• Echo Dot
      link
      fedilink
      1626 days ago

      Also ginger.

      And technically wormwood too, although that’s more you drinking water that is soaked into wood.

      • @die444die
        link
        English
        2226 days ago

        Ginger is a root, maybe you’re thinking of something else?

        • credit crazy
          link
          126 days ago

          Eh what is a root if not wood that is covered in dirt

          • @die444die
            link
            English
            1826 days ago

            So is a potato wood? A carrot?

            Ginger is not a tree. It’s a flowering plant.

            • Echo Dot
              link
              fedilink
              -226 days ago

              A potato is not a flowering plant it’s a tuba, such as an onion. Totally different thing entirely to a bit of wood attached to a tree.

              • @die444die
                link
                English
                926 days ago

                And potato is a tuber but an onion is not. Both are flowering plants. So is ginger.

                Ginger has nothing to do with ‘a bit of wood attached to a tree’ which is exactly my point.

              • AnIndefiniteArticle
                link
                fedilink
                726 days ago

                Potato plants absolutely have flowers. Have you ever grown one? Be careful with the potato flowers and fruits. They are poisonous nightshade.

          • @die444die
            link
            English
            1226 days ago

            No, ginger is not a tree.

      • A Phlaming Phoenix
        link
        fedilink
        1126 days ago

        I stand corrected on that one. I assumed it was sumac bark, and you know what they say about assumption. It makes an ass out of u and mption.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        225 days ago

        The bit about powdered sumac (bark?) being a powerful dye for marble is pretty interesting. I wish there was an example photo.

  • @Willdrick
    link
    5526 days ago

    That’s what whiskey is for

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      And smoking anything, it’s definitely part of food as a taste just not the wood it self as an ingredient.

      • @nomous
        link
        326 days ago

        Being used to make the fire/smoke that cooks the food is a really good point, wood is definitely food adjacent even if it’s not strictly edible.

    • @hperrinOP
      link
      17
      edit-2
      26 days ago

      We burn different kinds of wood under our food to make it taste like that wood. Mesquite, apple, hickory, all come to mind. Wood smells really good.

    • @Illuminostro
      link
      1426 days ago

      Maple smells like sugar when cut. Maple syrup used to be made of the sap.

        • @stangel
          link
          5426 days ago

          It still is, but it used to, too.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2026 days ago

          Only the expensive luxury stuff. The kind sold in tourist traps. Most maple syrup sold in stores is flavored corn syrup, which keeps the price down.

          • @WR5
            link
            3326 days ago

            I think at that point it’s called “corn syrup” or just “syrup”. Maple syrup is still made from maple.

            • @elephantium
              link
              English
              326 days ago

              I think this might be a Kleenix vs. tissues type thing for some people. All syrup gets called “maple syrup” regardless of provenance? Then “real maple syrup” vs. “the fake stuff” makes a bit more sense.

              Damn, now I want pancakes…

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -1226 days ago

              At least in the US, most “maple syrup” is literally maple flavored corn syrup or sometimes a blend but is just called Maple Syrup on the front of the bottle. Sometimes it’s called “pancake syrup” for legal reasons

              • @I_Has_A_Hat
                link
                23
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                Pretty sure the fake stuff has to call themselves maple-flavored syrup, pancake syrup, or just syrup, and only the real stuff is called “maple syrup”

              • @Bertuccio
                link
                1
                edit-2
                26 days ago

                No idea why you’ve got any downvotes.

                This is very true. You have to search for actual maple syrup in the US.

                EDIT: Yeah. I know how to find actual maple syrup, folks. There was a time long ago when products actually looked like what you were buying and weren’t all imitation crap. There was no such thing as corn-syrup labeled “breakfast syrup” or “maple-flavored syrup” or “Real syrup” in giant bold text and “with maple flavor” in tiny font somewhere distant.

                Stop defending deceptive product labeling.

                • Ben Hur Horse Race
                  link
                  fedilink
                  1926 days ago

                  he’s getting downvoted cause what he said isn’t true.

                  If it says Maple Syrup, it is. From wikipedia: In the United States, a syrup must be made almost entirely from maple sap to be labelled as “maple”, though states such as Vermont and New York have more restrictive definitions.

                  your guy is calling corn syrup stuff maple syrup when all you gotta do is look at the dang label

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  926 days ago

                  I literally have never had a hard time finding real maple syrup unless I’m in a gas station or something.

                  Maybe it’s because I’m in the Midwest and sugar maple is absolutely everywhere, but it’s very, very easy to find real maple. Yes it’s more expensive, and absolutely yes it tastes far better.

                  Maple syrup to “pancake syrup” is like real butter to hydrogenated palm oil. My mother uses the Blue Bonnet margarine, and I used to use it growing up. As an adult I’ve only used real stick butter and god, going back home sometimes for dinner can really suck. Margarine is so chemical-tasting, how the hell do people butter their toast with it?

                • @Duamerthrax
                  link
                  526 days ago

                  You have to search for the word 'maple". If it just says Syrup, it’s made from corn syrup. This is true everywhere.

          • @elephantium
            link
            English
            1026 days ago

            Hmm. I just went to Target’s website and searched “maple syrup” – even though they have a notoriously bad search, the first row of products were actual maple syrup. The second row had a mix between “pancake syrup” and actual “maple syrup”

            OTOH, searching “pancake syrup” was the opposite – 5 corn syrups before any actual maple syrups.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            526 days ago

            “Maple syrup” is a legally protected name, the same way “butter”, “ice cream”, and “chocolate” are. There are legal requirements for their contents in order for you to call it that on the label. That’s why you see descriptions like “chocolatey” or “buttery” on cheaper products.

