• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    989 months ago

    yeah because I have a real job (retail) not whispering to the lightning through the haunted frame like yall

    • Lux
      link
      fedilink
      419 months ago

      Damn apparently you’re a poet too

    • @Etterra
      link
      69 months ago

      Working in a shop is a skill as old as civilization.

  • @uservoid1
    link
    English
    779 months ago

    I (programmer and team leader) get requests from the king (management and project manager) and pass them to the peasants (code monkeys), clean after their shit (QA and code review). I get peanuts in return while the king keep most of the loot.

    • Ghostalmedia
      link
      English
      399 months ago

      Bob: “why can’t the king just ask the peasants directly?”

      • @mipadaitu
        link
        English
        299 months ago

        I’M A PEOPLE PERSON!!!

        • @kautau
          link
          109 months ago

          I’M A PEASANT PERSON, WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH YOU NOBLES, WHY CAN’T YOU UNDERSTAND THAT

      • @uservoid1
        link
        English
        59 months ago

        It all depends on the project and the team. On some, you work with and along the PM and all is good, and other times you get dictated unconnected requests that you need to fight or ignore.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            39 months ago

            Lucky, my first 2 dev jobs had PMs that were right out of college business majors with zero web development experience. They were just direct unfiltered conduits between the clients and devs, but with a layer of telephone game and almost no ability to day no to the clients.

            It was a fucking nightmare. By the time I did get a good PM, I was pretty much burned out and started my own consultancy (since I’d been managing a small team and doing both dev and PM’s job by then anyway).

    • @grue
      link
      English
      59 months ago

      Ah, so you’re the grand vizier court jester.

      • @uservoid1
        link
        English
        89 months ago

        That definitely define my everyday job experience.

    • Dandroid
      link
      fedilink
      29 months ago

      I get peanuts in return while the king keep most of the loot.

      Well, at least this part hasn’t changed.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      269 months ago

      I’d avoid magic on that one, since modern ideas about how magic works are pretty influenced by technology now. I suspect this would be gibberish to them.

      How about “we have machines so complicated that it’s hard to set them, and my job is to try to change the settings on them and usually fail”?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I was wondering about that too. I think they had adjustable tools in common use, but I could be wrong. They might have also used a different word when changing the depth “setting” of their horse-drawn plow, although “to set” has got to be a pretty old verb.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        49 months ago

        Even better: “our clocks in the future are very complex and it’s my job to keep them working”.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          That would be more a like a sysadmin, though. OP has to introduce new functionality, which I’d want to emphasise.

          They could say they’re a creator of automata, and the past people would picture basically robots, but that implies a more physical type of building, and also that they create things that are purely decorative or for entertainment.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        29 months ago

        We got this sand and tought it to do math. I give the math sand very specific instructions to do a task. There are many people like me, and a good chunk of them are giving the sand instructions to show silly cat pictures.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          I wonder if it would be better to go with sand, or a new metal, given that the average person in 1700 would know the process of smelting ore better than most of the people here. Either way they’re not going to see the point without some explanation, because they’d think it’s easy enough just to draw a cat yourself.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Yeah, something like “We have machines with thousands of switches that can do complicated things depending on how you set the switches. My job is flipping those switches so the machine performs the desired task as best as possible”…?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          I was trying to figure out a way to describe the interface to 1700’s people, given that all the machines they have require very up-close manipulation of the mechanisms to alter. My best guess is as a table covered in triggers like on a crossbow, but that reset themselves. You can tell what they’re doing with a sort of scroll that comes out with stamps on it. That’s still more like a 1970’s dumb terminal than a laptop, but I don’t want to try and describe screens or cursors before I can make sure they understand the concept that not all machines have to be mechanical, which I don’t think would be clear to them automatically.

          I’m guessing at that point it sounds weird and alienating to them, and they might actually think their job as a peasant seems less depressing, especially if I bring up punctuality requirements compared to the 1700’s, where meetings would wait days for someone. White-collar work is better once you can understand what’s happening abstractly, or at least is for me, but no hard deadlines for anything does indeed sound great. They also may have gotten winters off, depending on latitude.

        • @agent_flounder
          link
          English
          19 months ago

          “what is this ‘switch’ of which thou speakest?”

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        I’d go by ‘mechanical devices’, there were hardly any machines in our understanding back then.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Well, they did have clocks, even some early portable ones, and “automata” which were a bit like modern animatronics. Power applications like mills, too. I don’t know what word would work best, though.

          I’m guessing they’d picture OP running around a giant room filled with clockwork, going at things with a pry bar and wedges. That is a bit like how computers worked in their first decade, albeit electrically rather than mechanically. Later in the 18th century they invented the punchcard loom, so that would be a good point of reference, but we’re all the way back in 1700.

          • Jojo
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Worth noting that the 1700s are, in fact, the 18th century. The first century was the years from 1-100, the second century from 101-200, etc.

            But, yes. It was invented later in the 18th century than our audience came from.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              1
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Also a good point. It’s dumb that we’ve zero-indexed centuries and then given them one-indexed names, but that is the standard.

              • Jojo
                link
                fedilink
                29 months ago

                Well, it’s just how math and numbers in English work.

