• @AA5B
    link
    English
    635 minutes ago

    This is news? The article’s own graph puts this about 6 years ago

  • GHiLA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    350 minutes ago

    My family has a signal group. I started it two years ago.

    Almost no one pays any attention to it, unless they accidentally open the app once a month, but they’re all still there and can be spoken to.

    I put a PSA out a month ago that I’ll no longer respond on Facebook Messenger or SMS after the turn of the year. Tough shit. There was some groaning but, if there’s no other way, either use Signal or invest in a Pigeon coop and get training.

    • @prof_wafflez
      link
      English
      2
      edit-2
      19 minutes ago

      There was some groaning but, if there’s no other way, either use Signal or invest in a Pigeon coop and get training.

      Any particular reason you are abandoning SMS? Any particular reason for the strict rule?

      • GHiLA
        link
        fedilink
        English
        216 minutes ago

        RCS ain’t universal. I only have it with some iPhone users and the rare Pixel.

        If it’s what’s for dinner, I don’t care. Musk can know I had some hamburger steak.

        If it’s the code to your tablet, mom, ask on Signal.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      English
      248 hours ago

      People go where their friends are. Their grandparents are on Facebook.

      • Vanth
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2617 hours ago

        Has FB been cool since they got rid of signups limited by .edu email addresses?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2917 hours ago

          That was basically the end. When it was only friends and the feed sorted by “new,”, it was super fun. When my aunts started joining it became much less fun.

          • @SlopppyEngineer
            link
            English
            913 hours ago

            the feed sorted by “new,”

            Yeah, and it went from “let’s just add some stuff” to outright “we will force feed you this slop and you will like it” from there. It felt like you were a goose being prepped for Christmas’ foie gras.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1217 hours ago

          That’s when it was cool to teens who didn’t have .edu emails addresses (but not long after).

      • @kautau
        link
        English
        1013 hours ago

        “In the beginning:”

        Facebook was a MySpace alternative for “academics” (college students / alums) instead of teens.

        LinkedIn was a MySpace alternative for “professionals” instead of teens.

        Forums were an evolution of BBSs that predated “social” media because it wasn’t you, it was an avatar, a fake persona you created rather than “first name,” “last name.”

        ICQ and Skype were purely chat platforms, competing in a completely different space.

        I have no idea what point this rant is trying to make but all the comparisons between services are way off base.

        • @rottingleaf
          link
          English
          -4
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          but all the comparisons between services are way off base.

          My experience in Russia. No, they are not off base. Just naturally there are different PoVs and for you it may be something entirely else. You can think about that before saying something is wrong.

          MySpace

          Say, I’m not sure many people even knew of that where I am.

          Forums were an evolution of BBSs that predated “social” media because it wasn’t you, it was an avatar, a fake persona you created rather than “first name,” “last name.”

          People using real names in the Web were the weird ones, but it was normal to meet IRL those you know via forums.

          I have no idea what point this rant is trying to make

          Your failure, not mine.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    3915 hours ago

    It’s pretty clear. Facebook is now full of crap created by artificial intelligence (and not only).

  • Maeve
    link
    fedilink
    7717 hours ago

    Because Whatsapp is totally not owned by FB.

    • @lemmylommy
      link
      English
      5617 hours ago

      It’s not about why owns it. It’s about where young people can be without getting bothered by their parents and other old people.

      • @Lost_My_Mind
        link
        English
        1917 hours ago

        I’m 41…you telling me the kids today don’t think of me as the greatest person who ever existed??? Pssshhh that’s malarkey! I won’t hear of it! EVERYONE thinks I’m the greatest person who ever existed! My lexicon includes words like “malarkey” and “lexicon”! Kids think that’s cool right???

        • @AA5B
          link
          English
          132 minutes ago

          Clearly you young people are fine being on Lemmy with old people

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2014 hours ago

          I’m 39 so I am slightly more rizz than you. I maintain my levels of brat by regularly updating my skibidi vocab.

      • @rottingleaf
        link
        English
        115 hours ago

        That’s about phone number requirement for signup. Not about platforms.

        OK. Life is life.

        I’ve just had a traumatic memory of one young person, a girl (with possibly undiagnosed ASPD), from 13 years ago.

        Feel nausea and want to throw up every time thinking about that kind of places, dynamics, emotions.

  • Dem Bosain
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7518 hours ago

    Where there any teens on Twitter? Last I was there it was full of angry middle-age men.

    • psychOdelic
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1415 hours ago

      before musk came it was pretty full, most of them have moved to threads

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      313 hours ago

      Ah, the curse of algorithmic social network. It’s full of angry middle-aged men if you follow those / interact with them. There are / were big communities formed around various pop stars on Twitter and those are quite different demographics.

  • Vanth
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4217 hours ago

    That is a weird way of describing it. Teens aren’t “abandoning” FB & X; they never signed up to begin with. And why would that? They are platforms built for and filled with millennials+.

  • cheer
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2618 hours ago

    A decade ago is when teens stopped using Facebook, unless they’re counting Instagram in those metrics?

    • @AA5B
      link
      English
      129 minutes ago

      Look at the graph in the article: it’s the only newsworthy piece. Assuming the numbers are legit, the lines crossed about 6 years ago.

      Of course the x axis not having any labeled points there doesn’t fill me with confidence. Perhaps it’s just two points for each and they drew a straight line

  • Obinice
    link
    English
    1115 hours ago

    WhatsApp? The instant messenger boomers use on their phones?

    Damn, who saw that coming.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        410 hours ago

        Weird that this is your association as using it would require an iPhone which most youth don’t have. My thought was Telegram, which is omnipresent at least around me, with Whatsapp often being kept just for the parents or older relatives.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              113 minutes ago

              No, it’s used by just about everyone. Generally the younger the person and the bigger their city, the more likely they are to travitate towards Telegram rather than Whatsapp.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            48 hours ago

            I know, and it’s terrible that it’s so unavoidable. I managed to avoid Whatsapp, but without Telegram managing university life would be incredibly hard.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2414 hours ago

      Most countries stopped using SMS ages ago. WhatsApp, Signal and Telegram are ubiquitous.

  • kratoz29
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2017 hours ago

    Okay? But what does Whatsapp has anything to do with the other? DM?

    I don’t consider WhatsApp social media.

    • @egrets
      link
      English
      412 hours ago

      WhatsApp has channels (public feeds centered around topics, a bit like microblogging), communities (groups about a subject, much like Facebook Groups), and updates (temporal video/photo statuses to share with your friends). You might only use it for DM, but it has much bigger aspirations.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1918 hours ago

    Ok, I feel old. The only reason facebook has any relevance to me is the market place. What’s the best alternative?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1918 hours ago

      That’s just it, Facebook is kinda the default option, and almost everyone has an account there. It’s why so many clubs arrange everything through a Facebook page.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    615 hours ago

    well Facebook still owns them and will own them when they all switch to instagram reels like America wants them to do

  • Dragon Rider (drag)
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -315 hours ago

    Isn’t whatsapp for old people? Drag uses Discord instead. It’s not great, but at least it doesn’t hack your phone.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      258 minutes ago

      As much as I dislike Whatsapp and love Discord. Private messages in Whatsapp are encrypted while Discord messages are entirely collected