• mcqtom
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    ·
    5 months ago

    You may find you struggle with step 1.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve been trying to do step one for years. But my bastard relatives refuse to die, and also refuse to be rich. Selfish I call it.

    • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      Zoos tend to struggle with Step 7 and they have far better conditions than a beat up converted freighter

    • Lev_Astov
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Also step 2. $4MM is not enough to run the kind of vessel needed to go to the poles for the length of time needed.

  • TheTechnician27
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Antarctica is generally colder than the Arctic. They would almost certainly be stuck along the coastlines of Antarctica like the penguins are, since the interior average temperatures rival the coldest ones ever recorded in the Arctic. They should be fine there, but then that means they have a very limited distribution and that penguins and seals consequently are always forced to share an environment with the polar bears. Because they’re not used to the polar bears, their populations would likely be destroyed, leaving the polar bears to starve. Unlike in the Arctic, too, they would have nowhere to retreat if their food supply ran out. Outward is hundreds of kilometers of ocean, and inward is hundreds of kilometers of unsurvivable desert.

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      they would have nowhere to retreat if their food supply ran out.

      Um. Hello? There are scientists there.


      Which means scientific papers, then tourists, then garbage and a symbiotic relationship, then the eventual domestication of polar bears.
      Not, you know, the international scientific community treating scientists like cats.

      • Warl0k3
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        “Return Eenie or we feed another physicist to the bears. We know you fuckers took him.”

      • SGforce@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Always wondered what it would have been like had we domesticated these things

        These limbs were adapted for efficient long-distance pacing, rather than the explosive acceleration and high speed pursuits

        Terrifying

  • Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    5 months ago

    Etymologists crying and shaking right now at the thought of Antarctica (meaning: without bears) gaining the one animal it’s not supposed to have

    • SirSamuel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I read that as entomologist for a second and was really confused

      Figured it had something to do with fleas

    • John_CalebBradberton
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      5 months ago

      This comment sent me down a rabbit hole. I had no idea the arctic is called that because it was the Greek for ‘of the bear’ because they used Ursa Major to guide them north. And the the arctic is the most northerly point.

      Fucking wild. Mind blown.

      • cevn
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Wdf how are we just learning this?! Can’t they teach it with the continent names??

      • Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        And it’s a hilarious coincidence that it resulted in the southern most point being Antarctica, as it just happens to be the only continent without bears.

    • Dragonstaff@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not saying this will definitely reverse the Earth’s polarity and doom all life on earth, but do we really want to take that chance?!

      • SkyezOpen
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Looks at earth

        Well, it probably won’t get much worse, and if it does it’ll at least be interesting to see.

  • RegalPotoo
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    66
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’d say that if all you want to do is scare the shit out of some scientists in Antarctica you probably only need 1 polar bear

  • NoFuckingWaynado
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    5 months ago

    I’ve recently learned that bears absolutely love cocaine. I’m sure that’s relevant here somehow.

    • Wooki
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thats why polar bears have white coats

      • felbane
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        I thought they had white coats because they take their methamphetamine production lab very seriously.

        • Wooki
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Pretty sure they are just rolling around in cocaine all day, hence why they are the most feared of the bears. Constantly off their head

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        They’re actually clear coats with hollow fur, which means they always have a way to consume said cocaine. They’ve basically evolved to be addicts.

    • Crashumbc
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I saw that documentary! That is boundary pushing science

    • petersr
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 months ago

      Does it really need to be a big container ship?

      Didn’t people transport stuff in smaller boats back in the day?

      (You still make a valid point though)

      • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Idk, polar bears are really heavy, and it takes a long time to get from one end of the planet to the other, so you want something secure to store the bears in. That means a bigger ship that can handle angry bears hurling themselves at the walls of their cage, because they will wake up during the journey, and they won’t be happy.

  • Ibaudia
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think the penguins would learn to just swim away, and the bears would starve since they would need to expend a lot of effort for a small bird versus the calorie-dense seals they’re used to.

  • SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    This reminds me of a friend that once proposed that if we really wanted to mess with Europe we could release a few packs of coyotes