Before I put my laptop aside at the restaurant I’m working at, I open a terminal window, enter a single command, and hit enter. The server gives me my breakfast and I push my laptop away as the bot springs to life, opening a Chrome window and navigating to LinkedIn. It starts scrolling through job listings, and opens a few of them.
I watch the bot find a job at a company called Alpha Lion and click “Easy Apply.” It enters my biographical information, generates a resume, and writes a cover letter. It tells Alpha Lion I am authorized to work in the United States, that I do not mind remote work and in fact prefer it, that I have not served in the military. It explains that “I am particularly drawn to Alpha Lion’s commitment to personal excellence and innovation in sports nutrition” and that “I am looking forward to the opportunity to discuss how my skills and experiences align with the goals of Alpha Lion and how I can help propel your video marketing efforts to new heights.” It clicks apply. I take a bite of my toast.
The bot finds another job at a marketing firm and tells them “I thrive on building strong teams and driving innovation through entrepreneurship and emerging technologies. Let’s create the future together!” While texting one of my friends, I watch it tell the jewelry company Brilliant Earth that “Your mission to cultivate a more transparent and sustainable jewelry industry resonates deeply with my professional values, and I am eager to contribute my expertise in developing innovative social media strategies that align with your brand’s vision.”
By the time I finished breakfast, I had applied to 12 different jobs all over the United States.
0:00
/0:50
A sample of what the bot looks like in action. I have cut portions of the application process that included sensitive information like my phone number and address.
This is Auto_Jobs_Applier_AIHawk, which is currently “trending” on GitHub and is one of the most popular new projects there. It is actively being used by thousands of people to use AI to automatically apply for jobs on LinkedIn at scale. It is essentially a Python program that navigates LinkedIn and uses an LLM (OpenAI’s GPT products and Gemini both work) to generate custom cover letters and resumes based on a series of biographical details that a user codes into a script and tweaks them as necessary based on the job description and other information that the company has put on LinkedIn. Various tutorials and guides have been created for how to get the code up and running, which basically just requires users to install Python, tweak some code according to a template, program in an OpenAI API key, and log in to LinkedIn. I was able to get the program running within 15 minutes.
In recent days, AI Hawk has gone viral and has inspired a few clones and forks, including a company called “JobMagic,” whose tagline is “apply for jobs while you sleep” and proposes to essentially be AI Hawk for people who can’t figure out how to get the Python code running.
AI Hawk’s Telegram community has 4,700 members and is full of people who have said they’ve gotten job interviews within days of having the AI submit tons of applications.
“Ran it overnight, applied to around 150 jobs. got an HR call this morning…and i’m just getting started lol. I’m gonna have it run 24/7,” one user wrote. “Planning to apply to thousands of jobs. This time I (the candidate) have the leverage, not some random HR.”
“I’ve been using the platform for a little over three months now, during which I applied to 2,843 roles,” another user wrote. “In that time, I’ve had four interviews, received one offer for a Senior Data Engineer role at £85k, and I’m awaiting feedback on another offer, pending the results of a test.”
“So far for less than 4 weeks, I applied to around 200 jobs,” another said. “Six interviews. It’s really painful being unemployed for monthssss and super difficult to get an interview chance in Bay Area. Before using the bot, got rejected for 2 roles at final round interview recently. One that I spent 2months+ with multiple interviews but still I failed. “
“Applied to 200 jobs so far,” another said. “It’s saved me more than 2 weeks of applications at my previous rate. Wonderful application. Absolutely bonkers helpful.”
“Just started and already 20 applications sent in ~20min,” another said. “The bot will be running all night lol.”
The sudden explosion in popularity of AI Hawk means that we now live in a world where people are using AI-generated resumes and cover letters to automatically apply for jobs, many of which will be reviewed by automated AI software (and where people are sometimes interviewed by AI), creating a bizarre loop where humans have essentially been removed from the job application and hiring process. Essentially, robots are writing cover letters for other robots to read, with uncertain effects for human beings who apply to jobs the old fashioned way.
All of this is very dystopian and continues a race-to-the-bottom where the internet more broadly is flooded with AI-generated drek to the point where navigating anything becomes tedious at best and impossible at worst. But in this case, it is at least possible to understand the instinct to use a bot like this as companies, recruiters, and HR software companies attempt to automate away any possible human interaction you might have with a company as part of the jobs application process. (Some HR companies have even proposed “AI employees,” taking the human job candidate out of the equation altogether.)