                Cardinal numbers, the number of things you have, start with zero because you can have none of something (or less with negatives, but that’s neither here nor there).

                Original numbers, Numbers that show which things were in what order (first, second, etc) start at one, because you can’t really have a zeroth something because then it would really be the first one.

                So year 1 is 1 because it’s the first year, and it starts the first century. It would have been entirely possible for English to make the names a little nicer, but given that it isn’t, the math means the first set of one hundred years are the years before the one-hundredth year and cetera.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  I mean, zeroth would still be zeroth; it’s just based on the cardinal the moment before it arrived rather than after, assuming you start with nothing and add objects. Unfortunately that’s not conventional, probably in any language, and so you get a situation where a positional notation clashes with how we want to talk about the larger divisions of it casually. This sort of thing is exactly why computer science does use zero indexing.

                  Relatedly, there was also no year 0; it goes straight from 1 BC to 1 AD.

        • Jojo
          link
          fedilink
          19 months ago

          It is a thinking engine. No further questions.

    • @grue
      link
      English
      89 months ago

      Folks in 1700 understood what an engineer was. I’d just tell them I design really complicated looms.

    • @PostProcess
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      That’s the point they burn you at the stake for being a witch.

      • @kautau
        link
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Well, if they weigh the same as a duck

  • ConditionOverload
    link
    English
    499 months ago

    I’m a chemist, so I’d just tell them that I’m an alchemist.

      • noughtnaut
        link
        17
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        ah uh ah

        So close, yet so very wrong.

    • @then_three_more
      link
      109 months ago

      Apothecary might be better.

      To be honest you might get away with moving the term chemistry forward a couple of decades

      Beginning around 1720, a rigid distinction began to be drawn for the first time between “alchemy” and “chemistry”.[104][105] By the 1740s, “alchemy” was now restricted to the realm of gold making, leading to the popular belief that alchemists were charlatans, and the tradition itself nothing more than a fraud.[102][105]

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alchemy

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    439 months ago

    My career hasn’t changed much since the 1700s, I’m a winemaker. Our company doesn’t have a vineyard we buy grapes from farmers, so our winery is in the city not some villa on the hill. At first glance our warehouse full of barrels is pretty similar to an old school winery. I could show my counterpart advances we have made in automation, like our bottling line or the giant industrial press, and I bet they’d get a kick out of moving stacks of barrels or fermentation tanks with a forklift. Using food grade plastic instead of wood makes cleaning easier, and our pump is electric not hand driven, but ultimately little has changed. Our wine lab is pretty high tech and probably the main exception, I dont think they tested for things like acidity and sulfur levels until the industrial revolution. I was literally just talking about this yesterday with my coworker. We had the bottling line out in the yard and we were sanitizing it by pumping boiling water through it with a diesel powered compressor. My contemporary may not understand sanitizing, or the equipment we used to do it, but he would easily understand the bottler and the importance of keeping it clean. I would love to share a few bottles of modern wine with a pre industrial master and vice versa.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      149 months ago

      i bet they’d get a kick out of moving stacks of barrels or fermentation tanks with a forklift.

      Yeah, that would be really impressive!

        • @Late2TheParty
          link
          29 months ago

          That’s witchcraft you’re talking about! Burn them! 😁

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            Medicine might sound a bit too good to be true, yeah, and this was indeed the end of the witch hunting period. Forklifts might be easier to understand, if really awesome, seeing as they had long had foot-powered cranes for really big projects like cathedrals.

        • @PostProcess
          link
          English
          69 months ago

          Please tell me it’s not Opentext…

          • @PhantomPhanatic
            link
            English
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Exceed is still the only program that handles graphically intense Unix X11 sessions properly for Windows machines. It’s still not great though.

            Some of us still have to slog through old CAD applications that have long been abandoned.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Im gonna guess, is that a job where you advise a company on how to organize, store, and use “enterprise content” (im gonna guess that’s like internal materials like training stuff, internal tools/software)

        • Dandroid
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I’m thinking of the episode of That '70s Show where Kelso’s dad is trying to explain to Kelso what he does for a homework assignment.

          Kelso: “OK, let’s get started. Question number one, what’s your job?”

          John: “I’m a senior executive statistical analysis technician.”

          Kelso: “You’re a senior execu… what?”

          John: “Well, in plain English, I concatenate the verse statistical information to maximize the potential utilization of data.”

          Kelso: “So you give people data!”

          ( Kelso is on the verge of writing it down. )

          John: “A lot of people think that. No. My job’s not about output, it’s about throughput.”

          Kelso: “So you throughput data!”

          John: “Well, now you’ve lost me, son. Oh, listen Michael, you know the eight tracks you love so much?”

          Kelso: “You make them!”

          John: “No, but because of us, other people who make them are able to make them better.”

          Kelso: “So, you fix stuff!”

          John: “You could say that…”

          ( Kelso starts writing. )

          John: “But I wouldn’t.”

