“The body mass index has long been criticized as a flawed indicator of health. A replacement has been gaining support: the body roundness index.” Article unfortunately doesn’t give the freaking formula for chrissakes; it’s “364.2 − 365.5 × √(1 − [waist circumference in centimeters / 2π]2 / [0.5 × height in centimeters]2), according to the formula developed by Thomas et al.10”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    345 hours ago

    This is the ideal male body. You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.

    • @jaybone
      link
      72 hours ago

      Don’t skip scarf day

    • IndiBrony
      link
      English
      44 hours ago

      As an overweight 35 year old who wore skinny jeans: I feel this.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    638 hours ago

    BMI is the best measure we have for statistical purposes (i.e., a population) because it’s been around for 50(?) years and is what is often used in studies, so you can compare one study to another using BMI.

    It’s also not terrible for a population because it averages out. But for an individual it is definitely not a good measure because there are way too many other variables that matter.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      100% this, plus it’s very easy to measure.

      For individuals the tg/HDL ratio is promising as a great marker for insulin resistance (lower is better). But it requires a blood test, for academic purposes it’s also good because most checkup blood tests have these two markers recorded.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        Yes! Thanks, I had started to mention that and ended up with a huge run on sentence and it didn’t make it through the editing process. 😅.

        • AatubeOP
          link
          fedilink
          131 minutes ago

          we publishing peer-reviewed comments with this one

    • @Mojave
      link
      115 minutes ago

      This is giving me body fat percentages that are around double what I get from other methods. Not sure what’s up, but I don’t really believe my 5’8" 150lb ass is 30% body fat

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Height selection on metric side has jumps of up to 3 centimeters lmao. Makes me doubtful about the accuracy since I’ve never before seen that

      I’m also pretty skinny and it says my BMI and body fat is great but that I’m too round. I don’t even have belly and it is showing me as quite rotund lol. I think there’s something fucky going on with my measurements or about inputting metric into the calculator.

      E: Tried it again and now I’m out of healthy zone for being too lean. Hmm. I’m not sure if I measured wrong or they’re saying I should have a bit of a belly. Which is the sort of medical advice I actually want lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        228 minutes ago

        Height selection on metric side has jumps of up to 3 centimeters lmao.

        Too lazy to look, but given 1 inch = 2.54 cm, my guess is the tool is written in inches, and just rounds those values to the nearest whole cm, thus alternating between 2 & 3 cm increments.

    • Tarquinn2049
      link
      2
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      Hmm, that puts me at BRI of 2.1, and BMI of 35.4

      Those both seem incredibly off.

      But I do have extra dense bones apparently, which tends to be mostly what screws with my BMI, and my ability to float/swim. But they seem really hard to break, not that I try very hard… but none of them have broken yet. And I’ve been in situations that seem like they should have broken.

      Either way, I weigh alot more than I look like I should, not quite “Wolverine getting on a motorbike”, but a bit like that.

      Kinda makes me wish those “guess your weight” carnival experts were something I could see in real life, only ever seen it on TV.

  • @I_Fart_Glitter
    link
    339 hours ago

    Can’t tell you how disappointed I am that isn’t just a chart of increasingly tubby kittens.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    16
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Interesting. Found a calculator and according to this I’m “very lean” (only just) while I’m overweight (again, only just) using BMI.

    Judging by the belly fat I can pinch, I’m gonna trust the BMI

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      24 hours ago

      Yeah not sure how I feel about BRI. It’s telling me my BRI is fine, but I’m rounder than I’d like to be.

      • @Chee_Koala
        link
        22 hours ago

        How round one wants to be is easily influenced by external factors like culture, though. I think slim bodies look sleek and beautiful, but it’s probably healthier to have a bit of fat in the right places (for times when your digestive system is on the fritz)

        I like the effort for a body weight stat being more complete or useful for individuals, but my efforts measuring BRI came up kind of wack too :(. We decided it judged me too thin.

    • vovo
      link
      fedilink
      9
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Wikipedia has a chart:

      I would be healthier if I were 1.4m.

      • @Nikls94
        link
        27 hours ago

        I can I get your height? Gotta be 2.2m

        • vovo
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          For all waists < 85cm, 1.4m would be the best height.

    • @davidgro
      link
      14 hours ago

      Link please? Looks more informative than the one in another comment