It also comes as a response to the longstanding problem of job seekers feeling like applying to and interviewing for jobs can be an endless process, which are often filled with requirements to complete tedious assignments and go through many rounds of interviews spread out over the course of months. Through that lens, it is understandable that people may want to automate the beginning stages of a process that is often a nightmare.
AI Hawk was cofounded by Federico Elia, an Italian computer scientist who told 404 Media that one of the reasons he created the project was to “balance the use of artificial intelligence in the recruitment process” in order to (theoretically) re-level the playing field between companies who use AI HR software and the people who are applying for jobs.
“Many companies employ automated screening systems that are often limited and ineffective, excluding qualified candidates simply because their resumes lack specific keywords. These systems can overlook valuable talent who possess the necessary skills but do not use the right terms in their CVs,” he said. “This approach creates a more balanced ecosystem where AI not only facilitates selection by companies but also supports the candidacy of talent. By automating repetitive tasks and personalizing applications, AIHawk reduces the time and effort required from candidates, increasing their chances of being noticed by employers.”
He said part of his ultimate goal is to “revolutionize the job market through a completely AI-driven job board designed to assist both job seekers and companies in overcoming the inefficiencies and lack of personalization present in traditional recruitment processes.” Essentially, this sounds like he wants to create a place where people are more or less automatically matched with jobs; AI applies for jobs, AI reviews them and a match is made.
I asked him if he is worried about a Dead Internet feedback loop where humans are essentially not involved in the process at all. “I understand the concern, but our goal with AIHawk is to create a synergistic system in which AI enhances the entire recruitment process without creating a vicious cycle,” Elia said. “The AI in AIHawk is designed to improve the efficiency and personalization of applications, while the AI used by companies focuses on selecting the best talent. This complementary approach avoids the creation of a ‘Dead Internet loop’ and instead fosters more targeted and meaningful connections between job seekers and employers.”
Elia said that he personally has already been banned by LinkedIn “due to the use of AI Hawk for automating applications.”
A spokesperson for LinkedIn told 404 Media it was already aware of AI Hawk and that automated tools are not allowed on its platform.
“We remain focused on helping recruiters find quality candidates quickly and jobseekers safely find their next role on LinkedIn while protecting the information people share with us,” the spokesperson said. “As part of this, we don’t permit the use of third party software (such as bots) that scrapes or automates activity on LinkedIn. We invest in technology that limits unauthorized activity so that the vast majority of our applicants are real people and our members’ information stays secure.”
It’s worth mentioning that LinkedIn itself has been implementing AI features into its platform and its job application process. LinkedIn encourages users to talk to its chatbot to help generate strategies for applying to specific jobs, for example. “We’ve invested in new AI tools to help professionals more easily find the right job for them,” the spokesperson said. “For example, our new AI powered job experience for Premium subscribers helps job seekers assess if the role is a fit for them based on their skills and experience, and what to do to stand out.”
The source code of AI Hawk reveals the prompts it uses, and shows how it is designed to fill out applications. Specifically, the AI is tasked with creating “ATS-friendly” resumes and cover letters. ATS is “Applicant Tracking System,” a widely used HR automation tool that reviews resumes and cover letters for specific keywords that match the job description before it is ever seen by a human. There are many guides teaching human beings how to write ATS-friendly resumes, meaning we are already teaching a generation of job seekers how to tailor their cover letters to algorithmic de
So basically LinkedIn says its fine for ourselves and our customers to use AI to screen applicants, but applicants must be forced to toil manually, needlessly, to drive home the idea that applicants time is worth nothing.
Fuck all of this, I would (and do) literally rather live in poverty.
Quite the opposite - LinkedIn will let you use AI to generate cover letters and rewrite your CV, but you have to pay LinkedIn for that privilege. They’re not taking a moral position here, but rather protecting their business.
That is not equivalent to the time saving reduction of an AI that does that, and formats it to all the various kinds of non standard application processes and automatically goes through those processes to apply for you.
Also, most (all?) business policies ultimately stem from and reinforce certain ideological and moral positions, but if you are the fish always swimming in the water, you might not realize the water is even there, or could be different.
It looks like you buffer overflowed, as your post of the news article just cuts off mid word, and various lemmy apps/instances still occasionally have a few bugs connecting replies to correct posts and what not.
“ella” sure sounds like she fed her responses through chatgpt. “vicious cycle of dead internet? no were just trying to create a vicious cycle of dead internet. its very synergistic and efficient, you see.”
Before I put my laptop aside at the restaurant I’m working at, I open a terminal window, enter a single command, and hit enter. The server gives me my breakfast and I push my laptop away as the bot springs to life, opening a Chrome window and navigating to LinkedIn. It starts scrolling through job listings, and opens a few of them.
