• ALoafOfBread
      link
      fedilink
      102 hours ago

      The most recent “assassination attempt” was just drummed up by the media. I haven’t seen any evidence it was anything other than a man with some guns in his car who happened to be near the rally.

    • @petersr
      link
      13 hours ago

      3? What others than the one in Butler?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    15
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    yeah it is crazy fact of life that schools get shot up so much more frequently than police stations and federal buildings.

    almost like politicians and police are safer than school children in the system run by police and politicians.

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ
      link
      6
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Also that this “fact of life” almost entirely applies only to schools in the US. The world works in mysterious ways indeed. ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

  • @affiliate
    link
    125 hours ago

    what’s so frustrating is that this “they’re a fact of life” mentality is a self-fulfilling prophecy. and the longer it continues to used as a justification for inaction, the harder it becomes to convince people that gun violence is a solvable problem.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14 hours ago

      yeah, but the solution is taking peoples guns away and many people (as do I) belive that the right to bear arms is an important human right

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 hours ago

          no, there are many countries with some gun rights actually (though they don’t really have school shootings), like austria for example (you don’t need a license for a lot of guns here and those you need the license for it’s easy to get)

      • @affiliate
        link
        74 hours ago

        i mean this as a genuine question: why do you think it’s important that people have access to guns? i never really got the appeal, but also haven’t talked to many people who do think guns are important, so it would be nice to hear a different perspective on this

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -33 hours ago

          for one I just belive that every human should be able to defend themselfs with weapons, if we didn’t have guns I’d belive in the right to bear swoards or a bow

          but now to why I belive this:

          so you should know I’m an anarchist, so I reject every authority, that’s why I think we should have guns, so we can stand up against authority if we need to or even if we lived in an anarchist utopia, we should have them in case a forgein nation would attack

          then you also have to realize, that you can kill someone without a gun, but only if you’re the stronger one. now who is stronger than the avarege woman? the avarege man! so the avarege man could rape and traumatize the avarege woman with no instant consequences so how can the avarege woman defend themself? with a gun

          now I am a transgender individual in a country growing more fascist by the day, should I have to fear assault, rape and murder only because I’m different? no, I should have to be able to defend myself

          I accept that your opinion may be different, and that’s ok, there are good reasons to ban guns, this is just my stance on it

          also, it basically boiles down to one thing: do you preffer freedom or safety? because freedom isn’t safe and safety isn’t free, I personally like freedom more, that’s why I like my guns (and the fact, that gunsmithing is my favourite hobby)

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 hours ago

              yes, I would, as I statet, physically stronger people could easily beat or strangle me to death

                • tmyakal
                  link
                  fedilink
                  3
                  edit-2
                  2 hours ago

                  For real. Any gun I could obtain as a private citizen is not going to stand up to the weight of the police, let alone the US military if a true authoritarian regime took over. My right to a hunting rifle doesn’t matter when they have tanks and drones.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 hours ago

                  that’s not rly how guns work, if I was rly good with guns I could kill someone with a .22lr if they had a 9mm and were bad with guns, the thing is different guns are good for different things, you won’t be able to use a shotgun effectively at 50m++ for example or a sniper rifle at 7m–

                  also how good you are with guns isn’t a genetics thing like physical strength

                  of course I’d rather live in a world without guns, but the moment one person has a gun everyone should have one

  • @mvirts
    link
    6013 hours ago

    It’s time to deploy the-glass-is-necessary-because-its-really-a-hologram conspiracy.

  • @LittleBorat3
    link
    9514 hours ago

    I hate living in this time that makes satire obsolete.

    Can anyone please think of the makers of south park and how they are supposed to make fun of self owning clowns like this?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1911 hours ago

    “That’s why your parents’ tax dollars should be paying for nice, safe, private religious schools!” /s

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1511 hours ago

      No, for tanks. School children need little tanks, like those Barbie thingies but bullet proof and closed. Make schools drive in.

      Or give each child it’s own protective glass shield. Maybe some sort of cubicle.

  • @KazuyaDarklight
    link
    English
    6014 hours ago

    Well yeah, duh, that’s why he has the glass. /S

    • @kitnaht
      link
      3014 hours ago

      This, but without the /s. Completely non-sarcastic.

