@[email protected] to [email protected] • 8 months agoRulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square376fedilinkarrow-up1952arrow-down120
arrow-up1932arrow-down1imageRulesh.itjust.works@[email protected] to [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square376fedilink
minus-square@Madison420link1•8 months agoYou’ve literally argued that I’m seeing about the idiom for well over a dozen comments. Your memory is apparently quite short.
minus-square@Madison420link1•8 months agohttps://douchebag.com/ I can provide links that don’t change the substance of the argument as well.
minus-square@Madison420link1•8 months agoI do, I also know it doesn’t actually change what you’ve said. You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was, adding /s doesn’t change that.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink1•8 months ago You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was That’s not what the comment you linked sad. I didn’t say anything about the idiom itself.
minus-square@Madison420link1•8 months agoIt didn’t say anything no, it implied I’m wrong and your translation is correct. It’s that not the content of your comment?
You’ve literally argued that I’m seeing about the idiom for well over a dozen comments. Your memory is apparently quite short.
Where? Show me a comment/quote.
Need more boo boo?
https://feddit.de/comment/4681048
https://toneindicators.carrd.co/#masterlist
https://douchebag.com/
I can provide links that don’t change the substance of the argument as well.
Do you know what “sarcasm” is?
I do, I also know it doesn’t actually change what you’ve said.
You say the idiom is not what the author themselves says it was, adding /s doesn’t change that.
That’s not what the comment you linked sad. I didn’t say anything about the idiom itself.
It didn’t say anything no, it implied I’m wrong and your translation is correct. It’s that not the content of your comment?