• @fubo
    link
    1469 months ago

    They complain about political correctness, and they go and do shit like this.

    • @CosmicTurtle
      link
      English
      45
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Political correctness: I can’t say what I want!

      Conservatives Later: it’s now illegal for you to say what you want

  • arthurpizza
    link
    English
    1069 months ago

    This is a blatant first amendment violation. Another pro-gamer move from the free speech party.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      59 months ago

      Devils advocate here, in some places, deliberately using the wrong pronouns with the intention to harm someone would be hate speech.

      So flip it around, using the preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child and/or their shitty parents.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        439 months ago

        Hate speech is protected by the First Amendment, so flip it around, inclusive speech is also protected by the First Amendment. I’m sure teachers can lose their jobs for hate speech but people cannot be criminally charged for hate speech alone. Prosecuting teachers as sex offenders for using pronouns is a clear and deliberate violation of their Constitutional rights.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            119 months ago

            Hate crimes and hate speech are two different, but related, things, so I understand your confusion. You cannot be prosecuted for hate speech, because that is a government infringement on your liberties. They can prosecute you if the hate speech intentionally incites violence, because that is not protected speech. The hate speech can also inform intent to turn another crime into a hate crime.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            59 months ago

            Also, hate speech is still separate from threatening violence or other harm. I can freely hate you, but I can’t advocate to hurt you.

            I think I have that right.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            49 months ago

            Calling someone the N word (hate speech) won’t get you arrested.

            Calling someone the N word while you attack them (hate crime) will.

            Under this context, yes you would be prosecuted for “hate speech” because the criminal activity here is the speech itself. Under any other circumstances you would be allowed to say whatever you like. There are always consequences to your actions, they’re just not always criminal consequences.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -19 months ago

              Calling someone the nword is almost always going to make them feel unsafe, which makes it an assault, am I right?

              • Urist
                link
                fedilink
                29 months ago

                Making someone feel unsafe is not assault. Words can compel people to act but they themselves are responsible for their actions.

                That being said, there is a concept of fighting words in the USA. Scroll down to the section titled Post-Chaplinsky, there’s information about the courts’ rulings applying to personal insults.

                Honestly I need to take time to read this wikipedia article a little more thoroughly but I’m on my way out the door. I am not a lawyer I just find law interesting.

      • arthurpizza
        link
        English
        179 months ago

        preferred pronouns is considered an attack on the child

        If the child doesn’t want to be called that it’s not their preferred pronoun.

  • @Burn_The_Right
    link
    1069 months ago

    There is no “good conservative” alive today.

    • @Bonesince1997
      link
      499 months ago

      When the flip flopper in chief, Mitt Romney, is your only hope, or anyone named Cheney, we’ve got massive problems.

      • Beemo Dinosaurierfuß
        link
        fedilink
        329 months ago

        Not that I disagree with you.

        But even as a staunch Euro leftist, I think it is okay that there are people I strongly disagree with, even strongly dislike because I think the fight for values that are against my personal morality.

        Both Romney and Cheney are such people.
        I don’t think they should have political power over other people.

        But they share at least a certain common ground with me that the fascists don’t.
        And for how little I actually like those people, I still value this very difference.

        • RedSeries
          link
          English
          29 months ago

          deleted by creator

  • @elbucho
    link
    929 months ago

    I really can’t comprehend the level of hate that these motherfuckers must possess to write or support such a bill. I mean, let’s say you’re an incredible asshole who doesn’t think that trans people exist, like you think that you know who they are much better than they actually know themselves. Even with that as a baseline, isn’t it still just the polite thing to treat them with basic respect?

    If I found out that someone I just met preferred to use their middle name instead of their first name, I would 100% use that person’s middle name when addressing them. It’s just common courtesy. The same thing goes with a person who’s transitioning - I will use their preferred name, because I’m not a completely deplorable piece of shit.

    But this guy is way worse than someone who intentionally antagonizes people by using their disliked name when addressing them. This guy wants to actively punish anybody who has the rock bottom bare minimum of civility by destroying their lives and livelihoods.

    I just can’t grasp that level of hatred. How is it that this piece of shit shares enough genes with everybody else that he’s recognized as human?

    • chingadera
      link
      29 months ago

      I think your 3rd paragraph is off, just a heads up

        • chingadera
          link
          129 months ago

          You know what, it took me having to quote your words to read them correctly, my bad and well said.

