it is written, The Lord thy God shalt thou adore, and him only shalt thou serve.”
Pretty sure there’s an ocean of difference between Jesus Christ rebuking the literal devil and a politician traveling across state borders to illegally deface a statue as a publicity stunt to fundraise and get an interview on Fox about how he totally “decapitated Satan.” Even if his conviction was somehow driven by religion and not pure vanity (it wasn’t), any form of religious supremacy has no place in society at large, let alone a government building. The law recognizes this, “freedom of religion” is the backbone of this in the US, and I’d hope people understand why it might be a worthwhile and important protection to have and uphold.
Additionally, I have a suspicion that anyone who favorably compares a person who postures as a Christian supremacist to Christ is less the sort of person with an understanding of their religion and more the sort of person who knows how to search for the word “Satan” in their YouVersion Bible app.
To this guy’s fans, and possibly him, he did literally rebuke Satan with this act.
There are people out there who actually believe it, and therefore agree his actions legitimately align with Jesus’ teachings.
That’s not Satan, that’s Baphomet.
A bit of demonology (or culture in general) can go a long way in helping these people avoiding this kind of nonsensical responses.
It’s like if someone were to deface a statue of the archangel Michael and I went on a tirade about how evil all the cherubims really were. Michael is an archangel, not a cherubim. Similar but not the same.
Psalm 95:5, “For all the gods of the Gentiles are devils.”
That’s really metal \m/ \m/ \m/ \m/ \m/ \m/ \m/ \m/
Jesus rebuked Satan in the text I quoted.
I was handwaving on the statue itself, as it’s immaterial to my point. You think they have different reactions to baphoment, even if they are aware? They see baph as an agent of Satan, and therefore Satan.
Well, the statue will be more than material when he will be judged by the law.
The most funny thing is that you believe the infernal potentates are all aligned and following a ruler. By definition the hellish powers are independent and individual in their scopes and objectives, Satan fought God exactly because he didn’t recognize its ultimate authority over his own free will. Confusing Satan with Baphomet is like confusing Drumpf and Putin: they both are evil and terrible people supporting one another when their interests collide while also ready to jump at each other throat should the situation require so, but I would never accuse Drumpf of having moved war to Ukraine since it was Putin to do so.
But I don’t see you as a reasonable person so I presume this distinction will fall flat at your feet. Oh well, nothing bad, the guy will still be judged for his actions and will suffer the consequences (hopefully) for his sensless violence. Keep seething in your ignorance good boy
Was this the guy who didn’t even have the decency to put the world’s population in a sack before he drowned them? “Oh he’s changed now”
He is going to send death for both of us too.
“We should be grateful to be able to serve a homicidal maniac, after all, we’re just like him”
Okay, you go first tho. I’m following you, believe me, just jump from the bridge first
How benevolent
Kinda sure that’s not Satan but Baphomet. Completely different characters if you know what you are talking about; which is not your case since your Christian mindset doesn’t allow for the retaining of useful information as it is normal for a sheep mindset
Pretty sure it went something in Ancient Greek and that you’re just parroting an interpretation without any introspection of the source text nor the context from which it was lifted.
Try doing something scholarly next time. Hot-take-Bible-Quotes are worthless.
Oh neat, can I try?
"I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
I will face my fear. I will permit it to pass over me and through me. And when it has gone past, I will turn the inner eye to see its path.
Where the fear has gone there will be nothing. Only I will remain."
– Paul Atreides, Dune - Frank Herbert
Did I do it right? We’re sharing quotes from our favorite fiction books, right?
I’m actually surprised that the satanic temple isn’t pushing for him to be charged with some kind of hate crime. Pretty sure if so decapitated a statue of Jesus it wouldn’t just be destruction of property?
I would love this to happen. For two weeks straight, conservative radio shows, Fox News specials, all talking about the “War on Christianity”.
Don’t you just love political candidates that don’t believe in the first amendment, probably not a fan of the 19th or 13th either.
And technically he fought for the freedom he is now trying to suppress.
I love how these right wing “Christians” have such a selective definition of “freedom”. Thankfully the Satanic Temple keeps shining a spotlight on their hypocrisy.
What about the 21st?
But you don’t understand, he’s all about respecting the establishment of religion but this wasn’t a religion.
But you don’t understand, he’s all about respecting the establishment of religion but this wasn’t a religion.
I can’t tell if this comment is missing a /s or not.
Well Bob, I can’t say I ever miss the /s.
Well Bob, I can’t say I ever miss the /s.
Well, considering that you got the name wrong, your comment doesn’t instill a whole lot of confidence of accuracy.
It is a mangled Office Space quote.
Ah, ok. Loved that movie, but didn’t recognize the quote.
I was going to originally go with “And don’t call me Shirley”, but I thought that might be too esoteric to be recognized in the context of the comment.
I like the word esoteric.
It makes the soles of my feet tingle.
His headshot looks like Jeff playing the dean.
He looks like he couldn’t handle male pattern baldness so he went completely shaven, but he needs the beard or else he’ll look like the freshly shorn scrotum Dr Evil was talking about.
Take off the bald cap.
I AM BALD!!
Lights, camera, DEAN!
I’m completely unsurprised that this was a political stunt. If Trump taught these assholes anything, it’s that the free press (and in turn, the crowd funding/find raising) they get from their virtue signaling demonstrations like this one will help them weather any punishments they may face–if they really face any at all
deleted by creator
He traveled across state lines to commit a hate crime, he should be getting some serious charges not some slap on the wrist BS
Seems like this would be a hate crime. Very un-American behavior from this Republican goon.
No true American. Don’t a significant amount of Americans think and behave like him ergo making it American behavior.
America is a melting pot of people and cultures and religions from all over the world. Republicans don’t like this. They want a Christian Nation.
A significant amount of Americans support a would be dictator who would gladly make himself dictator for life, but that doesn’t make it American behavior.
I think they meant it in reference to the stated ideals. Kind of like how so many of the ardent Christians in this country act in a very “un-Christian” way. Obviously we know the way real Christians act is all over the map, but they can be judged against the ideal of Jesus or his teachings.
American vs un-American isn’t as well defined, but I think it was meant as favoring truth, justice, equality, inclusivity/melting pot, etc. Again NOT an accurate representation of the real population.
I think it should become customary that if a politician advocates for a certain punishment for a crime, and then commits that particular crime, that they receive the punishment they advocated for (within the bounds of current law of course). He wants a 10-year prison sentence for destroying a statue, he should get a 10-year prison sentence for destroying the statue.
This guy hits a nerve for me.
So it’s OK if I destroy him, right?I mean, using his reasoning anyway.
