Summary

House Speaker Mike Johnson plans to cut 75% of federal agencies, reducing them from 428 to 99, in collaboration with Elon Musk’s “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE), led by Vivek Ramaswamy.

Johnson’s agenda includes defunding PBS, Planned Parenthood, and curbing the “administrative state” through legislation and executive orders under Donald Trump.

Critics warn such cuts would impact jobs, healthcare, and essential services.

Backed by recent Supreme Court rulings limiting agency authority, Johnson and DOGE aim to reduce federal regulations, sparking significant debate over these drastic proposals.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1076 days ago

    It just blows my mind how evil these people are. They put all this destructive effort into everything they can think of 24/7, with little to no creation of anything with benefits.

    They’re little evil toddlers just smashing everything they can get thier mitts on.

  • ThePowerOfGeek
    link
    English
    94
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    You know how people look back at history and go “the situation back then wasn’t perfect, but the idiotic way some in power tried to fix it just made it soooo much worse!”…

    Yeah, this is the next step up in the current cycle of this. In centuries to come anyone who is about able to reflect on things will not look at Johnson et al at all favorably.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      486 days ago

      in the centuries to come, the beings that replace humans won’t know who the fuck mike johnson was.

      • ThePowerOfGeek
        link
        English
        66 days ago

        My original comment was supposed to say ‘able’ not ‘about’. Because I had the same thought as you.

  • @GoofSchmoofer
    link
    356 days ago

    If this happens there would be a blue wave that took over and would spend the next 4+ years trying to reduce the bleeding which is long enough for many non politically engaged people to forget it was the republicans that started it, who would then blame the Democrats for screwing up the economy .

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    125 days ago

    Seeing as how there’s a growing dissent toward politicians and health-care CEOs, maybe bringing up axes isn’t the smartest thing right now?

    Of course I’m joking, but 75%? Why not an equally plausible number like 120% of federal agencies?

    • Bakkoda
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15 days ago

      This is typical melee weapon escalation. First they came for my axe. Then they came for my zweihänder. Finally they came for my quarter staff.

  • @NatakuNox
    link
    506 days ago

    Isn’t that like several hundred thousands of employees? Suddenly unemployment will be sky high and you think health care CEOs are going to be looking over their shoulders now? Just wait. Mike will need his own presidential security detail to just look outside.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      186 days ago

      You won’t have any agency recording unemployment levels, so there will be no details about it. All you need to know citizen is that the Trump leadership is flourishing as it enters its 6th term, and all your problems that you experience are because of minorities.

    • @Frozengyro
      link
      56 days ago

      There are roughly 2 million US government employees. So 1.5 million people unemployed? Which wouldn’t send unemployment sky high, but pretty high.

      • @hedgehogging_the_bed
        link
        English
        186 days ago

        1.5 million in direct unemployment, but consider the knock on unemployment for all the services those workers won’t need. Coffee shops, dry cleaners, parking lots, Uber/Lift drivers, childcare, etc. Employed people pay for services while employed that are directly tied to that employment and those businesses will also layoff their workers when these jobs disappear

      • @MehBlah
        link
        English
        136 days ago

        1.5 million people who know how the system works hell bent on fucking over one shitty human.

      • @Madison420
        link
        25 days ago

        You gotta add the state agencies who are supported by federal agencies. So like 50 -100k for every red state.

      • @bitchkat
        link
        English
        26 days ago

        Does that 2 million include contractors?

        • @Frozengyro
          link
          76 days ago

          No, though I imagine they would rather hire a ton of contractors and end up paying them more

          • @bitchkat
            link
            English
            26 days ago

            I think it’s privitazion that will be their preferred option. The government workers will be offered jobs in the private sector at less pay while the privatized company will charge more.

            They’ll probably even have another company that will manage leasing office space. The We Work guy is probably waiting for his comeback.

            • @CheeseNoodle
              link
              English
              25 days ago

              Could always do the UK model (Currently being used on the NHS) The workers keep their jobs and the state/public still pay for everything but the workers are now magically actually employed by a private company that extracts profit by charging the government for stuff it was already doing without providing anything whatsoever.

              • @bitchkat
                link
                English
                35 days ago

                That is basically what I was saying. It’s just a means to transfer money from the federal government to private corps.

