- cross-posted to:
- politics
- cross-posted to:
- politics
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22744169
Florida State Senator Ileana Garcia has introduced legislation to prohibit “weather modification” activities in the state.
Does this affect Jewish space lasers at all? Asking for a friend
So, a plane that dumps water onto a fire is dispersing a chemical (water) with the express purpose of controlling the temperature. So firefighting planes would be illegal under this bill.
Sure is a good thing that florida doesn’t have forest fires… RIGHT?
I mean, that’s fine. No one is doing that anyway, so it won’t affect anything. It’s like banning post-birth abortion.
Prohibit “weather modification”.
So are they banning Sharpies?
Worse: Weather modification, though possible, just doesn’t really work. People gave up on that back in the day.
The bill was filed on November 20 by Garcia, a Republican
Was anyone really unsure of her party affiliation by this point in the article?
The “Weather Modification Activities” bill sets out that “the injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of a chemical, a chemical compound, a substance, or an apparatus into the atmosphere within the borders of this state for the express purpose of affecting the temperature, the weather, or the intensity of sunlight is prohibited.”
So, taking it at the closely-adjacent letter like how Repub trash interprets everything, all industry in the entire state must cease, including power generation.
Nope, it says “express purpose” meaning that my doomsday machine is legal because it’s purpose is to… Uhh… Make snow cones! The earthquakes and volcanoes are just a side effect.
The same people who think humans can’t alter the climate also claim that the government is controlling the weather.
Does this prohibit people from shooting at the clouds to scare them away?
People can’t afford home insurance, seniors are being driven from their condos but let’s focus on a law addressing conspiracy theories. Next up, a law protecting big foot.
I feel sorry for all the entrepreneurs and employees in the chemtrail industry.
Imagine that you’re flying a chemtrailer and then a wild $10000 fee appears out of nowhere, and there’s a shark. Are you going to choose the shark? Nobody would. I guess a fine of $1000 is just the cost of doing chemtrail business now.
“I’m trying to make gay frogs.”
It worked!
(Technically there are chemtrails that exist. Crop dusting planes. So i actually wonder if this will impact crop dusting in any capacity.)
I don’t know what chems you’ve been huffing, but they seem fun, so please share some 😄
Puff Puff Pass!
I’m after you
“Pass the dutchie on the left hand side” isn’t just a Tim Hortons slogan
Imagine every commercial jet that leaves a contrail now having to go to court.
“911, what is your emergency?”
“THERE IS A PLANE IN THE SKY SPREADING CHEMICALS OVER MY HOUSE”
This has more implications than I think most realize. This would also prevent climate engineering or hurricane avoidance efforts. I wouldn’t want just anybody to try these kinds of things without a lot of effort to understand the consequences and public debate, but this seems pretty short sighted.
I thought we were using nuclear weapons for that.
The airlines should immediately halt service to the entire state if this goes in to effect. Why waste the time and money defending yourself against these conspiracies.
the injection, release, or dispersion, by any means, of a chemical, a chemical compound, a substance, or an apparatus into the atmosphere within the borders of this state for the express purpose of affecting the temperature, the weather, or the intensity of sunlight is prohibited.
it doesn’t affect them.
It’s stupid as fuck but is slightly saved by being worded as to be utterly and completely toothless.
And again I’m grateful that I’m not from the US. I know dumb people are everywhere but you clearly have loudest.
Hope it passes so everyone flying a jet plane over Florida that leaves a contrail or agricultural spraying has to go to court to get the fine dismissed.
No more planes into or out of Florida doesn’t sound like the worst outcome to me.
These bills are always branded as being “anti-chemtrail,” because it gets more clicks but they are banning a real thing that actually exists. The idea of chemically altering the atmosphere to address global warming is something that scientists have seriously considered and experimented with, but the general consensus is that while the concept is possible, the risks outweigh the benefits. On the other hand, there are certain irresponsible groups of techbros like Make Sunsets which have taken it into their own hands and have been releasing a bunch of sulfur into the stratosphere, to widespread criticism from actual scientists, while they try to present themselves as an environmentalist charity.
So there is a real thing that they’re targeting, but also, it’s not going to do anything since the restrictions only apply within a given jurisdiction. At most, it might prevent certain universities and such from conducting tests (which isn’t an inherently bad thing given the dangers).
What it comes down to is basically the same formula as the whole “eating bugs” and “15 minute cities” things. Somebody gets paid to come up with a solution to climate change that doesn’t involve interfering with capitalism in any way, they come up with some out of the box idea that might help a little - then reactionaries latch onto that, because as they all “know,” climate change isn’t real, so whatever weird idea anyone comes up with must be the real reason why the global elites are spreading the myth.
Of course, conservatives probably aren’t concerned about this concept for the same reasons scientists are, and I’m sure there’s conspiracy theories out there that do go the whole chemtrail route with it, but hey. They kinda sorta accidentally have a little bit of a point on this one.