Recently, I saw a post on Lemmy of an article that piqued my interest, at least enough to try to validate the information in it. When I followed the link, I was greeted with a clearly AI generated image (it showed trump with an extra finger).
I immediately lost trust in the article and made a comment regarding that. (Link)
But the reaction to this was surprising to me. I got a response stating that the author has a background of being an established writer and reporter, as well as received a lot of downvotes. However, no one responded to my points on the use of AI.
My thoughts are that if you are making money on something, then you need to avoid AI when possible and reasonable.
What’s going on here? Am I wrong and this is somehow an acceptable use of AI?
[Edit] side note of something that that just occurred to me: don’t go to that thread to manipulate the votes or start ““brigading”” against it for the AI. I just wanted to discuss it here. Thanks.
Yes, but agreeing with your perspective, I can’t see your perspective. Logic.
(Your perspective wasn’t the problem, you doing it by being condescending was the problem.)
Welp, I still don’t see what’s condescending about my comment — I guess I should have put a big ol’ winky emoji at the end to signal my intended tone. As should be clear I was triggered by your escalating response to that 🤷
TBH, I’m still fairly sure you’re just playing an idiot game of oneupmanship here, but for what it’s worth I didn’t mean to talk down to you.
No, I’m just an idiot. And I wish people would realize that.
Also, again, I am agreeing with you, so how is it one-upsmanship?
(So often on Lemmy I find people who just won’t accept that I agree with them when I say I do and I just don’t get it.)