            • @NatakuNox
              link
              36 days ago

              The private sector is not equipped to absorb millions of people. Most of these government workers are highly educated and highly specialized. These people aren’t going to just replace the millions of jobs Trump is planning to deport from the labor force.

              • @bitchkat
                link
                English
                26 days ago

                You know that, I know that and I’m sure the people calling for these cuts know it. The difference is they don’t care.

  • @Mediocre_Bard
    link
    406 days ago

    Sounds like a CEO move. Anyone on his street?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    65 days ago

    Mike Johnson and the boys about to break things they don’t understand to look cool for mouth breathers, making the rest of us suffer for decades.

  • Nine
    link
    75 days ago

    It’s a libertarian wet dream…. That will fuck over regular people for decades…

  • @PoopSpiderman
    link
    346 days ago

    The wrong people will die due to how callous, and/or stupid the trump administration will be.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        146 days ago

        I don’t know, man. There are a LOT of guns floating around out there to be making people desperate.

        Just ask the United Healthcare CEO about making decisions that affect people’s lives negatively.

        Oh wait…

  • @LovingHippieCat
    link
    306 days ago

    Ah yes the old “government so small they can drown it in a bathtub” plan. They want all this cut. But also want to police abortion and trans people. Small but only in the areas they want.

    • @GraniteM
      link
      15 days ago

      There are people who, disturbed by “big government” today and its tendency to curb the advantages they might gain if their competitiveness were allowed free flow, demand “less govern- ment.” Alas, there is no such thing as less government, merely changes in government. If the libertarians had their way, the distant bureaucracy would vanish and the local bully would be in charge. Personally, I prefer the distant bureaucracy, which may not find me, over the local bully, who certainly will. And all historical precedent shows a change to localism to be for the worse.

      —Isaac Asimov, Nice Guys Finish First, collected in The Sun Shines Bright, 1981

  • acargitz
    link
    fedilink
    15
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    As an outsider looking in, I am wondering whether this might mean that the Republican party has a vision for a weaker federal government, such that the states would have more, well, rights. I.e., if the federal government gets very scaled down, is that at the same time emptying up the regulatory space for individual states to go in all sorts of different directions, or does it come with some kind of libertarian straightjacket?

    The majority of the US population lives in wealthy blue states. If the regressive rural states can’t stomach the kind of extensive welfare state that makes sense in more urbanized places, fine. Like a “two speed Europe”, they can choose to stay behind, so long as California, Massachusetts, NY etc get the freedom to experiment with social democratic policies.

    Edit: this kind of more decoupled federalism also exists eg in Canada. Quebec gets to pretend it’s France while Alberta gets to pretend it’s Texas.

    • @NotBillMurray
      link
      236 days ago

      In effect they want states to be able to do what they want, as long as it aligns with Republican ideals. All you need to do is look at their rhetoric towards sanctuary cities for the “states rights” argument to fall apart.

      Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

      -Frank Wilhoit

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        116 days ago

        Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: there must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

        -Frank Wilhoit “The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” ― John Kenneth Galbraith

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      55 days ago

      Our dumbfucks fucks here in Quebec are increasingly leaning towards the Americanization of Canada.

      I’ve seen so many people talking about how it would be cool to be the 51st state when he met Trudeau.

      • @RubberElectrons
        link
        65 days ago

        As an American, I urge you to fight that effort, in a serious way. America rocks, but also sucks in several major fuckin’ ways.

        Good luck, stay Canadian and keep up the mutual love.

    • @Maggoty
      link
      2
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      Oh no. It’s entirely so they can do stupid shit. They’ll happily ax 75% of agencies and set the DOJ to making sure Blue States don’t just do it on their own. We’ve seen this play out in some red states already where they forfeit any regulation on a subject and then ban the blue cities from doing it themselves.

    • @Dkarma
      link
      26 days ago

      Wait until the override the posse comatatus act. The. It will be clear. They plan to make money slaves out of blue states.

  • @scripthook
    link
    126 days ago

    Easier said than done. Dems can use the fillibuster and a lot of gutting of federal agencies require going through a budget committee as well. Things move slow in congress and they have 2 years to slash everything…

      • Nine
        link
        15 days ago

        I think that’s the party that is paid to loose…