          ( Kelso erases it with frustration. )

          And then it keeps going on the like for a while.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            19 months ago

            My job is to leverage the core competencies of my employer into win win scenarios by proactively and synergistically reengineering document based processes. I hope that clears it up.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    359 months ago

    If someone working in semiconductor manufacturing were to answer this question they would probably have to say “I make sand think” and just walk away.

  • @TOModera
    link
    309 months ago

    Merchants have become so powerful that I, a serf, have been taught number solely to account for every penny they make. For this, I’m allowed to live an okay life. I do it with magic (Excel) because they are so big and don’t want to hire many of me. They still act like the Dutch and East India Companies, with slightly fewer atrocities.

  • @ben_dover
    link
    309 months ago

    i’m teaching silicon rocks how to think

  • @ObsidianZed
    link
    289 months ago

    I barely try to explain my job to people today, particularly family.

  • @dingus
    link
    English
    28
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    I think my job would be understandable at a basic level. My job involves healthcare, which has massively changed since the 1700s, but the basics are still there and would likely make sense to people.

    I look at organs to find and document disease.

      • @7u5k3n
        link
        119 months ago

        Let’s toss them in a lake! If they die they weren’t a witch! If they don’t… We then know they are a witch!

        Either way… Huzzah!

      • @dingus
        link
        English
        3
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Close! But I don’t have big enough brains or the paycheck to match lol. You could think of me as a glorified human butcher…far more crude than a surgeon. The pathologist gets the end result after all the blood and guts are out of the way haha. (Unless you’re a forensic pathologist…they slug around in guts all day!)

        • Bibliotectress
          link
          29 months ago

          How do you get into that line of work??? Not because I want to, just morbid curiosity. I’m too squeamish.

          • @dingus
            link
            English
            3
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Haha. Believe me I actually used to be very squeamish as a child. I still am as an adult with certain things…I nope the hell out of there for human vomit (altho it weirdly doesn’t really bother me with dogs and cats).

            Dunno how it went away…I guess just slowly over time as you get exposed to more and more things. Plus I work in an incredibly well ventilated space, which cuts the grossness factor of any of it down by like 95%. You’d be surprised at how much smell influences your idea of “gross”, at least for me. And then if I am a bit grossed out by something, I can freely comment on it and laugh about it with my coworkers because I don’t have to worry about sparing a patient’s feelings…I only get the organ. I had a brief period of time in school where I had autopsy training…man I could NOT stand the smell and I almost threw up before because I tried to toughen it up and breathe through my nose. Big mistake! Idk how anyone can get used to smells like that. Mouth breathing only for me in that environment.

            Anyway, my role is played by different people with different educational backgrounds depending on what country/region you’re in. Here in the US, my job requires a 4 year bachelor’s degree in basically any field… doesn’t really matter as long as you take basic science classes. From there, you enter a specialized 2 year master’s degree program. It’s similar to physician assistant school except we are paid a bit less (but with the advantage of not having to see patients). Our first year is book learning and our second year is hands on training on how to perform the job.

            I was always interested in medical things, but I always hated having to interact with patients. This also allows me to work with my hands and see first hand the actual effects of disease. Cancer is no longer some mysterious, nebulous concept. I can see it with my own two eyes and feel it with my hands. Plus the paycheck is pretty stellar imo…not a doctor salary or anything, but I’m living comfortable as a single adult.

            If it at all seems interesting, I’d encourage you to try to investigate more. I am generally hesitant to say my exact job title in public for fear of being doxxed (it’s a small field), but I’m always happy to share more with anyone over a DM.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              39 months ago

              Just wanted to say that I found the description of your job really interesting, so thanks for taking the time to write about it.

              There’s absolutely no way that I could do it - I’m far too squeamish. But I’m glad that there are people who can do a job like this, which increases mankind’s understanding of diseases.

              • @dingus
                link
                English
                39 months ago

                Hey thanks haha

            • Bibliotectress
              link
              29 months ago

              That was super fascinating! Thank you so much for taking the time to explain!

      • @Moghul
        link
        199 months ago

        "Some other guys figured out how to trick rocks into doing stuff by putting lightning into them

        I just write to the rocks instructions for how to do some work. I get paid for doing that."

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    259 months ago

    Our customers are people who work on (redacted for privacy)

    We help them keep track of if their work is on schedule.

    Pause to explain the Internet here.

    "The Internet is complicated. But imagine you’re holding a long string and I’m holding the other end. If I pull on the string, you’ll feel it. We could then have an agreed upon code like one hard tug is yes, two short tugs is no. Maybe certain patterns form letters , so we can spell words out for each other. Now we can communicate from pretty far away.

    Now imagine if instead of me holding the string, it’s connected to a machine. Maybe that machine moves chalk over a chalkboard based on how you pull on your end of the string. I can then read this chalkboard at my leisure.

    The Internet is much more complicated than that, but for my job that’s close enough. It’s a way to send information from here to there without anyone actually going there in person and telling someone.

    My job is to work on the chalk machine. I help make sure it is set up right so it doesn’t fall over, and the code stuff like ‘one short tug is a, two is b, etc’ is agreed on and interpreted correctly"

    Backend developer.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    239 months ago

    I try to make rocks think with electricity and then cry when it doesn’t think the way I want it to (software engineer)