• Vince
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hmm, makes me wonder if a big factor is that it reads the first couple of results and summarizes it. Like if it was turned off, people wouldn’t bother clicking through and reading, so they just leave and and “fact” get saved in their brains. If they were really motivated, they would click through and read and come to the same incorrect conclusions but most don’t bother so the misinformation doesn’t propagate as easily

    • vrek@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      This was always a thing. The results on page 1 had a much greater click rate than on page 2+

      • Jtotheb
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        That used to be a direct result of how good the search was. In the aughts it was generally on page 1 or you had to rephrase your query; the remaining results were the era’s equivalent of ‘slop’, link trees and redirect rabbit holes and plaintext sites with random stolen content. I was met with genuine surprise any time I found what I was looking for on page 3 or 4