          • @elbucho
            link
            7
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            In the immortal words of Romeo: “It’s all gravy”, baby.

  • RubberDuck
    link
    81
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ah yes, further diluting the term sex offender down to the point the label is meaningless.

    Makes perfect sense to combine teachers who accept pronouns, with people caught publicly urinating on the same list with violent rapists and convicted pedophiles… after all, it’s all the same.

    • @Clent
      link
      429 months ago

      The right is full of pedophiles and rapists so this works for them.

      • @LifeInMultipleChoice
        link
        49 months ago

        Yeah but they are afraid of everything, so they have to make sure they are rapinga child of the sex that won’t get them labeled as gay. Ye ole Republican mantra, rape is okay so long as it’s not gay.

        • @Gabu
          link
          39 months ago

          You wish they were this coherent. Just like the homophobic rightwinger scum in Hungary, which was caught in a huge gay orgy, they will gladly posture one thing in public then do another in private.

    • @Pwnmode
      link
      269 months ago

      Ditto. But I’m in the USA myself.

      • @SendMePhotos
        link
        99 months ago

        It’s difficult to differentiate between real news and The Onion now days. It’s like… Comical but also terrifying.

  • @carl_dungeon
    link
    English
    599 months ago

    Jesus Christ fuck these GOP assholes so hard

    • Final Remix
      link
      59 months ago

      They probably want that, so no.

  • @EdibleFriend
    link
    579 months ago

    HAIRCUTS! HAIRCUTS OF THE WRONG GENDER ARE PART OF THIS BILL!!

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    429 months ago

    As a practical result this is more of an attack on education than an attack on LGBT, who would want to be a teacher under such tyrannical rules?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    409 months ago

    How is anyone supposed to know anyone else’s pronouns without asking them?

    Are the teachers supposed to check the genitals of their students at the beginning of the year?

    • @fox2263
      link
      English
      429 months ago

      I feel like that’s what the right wants. They’re weirdly interested in that

    • RubberDuck
      link
      89 months ago

      Naked lessons… naked schools… that way the sneaky trans kids also cannot change during the year.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        89 months ago

        But if everyone is naked, the poor boys will be distracted. I mean, they already veer off course when shoulders are out. I guess the only appropriate solution is to not have the girls at (naked) school. /s

        • RubberDuck
          link
          69 months ago

          Oh excellent point. All naked boys only and girls only schools. That will definitely resolve the issue and has no chance to backfire.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            49 months ago

            Any gay people 🤮 will be in conversion camps far away from our darling children. So no problems there. /s

    • @mightyfoolish
      link
      19 months ago

      If you never speak about that individual, you won’t need to know their pronouns. If they quit the backbiting and remembered the golden rule, they wouldn’t need to “use pronouns” but then they wouldn’t even be Republicans anymore.

      These politicians love to create “problems to solve” instead of finding solutions to real problems we have.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Lesson learned always use the wrong pronouns randomly so you don’t have to worry about it, who cares. Let’s everyone get together try to love one another right now!

        Or just avoid using pronouns altogether lol, I believe they works for any pronoun

        They their they’re

        Our your we us them

        • @mightyfoolish
          link
          19 months ago

          I don’t think you understood what I meant. Let’s say Roger now identifies as a woman (but still kept the name Roger). If I never talked about to you about Roger, I wouldn’t have to use any pronouns at all because he and she are mostly used in the third person.

  • @nutsack
    link
    39
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    study to be a teacher in Missouri
    teach full time for $30,000/year or something
    become a sex offender, obviously can’t teach anymore
    can’t actually find a job at all
    forced to live in a designated trailer park for pedophiles
    become a lifelong welfare recipient

    nice one, conservatives

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      Dumbass bills are introduced all the time. The news likes to bring them up but never talks about most of them being shot down though.

  • @ArtVandelay
    link
    English
    339 months ago

    Don’t like your teacher? Just flip your pronouns real quick and get them on the sex offender list. Problem solved.

    Fuck this bullshit

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -14
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      What do you mean? Would a kid lie about their sex? Why mental health issues? Abuse? Clout? Trolling? What about if they are just confused? They would not become sex offenders or found guilty of anything for a honest mistake

    • @mightyfoolish
      link
      20
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Most of them already are… but I get your point.

  • @EvilEyedPanda
    link
    269 months ago

    I hate that these are usually rage bait titles, but this is legitimately terrifying