I watch the bot find a job at a company called Alpha Lion and click “Easy Apply.” It enters my biographical information, generates a resume, and writes a cover letter. It tells Alpha Lion I am authorized to work in the United States, that I do not mind remote work and in fact prefer it, that I have not served in the military. It explains that “I am particularly drawn to Alpha Lion’s commitment to personal excellence and innovation in sports nutrition” and that “I am looking forward to the opportunity to discuss how my skills and experiences align with the goals of Alpha Lion and how I can help propel your video marketing efforts to new heights.” It clicks apply. I take a bite of my toast.
The bot finds another job at a marketing firm and tells them “I thrive on building strong teams and driving innovation through entrepreneurship and emerging technologies. Let’s create the future together!” While texting one of my friends, I watch it tell the jewelry company Brilliant Earth that “Your mission to cultivate a more transparent and sustainable jewelry industry resonates deeply with my professional values, and I am eager to contribute my expertise in developing innovative social media strategies that align with your brand’s vision.”
By the time I finished breakfast, I had applied to 12 different jobs all over the United States. 0:00 /0:50
A sample of what the bot looks like in action. I have cut portions of the application process that included sensitive information like my phone number and address.
This is Auto_Jobs_Applier_AIHawk, which is currently “trending” on GitHub and is one of the most popular new projects there. It is actively being used by thousands of people to use AI to automatically apply for jobs on LinkedIn at scale. It is essentially a Python program that navigates LinkedIn and uses an LLM (OpenAI’s GPT products and Gemini both work) to generate custom cover letters and resumes based on a series of biographical details that a user codes into a script and tweaks them as necessary based on the job description and other information that the company has put on LinkedIn. Various tutorials and guides have been created for how to get the code up and running, which basically just requires users to install Python, tweak some code according to a template, program in an OpenAI API key, and log in to LinkedIn. I was able to get the program running within 15 minutes.
In recent days, AI Hawk has gone viral and has inspired a few clones and forks, including a company called “JobMagic,” whose tagline is “apply for jobs while you sleep” and proposes to essentially be AI Hawk for people who can’t figure out how to get the Python code running.
AI Hawk’s Telegram community has 4,700 members and is full of people who have said they’ve gotten job interviews within days of having the AI submit tons of applications.
“Ran it overnight, applied to around 150 jobs. got an HR call this morning…and i’m just getting started lol. I’m gonna have it run 24/7,” one user wrote. “Planning to apply to thousands of jobs. This time I (the candidate) have the leverage, not some random HR.”
“I’ve been using the platform for a little over three months now, during which I applied to 2,843 roles,” another user wrote. “In that time, I’ve had four interviews, received one offer for a Senior Data Engineer role at £85k, and I’m awaiting feedback on another offer, pending the results of a test.”
“So far for less than 4 weeks, I applied to around 200 jobs,” another said. “Six interviews. It’s really painful being unemployed for monthssss and super difficult to get an interview chance in Bay Area. Before using the bot, got rejected for 2 roles at final round interview recently. One that I spent 2months+ with multiple interviews but still I failed. “
“Applied to 200 jobs so far,” another said. “It’s saved me more than 2 weeks of applications at my previous rate. Wonderful application. Absolutely bonkers helpful.”
“Just started and already 20 applications sent in ~20min,” another said. “The bot will be running all night lol.”
The sudden explosion in popularity of AI Hawk means that we now live in a world where people are using AI-generated resumes and cover letters to automatically apply for jobs, many of which will be reviewed by automated AI software (and where people are sometimes interviewed by AI), creating a bizarre loop where humans have essentially been removed from the job application and hiring process. Essentially, robots are writing cover letters for other robots to read, with uncertain effects for human beings who apply to jobs the old fashioned way.
All of this is very dystopian and continues a race-to-the-bottom where the internet more broadly is flooded with AI-generated drek to the point where navigating anything becomes tedious at best and impossible at worst. But in this case, it is at least possible to understand the instinct to use a bot like this as companies, recruiters, and HR software companies attempt to automate away any possible human interaction you might have with a company as part of the jobs application process. (Some HR companies have even proposed “AI employees,” taking the human job candidate out of the equation altogether.)
It also comes as a response to the longstanding problem of job seekers feeling like applying to and interviewing for jobs can be an endless process, which are often filled with requirements to complete tedious assignments and go through many rounds of interviews spread out over the course of months. Through that lens, it is understandable that people may want to automate the beginning stages of a process that is often a nightmare.
