Sorry, this is not the source. May I ask why do you share misinformation?
Not only the article is an entirely different case, has no such chart, but the “clickable links” on the website are fake, too:
They’re complaining that the way “Source” in the image is highlighted implies it’s a clickable link, which of course it’s not.
Despite that, whether the links in the text are highlighted depends on the browser (which is odd). Using Firefox Focus they are invisible but are highlighted in my stock Andoid browser.
In Addition, the data in the text is global data, the data in the post is US only, so it’s not the source of the data of the post.
You missed the part about wp-image-4776.lazyautosizes.lazyloaded. This is a critical part of the lore, because it means the author of that page used WordPress, and is lazy.
Sorry, this is not the source. May I ask why do you share misinformation?
Not only the article is an entirely different case, has no such chart, but the “clickable links” on the website are fake, too:
I clicked all links. None of them are fake. So, what the shit are you talking about?
That is the original source I know. The content describes the content of the graph. Where is this misinformation? What did I miss?
They’re complaining that the way “Source” in the image is highlighted implies it’s a clickable link, which of course it’s not.
Despite that, whether the links in the text are highlighted depends on the browser (which is odd). Using Firefox Focus they are invisible but are highlighted in my stock Andoid browser.
In Addition, the data in the text is global data, the data in the post is US only, so it’s not the source of the data of the post.
You missed the part about wp-image-4776.lazyautosizes.lazyloaded. This is a critical part of the lore, because it means the author of that page used WordPress, and is lazy.