  • @Soup
    link
    16
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    This actually makes all the sense. If he truly believes it then he’s rightly afraid. If he doesn’t believe then this sends the message to his supporters that they are right to be afraid. Either way it also tries to give him a “martyr in life” kinda vibe by trying to paint him as someone so dangerous to their little deep-state(that totally isn’t 100% conservatives if it’s anything at all) would want to get rid of.

    He also has a very shootable personality and platform, and Trumping have been shot at definitely gives some reason why he’d be behind glass himself.

    Benefit of the doubt interpretation though is a guy who can afford to have security and bullet-proof glass telling little children to “deal with it” is a fucking scumbag-extraordinaire.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    913 hours ago

    Wasn’t the guy who shot at trump staged behind him?

    All that glass is doing is paying the audio engineers for extra work to get the front rows speakered too.

    • @HappycamperNZ
      link
      512 hours ago

      One who hit him was to the front right of him.

      But was thinking why you don’t just pick a spot behind him.

      • @EtherWhack
        link
        111 hours ago

        Honestly, they should just put a box or dome over him as it would just need someone crazy enough but smart enough to calculate an arc.

        Better yet, just hold the rallies in a properly inspected building. (Not sure if any property owners will let them rent anymore though.)

  • @Valmond
    link
    713 hours ago

    I wonder how they deal with drones.

    • OptionalOP
      link
      1913 hours ago

      There’s only one way to find out!

      Hypothetically.

      • @HappycamperNZ
        link
        712 hours ago

        Can’t wait until we use a predator drone to dome a predator.

    • @A_A
      link
      6
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      Fake polls paid by GOP would explain that if I read correctly that big post with lots of comments here (on lemmy) 1 or 2 days ago.

      • @TexasDrunk
        link
        512 hours ago

        This is an opinion only. I wanted to preface it that way because I realized how much it sounded like I had inside knowledge. I do not. I’m a drunk, ignorant redneck.

        I wouldn’t put it past them, but those polls shouldn’t move the needle very far at places like the silver bulletin or 538 because they weigh based on how trustworthy the polls are. Reputable polls aren’t getting bought and fake polls may hit news articles but don’t really hit forecasts very hard.

        I’ve watched 538 since they came back online. There was a point where Kamala had greater than a 60 in 100 chance to win. Right now it’s about as low as it has been with her up 53 to 46.

        We’re halfway through October so I have no idea if we’re getting a surprise. I’d like to see something that tilts things blue.

      • @MrVilliam
        link
        English
        1110 hours ago

        I fucking hate this. Are people really that oblivious regarding who these people have shown themselves to be?

        On one side, the top of the ticket is somebody who has lied and cheated their whole life, even to a criminal extent, and has never shown any capacity to learn or grow in any meaningful way. They have shown nothing but contempt for anything related to justice or democracy or social progress. The VP pick for this candidate is funded by tech bro billionaires whose entire philosophy is predicated on the notion that a few wealthy and powerful oligarchs should dominate a rule over their lesser peasant-like laborers.

        On the other side, the top of the ticket is a career civil servant who has been elected to all three branches of government and holds a juris doctore that proves their competency in law and the processes therein. They have flaws, but appear to be open to learning and growing, changing stances on policies as the times change and more information comes out. The VP pick for this candidate is perhaps best known for expanding liberties and ensuring that all schoolchildren were properly fed in the state that they were elected Governor of.

        This election should be a fucking blowout victory for the latter candidate. It’s absolutely absurd that it could be even remotely close. There is, and I’m not exaggerating when I say this, nothing redeeming about the other ticket. Nothing. They will not help you in any way. They will consolidate wealth and power for themselves and their inner circle, and you ain’t in it. They are not only unwilling, but unable to show any sincere compassion for you. The best they can offer is sociopathic performance of compassion to manipulate you into giving them your vote. Do not fall for these proven charlatans.

    • OptionalOP
      link
      213 hours ago

      You may reliably expect it to be reported as such, whatever the facts.

  • @EtherWhack
    link
    212 hours ago

    Seeing the top and back completely open, I see it as just for show/security theater.