AI Hawk was cofounded by Federico Elia, an Italian computer scientist who told 404 Media that one of the reasons he created the project was to “balance the use of artificial intelligence in the recruitment process” in order to (theoretically) re-level the playing field between companies who use AI HR software and the people who are applying for jobs.
“Many companies employ automated screening systems that are often limited and ineffective, excluding qualified candidates simply because their resumes lack specific keywords. These systems can overlook valuable talent who possess the necessary skills but do not use the right terms in their CVs,” he said. “This approach creates a more balanced ecosystem where AI not only facilitates selection by companies but also supports the candidacy of talent. By automating repetitive tasks and personalizing applications, AIHawk reduces the time and effort required from candidates, increasing their chances of being noticed by employers.”
He said part of his ultimate goal is to “revolutionize the job market through a completely AI-driven job board designed to assist both job seekers and companies in overcoming the inefficiencies and lack of personalization present in traditional recruitment processes.” Essentially, this sounds like he wants to create a place where people are more or less automatically matched with jobs; AI applies for jobs, AI reviews them and a match is made.
I asked him if he is worried about a Dead Internet feedback loop where humans are essentially not involved in the process at all. “I understand the concern, but our goal with AIHawk is to create a synergistic system in which AI enhances the entire recruitment process without creating a vicious cycle,” Elia said. “The AI in AIHawk is designed to improve the efficiency and personalization of applications, while the AI used by companies focuses on selecting the best talent. This complementary approach avoids the creation of a ‘Dead Internet loop’ and instead fosters more targeted and meaningful connections between job seekers and employers.”
Elia said that he personally has already been banned by LinkedIn “due to the use of AI Hawk for automating applications.”
A spokesperson for LinkedIn told 404 Media it was already aware of AI Hawk and that automated tools are not allowed on its platform.
“We remain focused on helping recruiters find quality candidates quickly and jobseekers safely find their next role on LinkedIn while protecting the information people share with us,” the spokesperson said. “As part of this, we don’t permit the use of third party software (such as bots) that scrapes or automates activity on LinkedIn. We invest in technology that limits unauthorized activity so that the vast majority of our applicants are real people and our members’ information stays secure.”
It’s worth mentioning that LinkedIn itself has been implementing AI features into its platform and its job application process. LinkedIn encourages users to talk to its chatbot to help generate strategies for applying to specific jobs, for example. “We’ve invested in new AI tools to help professionals more easily find the right job for them,” the spokesperson said. “For example, our new AI powered job experience for Premium subscribers helps job seekers assess if the role is a fit for them based on their skills and experience, and what to do to stand out.”
The source code of AI Hawk reveals the prompts it uses, and shows how it is designed to fill out applications. Specifically, the AI is tasked with creating “ATS-friendly” resumes and cover letters. ATS is “Applicant Tracking System,” a widely used HR automation tool that reviews resumes and cover letters for specific keywords that match the job description before it is ever seen by a human. There are many guides teaching human beings how to write ATS-friendly resumes, meaning we are already teaching a generation of job seekers how to tailor their cover letters to algorithmic de
So basically LinkedIn says its fine for ourselves and our customers to use AI to screen applicants, but applicants must be forced to toil manually, needlessly, to drive home the idea that applicants time is worth nothing.
Fuck all of this, I would (and do) literally rather live in poverty.
Quite the opposite - LinkedIn will let you use AI to generate cover letters and rewrite your CV, but you have to pay LinkedIn for that privilege. They’re not taking a moral position here, but rather protecting their business.
That is not equivalent to the time saving reduction of an AI that does that, and formats it to all the various kinds of non standard application processes and automatically goes through those processes to apply for you.
Also, most (all?) business policies ultimately stem from and reinforce certain ideological and moral positions, but if you are the fish always swimming in the water, you might not realize the water is even there, or could be different.
I thought someone hacked my account I didn’t recognize the post lol.
And yes, every single part of job searching is bad for the job seekers because any product is going to be marketed towards the HR department.
It looks like you buffer overflowed, as your post of the news article just cuts off mid word, and various lemmy apps/instances still occasionally have a few bugs connecting replies to correct posts and what not.
Yeah, Frick. Or rather the buffer didn’t overflow. Can you charafter count it for me?
Edit: seems to be around 10163 characters, as copied from my post from the Lemmy web interface. Kind of an arbitrary number.
Most of it’s there anyway.
“ella” sure sounds like she fed her responses through chatgpt. “vicious cycle of dead internet? no were just trying to create a vicious cycle of dead internet. its very synergistic and efficient, you see.”
Thanks!