The funniest line from social media:
“Maybe it’s because we don’t need a computer to automate mansplaining when there’s already an excess supply produced by men,” answers one woman.
The funniest line from social media:
“Maybe it’s because we don’t need a computer to automate mansplaining when there’s already an excess supply produced by men,” answers one woman.
Statistics is such a weird area of math that idk if anything social can be deduced based on them.
What does it tell you exactly about the world that in a sample 550 men used ChatGPT vs 450 women?
There’s a reason for replication crisis in psychology.
If the sample is unbiased then 1000 people is absolutely huge
Big ifs and unbiased in what way? There are detectable and undetectable biases. Physical and mental. It’s god damn pseudoscience outright because there’s no way think of every possible way it can be fricked due to human complexity undetectable by simple questionnaires
The only proper way to approach psychology and psychiatry is to analyse the brain neurons one by one and map it all for each one person. It’s just not possible yet. But it is deterministic, sane than blindly shooting substances and seeing what sticks. Those are primitive early methods akin to bloodletting due to absolute lack of deeper understanding of the brain