                • Fonzie!
                  link
                  fedilink
                  125 days ago

                  I’m asking because laws, especially about food, differ a lot from country to country. It’s not a protected term in my country (NL), and I’m sure it isn’t in most countries outside the anglosphere. Heck, sometimes the same foodstuff can be legally protected with completely different requirements, “pindakaas” (peanutbutter) is allowed to contain a boatload of palm fat but hardly any sugar in the Netherlands, it’s the opposite in the US.

          • credit crazy
            link
            326 days ago

            In my experience unless you’re in Vermont that is quite true but yeah in Vermont just about everyone makes their own maple syrup if I recall correctly we I believe banned corn syrup maple syrup because everyone here takes maple syrup very seriously

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    4026 days ago

    Maple syrup is tree blood. Kind like tree vampirism.

    I don’t think wood smells like food. But I wonder… apparently termites have a bunch of gut bacteria to digest wood. Maybe if you eat raw termites and bark beetles, you can then eat some sawdust. If you continue the process eventually you may be able to eat wood or paper with your own gut biome. Maybe start with a termite, sawdust, and banana smoothie and move up from there. Best of luck.

      • @Akareth
        link
        English
        526 days ago

        The study that your article references is a mouse study, so the relevance to humans is questionable.

        In addition, fiber is shown to be beneficial to humans primarily when comparing the standard American diet to a high-fiber diet. This is likely because fiber is mostly non-digestable by humans (as we’ve lost the ability to digest fiber more than 2-million years ago unlike our closest living great-ape cousins), and acts as a physical barrier to the absorption of sugars and starches which also helps to lower insulin spikes.

        If you do not eat a high-carb diet (such as a ketogenic diet), then eliminating the undigestable matter (i.e. fiber) from your diet is probably beneficial because you’ll be able to absorb more nutrients and get rid of constipation-related issues.

  • acannan
    link
    fedilink
    2726 days ago

    For the majority of human history, we’ve eaten around wood (around a campfire, a hearth, etc), it makes sense it would become intertwined with our food palette

  • @BlackJerseyGiant
    link
    2026 days ago

    We can, and do, eat wood. It’s listed as “cellulose” in the ingredients, and it’s in everything. Your ice cream, your bread, probably up in yo closet doin your Mamma right now

    • @hperrinOP
      link
      526 days ago

      That’s made from plants, including trees, but that’s not really what I’m talking about.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1626 days ago

    Wood is notoriously hard to digest. After wood evolved, it took millions of years before funghi and bacteria evolved the ability to decompose it. And that’s why we have oil now.

  • FartsWithAnAccent
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    OP confirmed for beaver with dental issues.

    It might interest you to know that we do eat wood when we eat that sprinkled parmesan or romano cheese in the plastic containers: It contains wood to prevent the cheese from clumping (and it counts as fiber)

    • Cosmonaut_Collin
      link
      626 days ago

      Thank God I can eat cheese to get my fill of wood for the day.

    • @scutiger
      link
      326 days ago

      If you consider cellulose to be wood, sure. They don’t put actual wood in there.

        • @scutiger
          link
          125 days ago

          Cellulose can come from just about any type of plant. Cotton is almost entirely cellulose, for example.

          I don’t know what their cellulose comes from, but saying cellulose is trees is like saying milk is cheese.

      • @scutiger
        link
        426 days ago

        Many shredded cheeses are mixed with corn and/or potato starches rather than cellulose (which is not wood either)

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    You can. I know a guy who eats a birch log every year. He literally sits on the couch pulling splinters from the log and chews on them while watching tv. He also grinds his egg shells and mixes with oatmeal.

  • xep
    link
    fedilink
    1526 days ago

    I’m… not so sure about this. Also we can eat paper and that’s just mashed up wood, right?

    • @hperrinOP
      link
      2326 days ago

      We can consume it, but we can’t digest it.

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18
        edit-2
        26 days ago

        Also, we should consume it (or other types of dietary fibre)

        https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3614039/

        Dietary fibre is that part of plant material in the diet which is resistant to enzymatic digestion which includes cellulose, noncellulosic polysaccharides such as hemicellulose, pectic substances, gums, mucilages and a non-carbohydrate component lignin. The diets rich in fibre such as cereals, nuts, fruits and vegetables have a positive effect on health since their consumption has been related to decreased incidence of several diseases. Dietary fibre can be used in various functional foods like bakery, drinks, beverages and meat products. Influence of different processing treatments (like extrusion-cooking, canning, grinding, boiling, frying) alters the physico- chemical properties of dietary fibre and improves their functionality. Dietary fibre can be determined by different methods, mainly by: enzymic gravimetric and enzymic—chemical methods. This paper presents the recent developments in the extraction, applications and functions of dietary fibre in different food products.

        Not that we should go around gnawing on wood like beavers, but maybe that’s why some indigestible foods seem like we should be able to eat it

  • @Ballistic_86
    link
    1525 days ago

    I’m guessing it sort of came from the fact that we cook food with burning wood. Less so now, but burning wood meant cooked food for 200k years.

    I don’t think wood smells like it is edible, but a fire can remind me of food through smell.